Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?

  • R. B. D’Eath (a1), G. Arnott (a1) (a2), S. P. Turner (a1), T. Jensen (a3), H. P. Lahrmann (a3), M. E. Busch (a3), J. K. Niemi (a4), A. B. Lawrence (a1) and P. Sandøe (a5)...
Abstract

Tail biting is a serious animal welfare and economic problem in pig production. Tail docking, which reduces but does not eliminate tail biting, remains widespread. However, in the EU tail docking may not be used routinely, and some ‘alternative’ forms of pig production and certain countries do not allow tail docking at all. Against this background, using a novel approach focusing on research where tail injuries were quantified, we review the measures that can be used to control tail biting in pigs without tail docking. Using this strict criterion, there was good evidence that manipulable substrates and feeder space affect damaging tail biting. Only epidemiological evidence was available for effects of temperature and season, and the effect of stocking density was unclear. Studies suggest that group size has little effect, and the effects of nutrition, disease and breed require further investigation. The review identifies a number of knowledge gaps and promising avenues for future research into prevention and mitigation. We illustrate the diversity of hypotheses concerning how different proposed risk factors might increase tail biting through their effect on each other or on the proposed underlying processes of tail biting. A quantitative comparison of the efficacy of different methods of provision of manipulable materials, and a review of current practices in countries and assurance schemes where tail docking is banned, both suggest that daily provision of small quantities of destructible, manipulable natural materials can be of considerable benefit. Further comparative research is needed into materials, such as ropes, which are compatible with slatted floors. Also, materials which double as fuel for anaerobic digesters could be utilised. As well as optimising housing and management to reduce risk, it is important to detect and treat tail biting as soon as it occurs. Early warning signs before the first bloody tails appear, such as pigs holding their tails tucked under, could in future be automatically detected using precision livestock farming methods enabling earlier reaction and prevention of tail damage. However, there is a lack of scientific studies on how best to respond to outbreaks: the effectiveness of, for example, removing biters and/or bitten pigs, increasing enrichment, or applying substances to tails should be investigated. Finally, some breeding companies are exploring options for reducing the genetic propensity to tail bite. If these various approaches to reduce tail biting are implemented we propose that the need for tail docking will be reduced.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: rick.death@sruc.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

X Averós , L Brossard , JY Dourmad , KH De Greef , HL Edge , SA Edwards and MC Meunier-Salaün 2010. A meta-analysis of the combined effect of housing and environmental enrichment characteristics on the behaviour and performance of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127, 7385.

SA Barnett 1965. Genotype and environment in tail length in mice. Experimental Physiology 50, 417429.

VE Beattie , K Breuer , NE O’Connell , IA Sneddon , JT Mercer , KA Rance , MEM Sutcliffe and SA Edwards 2005. Factors identifying pigs predisposed to tail biting. Animal Science 80, 307312.

VE Beattie , IA Sneddon , N Walker and RN Weatherup 2001. Environmental enrichment of intensive pig housing using spent mushroom compost. Animal Science 72, 3542.

P Bijma , WA Muir and JAM van Arendonk 2007a. Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175, 277288.

P Bijma , WM Muir , ED Ellen , JB Wolf and JAM van Arendonk 2007b. Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175, 289299.

JK Blackshaw 1981. Some behavioural deviations in weaned domestic pigs: persistent inguinal nose thrusting, and tail and ear biting. Animal Production 33, 325332.

HLI Bornett , JH Guy and PJ Cain 2003. Impact of animal welfare on costs and viability of pig production in the UK. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 16, 163186.

MBM Bracke , B Hulsegge , L Keeling and HJ Blokhuis 2004. Decision support system with semantic model to assess the risk of tail biting in pigs. 2. ‘Validation’. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 4554.

MBM Bracke , JJ Zonderland , P Lenskens , WGP Schouten , H Vermeer , HAM Spoolder , HJM Hendriks and H Hopster 2006. Formalised review of environmental enrichment for pigs in relation to political decision making. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98, 165182.

EA Branford Oltenacu and WJ Boylan 1974. Inheritance of tail length in crossbred Finnsheep. Journal of Heredity 65, 331334.

K Breuer , MEM Sutcliffe , JT Mercer , KA Rance , VE Beattie , IA Sneddon and SA Edwards 2003. The effect of breed on the development of adverse social behaviours in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84, 5974.

K Breuer , MEM Sutcliffe , JT Mercer , KA Rance , NE O’Connell , IA Sneddon and SA Edwards 2005. Heritability of clinical tail-biting and its relation to performance traits. Livestock Production Science 93, 8794.

E Brunberg , P Jensen , A Isaksson and LJ Keeling 2013a. Brain gene expression differences are associated with abnormal tail biting behavior in pigs. Genes, Brain, and Behavior 12, 275281.

E Brunberg , A Wallenbeck and LJ Keeling 2011. Tail biting in fattening pigs: associations between frequency of tail biting and other abnormal behaviours. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133, 1825.

E Brunberg , P Jensen , A Isaksson and LJ Keeling 2013b. Behavioural and brain gene expression profiling in pigs during tail biting outbreaks – evidence of a tail biting resistant phenotype. PLoS One 8, e66513.

I Camerlink , P Bijma , B Kemp and JE Bolhuis 2012. Relationship between growth rate and oral manipulation, social nosing, and aggression in finishing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 142, 1117.

L Canario , S Mignon-Grasteau , M Dupont-Nivet and F Phocas 2013. Genetics of behavioural adaptation of livestock to farming conditions. Animal 7, 357377.

A Costa , G Ismayilova , F Borgonovo , T Leroy , D Berckmans and M Guarino 2013. The use of image analysis as a new approach to assess behaviour classification in a pig barn. Acta Veterinaria Brno 82, 2530.

MS Dawkins , HJ Lee , CD Waitt and SJ Roberts 2009. Optical flow patterns in broiler chicken flocks as automated measures of behaviour and gait. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119, 203209.

JEL Day , A Burfoot , CM Docking , X Whittaker , HAM Spoolder and SA Edwards 2002. The effects of prior experience of straw and the level of straw provision on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76, 189202.

JEL Day , HAV De Weerd and SA Edwards 2008. The effect of varying lengths of straw bedding on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109, 249260.

KH De Greef , HM Vermeer , HWJ Houwers and AP Bos 2011. Proof of principle of the comfort class concept in pigs. Experimenting in the midst of a stakeholder process on pig welfare. Livestock Science 139, 172185.

SA Edwards 2006. Tail biting in pigs: understanding the intractable problem. Veterinary Journal 171, 198199.

JJR Feddes and D Fraser 1994. Non-nutritive chewing by pigs: implications for tail-biting and behavioural enrichment. Transactions of the ASAE 37, 947950.

D Fraser 1987a. Attraction to blood as a factor in tail-biting by pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17, 6186.

D Fraser 1987b. Mineral-deficient diets and the pig’s attraction to blood: implications for tail-biting. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67, 909918.

D Fraser , DE Bernon and RO Ball 1991. Enhanced attraction to blood by pigs with inadequate dietary-protein supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71, 611619.

R Geers , B Dellaert , V Goedseels , A Hoogerbrugge , E Vranken , F Maes and D Berckmans 1989. An assessment of optimal air temperatures in pig houses by the quantification of behavioral and health-related problems. Animal Production 48, 571578.

L Georgsson and J Svendsen 2001. One or two feeders for groups of 16 growing-finishing pigs: effects on health and production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science 51, 257264.

L Georgsson and J Svendsen 2002. Degree of competition at feeding differentially affects behavior and performance of group-housed growing-finishing pigs of different relative weights. Journal of Animal Science 80, 376383.

TL Goldberg , RM Weigel , EC Hahn and G Scherba 2000. Associations between genetics, farm characteristics and clinical disease in field outbreaks of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 43, 293302.

JH Guy , P Rowlinson , JP Chadwick and M Ellis 2002. Behaviour of two genotypes of growing/finishing pig in three different housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 193206.

LL Hansen , AM Hagelsø and A Madsen 1982. Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed ad libitum from one or several self-feeders. Applied Animal Ethology 8, 307333.

S Harley , S More , N O’Connell , A Hanlon , D Teixeira and L Boyle 2012. Evaluating the prevalence of tail biting and carcase condemnations in slaughter pigs in the Republic and Northern Ireland, and the potential of abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Veterinary Record 171, 621662.

L Holm , MB Jensen , LJ Pedersen and J Ladewig 2008. The importance of a food feedback in rooting materials for pigs measured by double demand curves with and without a common scaling factor. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 6884.

JM Howell and PB Siegel 1966. Morphological effects of the Manx factor in cats. Journal of Heredity 57, 100104.

EJ Hunter , TA Jones , HJ Guise , RHC Penny and S Hoste 2001. The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices. Veterinary Journal 161, 7279.

MB Jensen and LJ Pedersen 2007. The value assigned to six different rooting materials by growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108, 3144.

MB Jensen , M Studnitz , U Halekoh , LJ Pedersen and E Jorgensen 2008. Pigs’ preferences for rooting materials measured in a three-choice maze-test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112, 270283.

MB Jensen , M Studnitz and LJ Pedersen 2010. The effect of type of rooting material and space allowance on exploration and abnormal behaviour in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123, 8792.

T Jensen , AL Riis , H Maribo , A Vernersen and ME Busch 2004. Halebid manual (tail-biting manual). Videncenter for Svineproduktion og danske slagterier, Copenhagen, Denmark.

LJ Keeling , A Wallenbeck , A Larsen and N Holmgren 2012. Scoring tail damage in pigs: an evaluation based on recordings at Swedish slaughterhouses. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 54, 32.

M Kiley-Worthington 1976. Tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays. Behaviour 56, 69115.

JL Krider , JL Albright , MP Plumlee , JH Conrad , CL Sinclair , L Underwood , RG Jones and RB Harrington 1975. Magnesium supplementation, space and docking effects on swine performance and behavior. Journal of Animal Science 40, 10271033.

SK Kritas and RB Morrison 2007. Relationships between tail biting in pigs and disease lesions and condemnations at slaughter. Veterinary Record 160, 149152.

HJ Lee , SJ Roberts , KA Drake and MS Dawkins 2011. Prediction of feather damage in laying hens using optical flows and Markov models. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 8, 489499.

G Manteuffel , B Puppe and PC Schon 2004. Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 88, 163182.

JWM Merks , PK Mathur and EF Knol 2012. New phenotypes for new breeding goals in pigs. Animal 6, 535543.

C Moinard , M Mendl , CJ Nicol and LE Green 2003. A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 333355.

C Munsterhjelm , E Brunberg , M Heinonen , L Keeling and A Valros 2013. Stress measures in tail biters and bitten pigs in a matched case-control study. Animal Welfare 22, 331338.

C Munsterhjelm , OAT Peltoniemi , M Heinonen , O Halli , M Karhapaa and A Valros 2009. Experience of moderate bedding affects behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118, 4253.

PA Palander , M Heinonen , I Simpura , SA Edwards and AE Valros 2013. Jejunal morphology and blood metabolites in tail biting, victim and control pigs. Animal 7, 15231531.

V Petersen , HB Simonsen and LG Lawson 1995. The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behaviour in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45, 215224.

J Rushen , N Chapinal and A de Passille 2012. Automated monitoring of behavioural-based animal welfare indicators. Animal Welfare 21, 339350.

M Sanchez and JL Gonzalez 2005. The fertilizer value of pig slurry. I. Values depending on the type of operation. Bioresource Technology 96, 11171123.

CJM Scheepens , MJC Hessing , E Laarakker , WGP Schouten and MJM Tielen 1991. Influences of intermittent daily draft on the behaviour of weaned pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31, 6982.

SA Schmolke , YZ Li and HW Gonyou 2003. Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 874878.

DL Schroder-Petersen , T Heiskanen and AK Ersboll 2004. Tail-in-mouth behaviour in slaughter pigs, in relation to internal factors such as: age, size, gender, and motivational background. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science 54, 159166.

DL Schrøder-Petersen and HB Simonsen 2001. Tail biting in pigs. Veterinary Journal 162, 196210.

A Scollo , G Di Martino , L Bonfanti , AL Stefani , E Schiavon , S Marangon and F Gottardo 2013. Tail docking and the rearing of heavy pigs: the role played by gender and the presence of straw in the control of tail biting. Blood parameters, behaviour and skin lesions. Research in Veterinary Science 95, 825830.

K Scott , DJ Chennells , D Armstrong , L Taylor , BP Gill and SA Edwards 2007. The welfare of finishing pigs under different housing and feeding systems: liquid versus dry feeding in fully-slatted and straw-based housing. Animal Welfare 16, 5362.

K Scott , L Taylor , BP Gill and SA Edwards 2009. Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems 3. Hanging toy versus rootable toy of the same material. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 186190.

H Sihvo , O Simola , C Munsterhjelm and P Syrja 2012. Systemic spread of infection in tail-bitten pigs. Journal of Comparative Pathology 146, 73.

HB Simonsen 1995. Effect of early rearing environment and tail docking on later behaviour and production in fattening pigs. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science 45, 139144.

A Sinisalo , JK Niemi , M Heinonen and A Valros 2012. Tail biting and production performance in fattening pigs. Livestock Science 143, 220225.

P Statham , L Green , M Bichard and M Mendl 2009. Predicting tail-biting from behaviour of pigs prior to outbreaks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 157164.

P Statham , L Green and M Mendl 2011. A longitudinal study of the effects of providing straw at different stages of life on tail-biting and other behaviour in commercially housed pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 134, 100108.

S Stern , U Sonesson , S Gunnarsson , I Öborn , KI Kumm and T Nybrant 2005. Sustainable development of food production: a case study on scenarios for pig production. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 34, 402407.

BR Street and HW Gonyou 2008. Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior, and physiological variables. Journal of Animal Science 86, 982991.

M Studnitz , MB Jensen and LJ Pedersen 2007. Why do pigs root and in what will they root? A review on the exploratory behaviour of pigs in relation to environmental enrichment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107, 183197.

MA Sutherland and CB Tucker 2011. The long and short of it: a review of tail docking in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 179191.

NR Taylor , DCJ Main , M Mendl and SA Edwards 2010. Tail-biting: a new perspective. The Veterinary Journal 186, 137147.

NR Taylor , RMA Parker , M Mendl , SA Edwards and DCJ Main 2012. Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies. The Veterinary Journal 194, 7783.

H Telkänranta , K Swan , H Hirvonen and A Valros 2014b. Chewable materials before weaning reduce tail biting in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science (in press http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.01.004).

D Temple , V Courboulay , A Velarde , A Dalmau and X Manteca 2012. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Animal Welfare 21, 257271.

SL Trickett , JH Guy and SA Edwards 2009. The role of novelty in environmental enrichment for the weaned pig. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 4551.

SP Turner 2011. Breeding against harmful social behaviours in pigs and chickens: state of the art and the way forward. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 134, 19.

FAM Tuyttens 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 261282.

A Valros , S Ahlstrom , H Rintala , T Hakkinen and H Saloniemi 2004. The prevalence of tail damage in slaughter pigs in Finland and associations to carcass condemnations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science 54, 213219.

HA Van de Weerd and JEL Day 2009. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 120.

HA Van de Weerd , CM Docking , JEL Day , PJ Avery and SA Edwards 2003. A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84, 101118.

HA Van de Weerd , CM Docking , JEL Day , K Breuer and SA Edwards 2006. Effects of species-relevant environmental enrichment on the behaviour and productivity of finishing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99, 230247.

HA Van de Weerd , CM Docking , JEL Day and SA Edwards 2005. The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing systems. Animal Science 80, 289298.

A Wallenbeck and LJ Keeling 2013. Using data from electronic feeders on visit frequency and feed consumption to indicate tail biting outbreaks in commercial pig production. Journal of Animal Science 91, 28792884.

K Wilson , R Zanella , C Ventura , HL Johansen , T Framstad , A Janczak , AJ Zanella and HL Neibergs 2012. Identification of chromosomal locations associated with tail biting and being a victim of tail-biting behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus). Journal of Applied Genetics 53, 449456.

JJ Zonderland , MBM Bracke , LA den Hartog , B Kemp and HAM Spoolder 2010a. Gender effects on tail damage development in single- or mixed-sex groups of weaned piglets. Livestock Science 129, 151158.

JJ Zonderland , B Kemp , MBM Bracke , LA den Hartog and HAM Spoolder 2010b. Individual piglets’ contribution to the development of tail biting. Animal 5, 601607.

JJ Zonderland , F Schepers , MBM Bracke , LA den Hartog , B Kemp and HAM Spoolder 2011. Characteristics of biter and victim piglets apparent before a tail-biting outbreak. Animal 5, 767775.

JJ Zonderland , JW van Riel , MBM Bracke , B Kemp , LA den Hartog and HAM Spoolder 2009. Tail posture predicts tail damage among weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 165170.

JJ Zonderland , M Wolthuis-Fillerup , CG Van Reenen , MBM Bracke , B Kemp , LA den Hartog and HAM Spoolder 2008. Prevention and treatment of tail biting in weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 269281.

B Zwicker , L Gygax , B Wechsler and R Weber 2012. Influence of the accessibility of straw in racks on exploratory behaviour in finishing pigs. Livestock Science 148, 6773.

B Zwicker , L Gygax , B Wechsler and R Weber 2013. Short- and long-term effects of eight enrichment materials on the behaviour of finishing pigs fed ad libitum or restrictively. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144, 3138.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

D’Eath Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Word (43 KB)
43 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 40
Total number of PDF views: 399 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 903 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.