Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:08:53.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbage intake and growth of rabbits under different pasture type, herbage allowance and quality conditions in organic production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

H. Legendre
Affiliation:
GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
J.-P. Goby
Affiliation:
Université de Perpignan, IUT, F-66962 Perpignan, France
A. Duprat
Affiliation:
GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
T. Gidenne
Affiliation:
GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, ENVT, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
G. Martin*
Affiliation:
AGIR, Université de Toulouse, INRA, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
Get access

Abstract

A lack of knowledge about rabbit herbage intake during grazing limits the development of organic rabbit production. This study describes rabbit herbage intake under a wide range of grazing conditions and characterises the factors that decrease rabbit herbage intake and daily weight gain. It was conducted with growing rabbits reared in moving cages with 0.4 m2 of grazing area per rabbit. Rabbits grazed on pastures dominated by legumes (LEG) or grass and forbs (GRF) and received 60 g/day per rabbit of a complete pelleted feed. Three trials were performed in winter, summer and spring. Mean herbage allowance was 27% higher in LEG (62.3 g dry matter (DM)/kg metabolic weight (MW), equal to kg0.75) than in GRF (49.2 g DM/kg MW). Herbage intake varied greatly (36.3±18.0 g DM/kg MW) among trials and was higher in LEG than in GRF (39.5v.34.1 g DM/kg MW). For both pasture types, herbage intake was logarithmically related to herbage allowance and plateaued around 75 g DM/kg MW. Crude protein and digestible energy (DE) intake differed by pasture type and season. Mean CP intake was 40% higher in LEG (15.0 g/kg MW) than in GRF (10.7 g/kg MW). In summer, mean DE intake was 27% higher in LEG than in GRF but no significant differences in DE intake were found between LEG and GRF in winter and spring. Maximum DE intake plateaued near 1000 kJ/kg MW. Daily weight gain was always higher for rabbits grazing LEG (mean=22.6 g) than GRF (mean=16.0 g). Weight gain was significantly related to CP intake, whereas DE intake had no significant effect. Meeting the objective of mean daily weight gain of 20 g requires herbage intake of 32 and 50 g DM/kg MW in LEG and GRF, respectively. Therefore, according to the herbage use efficiency observed in our experiments, herbage allowance must reach 42 and 78 g DM/kg MW in LEG and GRF, respectively. When herbage allowance is lower, rabbits cannot meet the CP intake (13 g/kg MW) required for this weight gain objective.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooke, BD 2014. Daily food intake of free-ranging wild rabbits in semiarid South Australia. Wildlife Research 41, 141148.Google Scholar
Delagarde, R, Prache, S, D’Hour, P and Petit, M 2001. Ingestion de l’herbe par les ruminants au pâturage. Fourrages 166, 189212.Google Scholar
Fernández-Carmona, J, Cervera, C and Blas, E 1996. Prediction of the energy value of rabbit feeds varying widely in fibre content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64, 6175.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T 2015. Le lapin. De la biologie à l'élevage. Quae, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T and Lebas, F 2006. Feeding behaviour in rabbits. In Feeding in domestic vertebrates: from structure to behaviour (ed. V Bels), pp. 179209. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Goby, J-P, Huck, C, Fortun-Lamothe, L and Gidenne, T 2013. Intake growth and digestion of the growing rabbit fed alfalfa hay or green whole carrot: first results. In Proceedings of the 3rd ARPA Conference, 27–29 August 2013, Bali, Indonesia, p. 76.Google Scholar
ITAB 2010. Lapin bio une filère attentive et volontaire. Alter Agri 100, 2627.Google Scholar
Legendre, H, Hoste, H and Gidenne, T 2017. Nutritive value and anthelmintic effect of sainfoin pellets fed to experimentally infected growing rabbits. Animal 11, 14641471.Google Scholar
Martin, G, Duprat, A, Goby, J-P, Theau, J-P, Roinsard, A, Descombes, M, Legendre, H and Gidenne, T 2016. Herbage intake regulation and growth of rabbits raised on grasslands: back to basics and looking forward. Animal 10, 16091618.Google Scholar
Mugnai, C, Dal Bosco, A, Cardinali, R, Rebollar, P, Moscati, L and Castellini, C 2014. Effect of pasture availability and genotype on welfare, immune function, performance and meat characteristics of growing rabbits. World Rabbit Science 22, 2939.Google Scholar
Pérez-Prieto, LA and Delagarde, R 2013. Meta-analysis of the effect of pasture allowance on pasture intake, milk production, and grazing behavior of dairy cows grazing temperate grasslands. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 66716689.Google Scholar
Peyraud, JL and Delagarde, R 2011. Managing variations in dairy cow nutrient supply under grazing. Animal 7, 5767.Google Scholar
Seltmann, MW, Ruf, T and Rödel, HG 2009. Effects of body mass and huddling on resting metabolic rates of post-weaned European rabbits under different simulated weather conditions. Functional Ecology 23, 10701080.Google Scholar
van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.Google Scholar
Xiccato, G and Trocino, A 2010. Energy and protein metabolism and requirements. Nutrition of the Rabbit 2, 83118.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Legendre et al. supplementary material 1

Legendre et al. supplementary material

Download Legendre et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 14.6 KB