Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Raszek, Mikolaj M. Guan, Le L. and Plastow, Graham S. 2016. Use of Genomic Tools to Improve Cattle Health in the Context of Infectious Diseases. Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 7,


    Yudin, N. S. Lukyanov, K. I. Voevoda, M. I. and Kolchanov, N. A. 2016. Application of reproductive technologies to improve dairy cattle genomic selection. Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 321.


    2016. Genomic Selection in Animals.


    Boichard, D. Ducrocq, V. and Fritz, S. 2015. Sustainable dairy cattle selection in the genomic era. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Vol. 132, Issue. 2, p. 135.


    Cros, David Denis, Marie Bouvet, Jean-Marc and Sánchez, Leopoldo 2015. Long-term genomic selection for heterosis without dominance in multiplicative traits: case study of bunch production in oil palm. BMC Genomics, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,


    Gao, Ning Li, Jiaqi He, Jinlong Xiao, Guang Luo, Yuanyu Zhang, Hao Chen, Zanmou and Zhang, Zhe 2015. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model. BMC Genetics, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,


    Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M. and Zhao, Xin 2015. Epigenetic marks: regulators of livestock phenotypes and conceivable sources of missing variation in livestock improvement programs. Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 6,


    Jimenez-Sanchez, Gerardo and Scoles, G.J. 2015. Genomics innovation: transforming healthcare, business, and the global economy1. Genome, Vol. 58, Issue. 12, p. 511.


    Jonas, Elisabeth and Koning, Dirk-Jan de 2015. Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs. Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 6,


    Henryon, M. Berg, P. and Sørensen, A.C. 2014. Animal-breeding schemes using genomic information need breeding plans designed to maximise long-term genetic gains. Livestock Science, Vol. 166, p. 38.


    Kadarmideen, Haja N. 2014. Genomics to systems biology in animal and veterinary sciences: Progress, lessons and opportunities. Livestock Science, Vol. 166, p. 232.


    Muir, William M. Cheng, Heng-Wei and Croney, Candace 2014. Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations. Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 5,


    Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Weigel, Kent A. Young, Amy E. Cleveland, Matthew A. and Dekkers, Jack C.M. 2014. Applied Animal Genomics: Results from the Field. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 105.


    ×

Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review

  • A. Bouquet (a1) and J. Juga (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002248
  • Published online: 03 December 2012
Abstract

Extensive genetic progress has been achieved in dairy cattle populations on many traits of economic importance because of efficient breeding programmes. Success of these programmes has relied on progeny testing of the best young males to accurately assess their genetic merit and hence their potential for breeding. Over the last few years, the integration of dense genomic information into statistical tools used to make selection decisions, commonly referred to as genomic selection, has enabled gains in predicting accuracy of breeding values for young animals without own performance. The possibility to select animals at an early stage allows defining new breeding strategies aimed at boosting genetic progress while reducing costs. The first objective of this article was to review methods used to model and optimize breeding schemes integrating genomic selection and to discuss their relative advantages and limitations. The second objective was to summarize the main results and perspectives on the use of genomic selection in practical breeding schemes, on the basis of the example of dairy cattle populations. Two main designs of breeding programmes integrating genomic selection were studied in dairy cattle. Genomic selection can be used either for pre-selecting males to be progeny tested or for selecting males to be used as active sires in the population. The first option produces moderate genetic gains without changing the structure of breeding programmes. The second option leads to large genetic gains, up to double those of conventional schemes because of a major reduction in the mean generation interval, but it requires greater changes in breeding programme structure. The literature suggests that genomic selection becomes more attractive when it is coupled with embryo transfer technologies to further increase selection intensity on the dam-to-sire pathway. The use of genomic information also offers new opportunities to improve preservation of genetic variation. However, recent simulation studies have shown that putting constraints on genomic inbreeding rates for defining optimal contributions of breeding animals could significantly reduce achievable genetic gain. Finally, the article summarizes the potential of genomic selection to include new traits in the breeding goal to meet societal demands regarding animal health and environmental efficiency in animal production.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: alban.bouquet@gmail.com
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G Abdel-Azim , S Schnell 2007. Genetic impacts of using female-sorted semen in commercial herds. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 15541563.

JS Agerholm , C Bendixen , O Andersen , J Arnbjerg 2001. Complex vertebral malformation in Holstein calves. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 13, 283289.

JWM Bastiaansen , A Costar , MPL Calus , JAM van Arendonk , H Bovenhuis 2012. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genetics Selection Evolution 44, 3.

RF Brøndum , E Rius-Vilarrasa , I Strandén , G Su , B Gulbrandtsen , WF Fikse , MS Lund 2011. Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 47004707.

LH Buch , MK Sørensen , P Berg , LD Pedersen , AC Sørensen 2012a. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of bulls on genetic gain. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 129, 138151.

MPL Calus , RF Veerkamp 2011. Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 26.

HD Daetwyler , B Villanueva , P Bijma , JA Woolliams 2007. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 369376.

HD Daetwyler , R Pong-Wong , B Villanueva , JA Woolliams 2010. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185, 10211031.

R Dassonneville , RF Brøndum , T Druet , S Fritz , F Guillaume , B Guldbrandtsen , MS Lund , V Ducrocq , G Su 2011. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 36793686.

MAR de Cara , J Fernandez , MA Toro , B Villanueva 2011. Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes. Journal of animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 456464.

JCM Dekkers 2007. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 331341.

APW de Roos , C Schrooten , RF Veerkamp , JAM Van Arendonk 2011. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 15591567.

KA Engelsma , RF Veerkamp , MPL Calus , JJ Windig 2011. Consequences when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 473481.

M Georges , JM Massey 1991. Velogenetics, or the synergistic use of marker-assisted selection and germ-line manipulation. Theriogenology 35, 151159.

ME Goddard 2009. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Genetica 136, 245257.

ME Goddard , BJ Hayes , THE Meuwissen 2011. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 409421.

BL Harris , DL Johnson 2010. Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 12431252.

BJ Hayes , PJ Bowman , AJ Chamberlain , ME Goddard 2009. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433443.

P Humblot , D Le Bourhis , S Fritz , JJ Colleau , C Gonzalez , C Guyader-Joly , A Malafosse , Y Heyman , Y Amigues , M Tissier , C Ponsart 2010. Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle. Veterinary Medicine International 2010, e192787.

XS Hu , B Li 2006. Additive genetic variation and the distribution of QTN effects among sites. Journal of Theoretical Biology 243, 7685.

N Ibanez-Escriche , O Gonzalez-Recio 2011. Promises, pitfalls and challenges in genomic selection in breeding programs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural research 9, 404413.

S König , HH Swalve 2009. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 52925303.

S König , H Simianer , A Willam 2009. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programmes. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 382391.

M Lillehammer , THE Meuwissen , AK Sonesson 2011. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 493500.

MS Lund , APW de Roos , AG de Vries , T Druet , V Ducrocq , S Fritz , G Guillaume , B Guldbrandtsen , Z Liu , R Reents , C Schrooten , M Seefried , G Su 2011. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 43.

TFC Mackay , EA Stone , JF Ayroles 2009. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nature Reviews Genetics 10, 565577.

N McHugh , THE Meuwissen , AR Cromie , AK Sonesson 2011. Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 41094118.

THE Meuwissen 1997. Maximizing the response to selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75, 934940.

THE Meuwissen 2009. Accuracy of breeding values of ‘unrelated’ individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 35.

WM Muir 2007. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 342355.

LD Pedersen , M Kargo , P Berg , J Voergaard , LH Buch , AC Sørensen 2012. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle breeding programmes: sexed semen cannot replace multiple ovulation and embryo transfer as superior reproductive technology. Journal of animal Breeding and Genetics 129, 152163.

JE Pryce , ME Goddard , HW Raadsma , BJ Hayes 2010. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 54555466.

JE Pryce , HD Daetwyler 2012. Designing dairy cattle breeding schemes under genomic selection: a review of internation research. Animal Production Science 52, 107114.

M Pszczola , T Strabel , HA Mulder , MPL Calus 2012. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 389400.

LR Schaeffer 2006. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123, 218223.

JM Schefers , KA Weigel 2012. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Animal Frontiers 2, 49.

M Soller 1978. The use of loci associated with quantitative effects in dairy cattle improvement. Animal Production 27, 133139.

G Su , B Guldbrandtsen , BR Gregersen , MS Lund 2010. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 11751183.

B Villanueva , R Pong-Wong , J Fernandez , MA Toro 2005. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model. Journal of Animal Science 83, 17471752.

KA Weigel , G de Los Campos , AI Vazquez , GJ Rosa , D Gianola , CP Van Tassel 2010. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 54235435.

GR Wiggans , PM VanRaden , TA Cooper 2011. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 32023211.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: