Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of three methods to assess the degree of milk-out in dairy cows

  • D. Meyer (a1), A. Haeussermann (a1), K. Barth (a2), S. Lingner (a1) and E. Hartung (a1)...

Abstract

The assessment of the completeness of milk-out in dairy cows is one of the indicators used to evaluate and optimise the milking process. A number of different methods and thresholds are available for this purpose, but procedures and validation of the methods are not always described in detail, and may vary between studies. The objective of this study was to introduce and evaluate a new, precisely defined hand-milking method (DEFINED) and to compare its outcome with two commonly applied methods to assess the completeness of milking: visual scoring of the degree of quarter filling (VISUAL) and quantitative assessment of the number of easy strips (EASYSTRIPS). Each of the three methods was applied in 131 Holstein cows of six dairy herds in northern Germany. The assessment of milk-out was carried out by three experienced but non-regular milkers (evaluators). Each evaluator visited the six herds once during afternoon milking. To avoid any transitions, the interval between visits of two evaluators was at least 2 days. Maximum hand-milking time per cow was set to 60 s. The total strip yield collected in 60 s (SY60) by the application of a strip frequency of 1 Hz was used as a reference for the amount of milk left in the investigated quarter after machine-milking. The three methods were evaluated by analysing their statistical relationship with SY60, and by ranking their suitability for quantitative or qualitative assessment of milk-out. VISUAL and SY60 were not related, indicating that VISUAL was unsuitable for estimating the amount of milk left actually in the udder quarters. The strip yield in 15 s (DEFINED) and SY60 was significantly related, but results varied among evaluators. With regard to EASYSTRIPS, a significant relationship with SY60 was found, but the results were influenced by evaluator and herd. The findings of this study imply that DEFINED allows a rapid and farm-independent quantitative estimate of the post-milking strip yield. Likewise, EASYSTRIPS was meaningful in assessing milk-out of quarters in a given herd, whereas VISUAL allowed neither a quantitative nor a qualitative assessment of post-milking strip yield or milk-out. Thresholds for complete or incomplete milk-out by DEFINED must be lower than those commonly applied in 15 s of post-milking.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Besier, J and Bruckmaier, RM 2016. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 30963102.
Bothur, D and Wehowsky, G 1978. Untersuchungen über Ursache und Wirkung des Hochgleitens der Melkbecher an den Zitzen in der Endphase des Melkprozesses [Investigations on cause and effects of teat cups sliding up the teat during the last phase of the milking process]. Monatsheft für Veterinärmedizin 33, 20172022.
Bruckmaier, RM and Hilger, M 2001. Milk ejection in dairy cows at different degrees of udder filling. Journal of Dairy Research 68, 369376.
Bruckmaier, RM, Schams, D and Blum, JW 1993. Milk removal in familiar and unfamiliar surroundings: concentrations of oxytocin, prolactin, cortisol and beta-endorphin. Journal of Dairy Research 60, 449456.
Clarke, T, Cuthbertson, EM, Greenall, RK, Hannah, MC, Jongman, E and Shoesmith, D 2004. Milking regimes to shorten milking duration. Journal of Dairy Research 71, 419426.
Davis, MA and Reinemann, DJ 2001. Methodology of measuring strip yield. In Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality, 13–15 January 2001, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 387391.
Davis, MA, Reinemann, DJ and Mein, GA 2000. Relationships between physical characteristics and milking characteristics of the aging milking liner. Paper presented at the Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 2000, 9–12 July 2000, Milwaukee, WI, USA, Paper number 00-3014.
Dragulescu, AA and Arendt, C 2018. xlsx: read, write, format Excel 2007 and Excel97/2000/XP/2003 files. R package version 0.6.1. Retrieved on 12 December 2018 from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=xlsx.
Edwards, JP, Jago, JG and Lopez-Villalobos, N 2013. Short-term application of prestimulation and increased automatic cluster remover threshold affect milking characteristics of grazing dairy cows in late lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 18861893.
Jago, JG, Burke, JL and Williamson, JH 2010. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 25412549.
Joe, AK, Cranefield, SW, Hodge, IC and Clarke, TG 2010. Summary of problems identified in 200 milking assessments from mastitis problem herds during 2008 and 2009 in two regions of New Zealand. In Proceedings of 5th International Dairy Federation Mastitis Conference, 21–24 March 2010, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 363369.
Jones, GM 1999. The role of milking equipment in mastitis. Retrieved on 30 December 2018 from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/80765/VCE404_742.pdf?sequence=1.
Krömker, V 2006. Kurzes Lehrbuch der Milchkunde und Milchhygiene Brief textbook of dairy research and milk hygiene, Volume 1. Enke, Erlangen, Germany.
Magliaro, AL and Kensinger, RS 2005. Automatic cluster remover setting affects milk yield and machine-on time in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 148153.
Mein, G, Dyson, R, Eden, M, Reinemann, D, Burke, J, Jago, J, Greenall, R and Penry, J 2010. How completely should we aim to empty cows’ udders at milking time? Summary and Recommendations 2010. Retrieved on 12 July 2018 from http://docplayer.net/37446502-Summary-and-recommendations-june-9-2010.html
Mein, GA and Reid, DA 1996. Milking-time test and guidelines for milking units. In Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, 18–21 February 1996, Nashville, TN, USA, pp. 235243.
Mein, GA, Thiel, CC and Akam, DN 1973. Mechanics of the teat and teatcup liner during milking: information from radiographs. Journal of Dairy Research 40, 179189.
Neijenhuis, F, Mein, GA, Britt, JS, Reinemann, DJ, Hillterton, JE, Farnsworth, R, Baines, JR, Hemling, T, Ohnstad, I, Cook, N and Morgan, WF 2001. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 4. Relationship between teat-end callosity or hyperkeratosis and mastitis. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality of the National Mastitis Council, 13–15 September 2001, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 362366.
Penry, JF, Endres, EL, de Bruijn, B, Kleinhans, A, Crump, PM, Reinemann, DJ and Hernandez, LL 2017. Effect of incomplete milking on milk production rate and composition with 2 daily milkings. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 15351540.
Pinheiro, J, Bates, D, DebRoy, S, Sarkar, D and R Core Team 2018. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. Retrieved on 12 July 2018 from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
Rasmussen, MD 1993. Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health. Journal of Dairy Research 60, 287297.
R Core Team 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved on 12 July 2018 from http://www.R-project.org/.
Reid, DA and Stewart, SC 1997. The effects on parlor performance by variations of detacher settings. In Proceeding of the 36th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, 16–19 February 1997, Albuquerque, NM, USA, pp. 101103.
Reinemann, DJ, Mein, GA and Ruegg, PL 2001. Evaluating milking machine performance. Retrieved on 5 December 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255525487_Evaluating_Milking_Machine_Performance.
Stelwagen, K 2001. Effect of milking frequency on mammary functioning and shape of lactation curve. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 204211.
Stelwagen, K, Knight, CH, Farr, VC, Davis, SR, Prosser, CG and McFadden, TB 1996. Continuous versus single drainage of milk from the bovine gland during a 24-hour period. Experimental Physiology 81, 141149.
Stelwagen, K, Van Espen, DC, Verkerk, GA, McFadden, H and Farr, VC 1998. Elevated plasma cortisol reduces permeability of mammary tight junctions in the lactating bovine mammary epithelium. Journal of Endocrinology 159, 173178.
Weaver, SR and Hernandez, LL 2016. Autocrine-paracrine regulation of the mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 842853.
Wehowsky, G 1972 Modellvorstellungen über die Entstehung und Gewinnungs-möglichkeiten von Nachmilch Model conceptions about the formation of rest milk and possibilities for extraction. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe 21, 309312.
Wickham, H 2009. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
Wickham, H 2011. plyr: the split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. Retrieved on 12 July 2018 from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v40/i01/.
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, NJ, Saveliev, AA and Smith, GM 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, 1st edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Meyer et al. supplementary material
Meyer et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (43 KB)
43 KB

Evaluation of three methods to assess the degree of milk-out in dairy cows

  • D. Meyer (a1), A. Haeussermann (a1), K. Barth (a2), S. Lingner (a1) and E. Hartung (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed