Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Invited review: The evolution of cattle bioacoustics and application for advanced dairy systems

  • A. C. Green (a1), I. N. Johnston (a2) and C. E. F. Clark (a1)
Abstract

Vocalisations are commonly expressed by gregarious animals, including cattle, as a form of short- and long-distance communication. They can provide conspecifics with meaningful information about the physiology, affective state and physical attributes of the caller. In cattle, calls are individually distinct meaning they assist animals to identify specific individuals in the herd. Consequently, there is potential for these vocalisations to be acoustically analysed to make inferences about how individual animals or herds are coping with their external surroundings, and then act on these signals to improve feed conversion efficiency, reproductive efficiency and welfare. In the case of dairy farming, where herd sizes are expanding and farmers are becoming more reliant on technologies to assist in the monitoring of cattle, the study of vocal behaviour could provide an objective, cost effective and non-invasive alternative to traditional measures of welfare. The vocalisations of cattle in response to calf separation, social isolation and painful husbandry procedures, alongside changes to feeding and oestrous activity are here reviewed. For future application of sound technology, research is first necessary to analyse the acoustic structure of cattle vocalisations and determine the specific information they encode. This review draws together the latest research in field of cattle bioacoustics highlighting how the source–filter theory and affective state dimensional approach can be adopted to decode this information and improve on-farm management.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Invited review: The evolution of cattle bioacoustics and application for advanced dairy systems
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Invited review: The evolution of cattle bioacoustics and application for advanced dairy systems
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Invited review: The evolution of cattle bioacoustics and application for advanced dairy systems
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: a.green@sydney.edu.au
References
Hide All
Amsel, A 1992. Frustration theory – an analysis of dispositional learning and memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Barfield, CH, Tang-martinez, Z and Trainer, JM 1994. Domestic calves (Bos taurus) recognize their own mothers by auditory cues. Ethology 97, 257264.
Barkema, HW, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Kastelic, JP, Lam, TJGM, Luby, C, Roy, JP, LeBlanc, SJ, Keefe, GP and Kelton, DF 2015. Invited review: changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 74267445.
Boissy, A, Manteuffel, G, Jensen, MB, Moe, RO, Spruijt, B, Keeling, LJ, Winckler, C, Forkman, B, Dimitrov, I, Langbein, J, Bakken, M, Veissier, I and Aubert, A 2007. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology & Behavior 92, 375397.
Bradbury, JW and Vehrencamp, SL 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA.
Briefer, E and McElligott, AG 2011. Indicators of age, body size and sex in goat kid calls revealed using the source-filter theory. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133, 175185.
Briefer, EF 2012. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. Journal of Zoology 288, 120.
Briefer, EF, Maigrot, A-L, Mandel, R, Freymond, SB, Bachmann, I and Hillmann, E 2015a. Segregation of information about emotional arousal and valence in horse whinnies. Scientific Reports 4, 99899989.
Briefer, EF, Tettamanti, F and McElligott, AG 2015b. Emotions in goats: mapping physiological, behavioural and vocal profiles. Animal Behaviour 99, 131143.
Caray, D, de Boyer des Roches, A, Frouja, S, Andanson, S and Veissier, I 2015. Hot-iron disbudding: stress responses and behavior of 1- and 4-week-old calves receiving anti-inflammatory analgesia without or with sedation using xylazine. Livestock Science 179, 2228.
Chung, Y, Lee, J, Oh, S, Park, D, Chang, HH and Kim, S 2013. Automatic detection of cow’s oestrus in audio surveillance system. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26, 10301037.
Clark, CE, Lyons, NA, Millapan, L, Talukder, S, Cronin, GM, Kerrisk, KL and Garcia, SC 2015. Rumination and activity levels as predictors of calving for dairy cows. Animal 9, 691695.
Düpjan, S, Schön, P-C, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A and Manteuffel, G 2008. Differential vocal responses to physical and mental stressors in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114, 105115.
Færevik, G, Jensen, MB and Bøe, KE 2006. Dairy calves social preferences and the significance of a companion animal during separation from the group. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99, 205221.
Fant, G 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production: with calculations based on x-ray studies of Russian articulations. The Hague, Mouton, The Netherlands.
Flower, FC and Weary, DM 2001. Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70, 275284.
Grandin, T 1998. The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56, 121128.
Grandin, T 2001. Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71, 191201.
Hall, SJG, Vince, MA, Walser, ES and Garson, PJ 1988. Vocalisations of the Chillingham cattle. Behaviour 104, 78104.
Heffner, HE 1998. Auditory awareness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57, 259268.
Hopster, H, O’Connell, JM and Blokhuis, HJ 1995. Acute effects of cow-calf separation on heart rate, plasma cortisol and behaviour in multiparous dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44, 18.
Ikeda, Y and Ishii, Y 2008. Recognition of two psychological conditions of a single cow by her voice. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 62, 6772.
Jahns, G 2008. Call recognition to identify cow conditions – a call-recogniser translating calls to text. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 62, 5458.
Johnsen, JF, Ellingsen, K, Grøndahl, AM, Bøe, KE, Lidfors, L and Mejdell, CM 2015. The effect of physical contact between dairy cows and calves during separation on their post-separation behavioural response. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 166, 1119.
Kiley, M 1972. The vocalizations of ungulates, their causation and function. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 31, 171222.
Leliveld, LMC, Düpjan, S, Tuchscherer, A and Puppe, B 2016. Behavioural and physiological measures indicate subtle variations in the emotional valence of young pigs. Physiology & Behavior 157, 116124.
Lidfors, LM 1996. Behavioural effects of separating the dairy calf immediately or 4 days post-partum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 269283.
Linhart, P, Ratcliffe, VF, Reby, D and Spinka, M 2015. Expression of emotional arousal in two different piglet call types. PLoS One 10, e0135414.
Marchant-Forde, JN, Marchant-Forde, RM and Weary, DM 2002. Responses of dairy cows and calves to each other’s vocalisations after early separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78, 1928.
Meen, GH, Schellekens, MA, Slegers, MHM, Leenders, NLG, van Erp-van der Kooij, E and Noldus, LPJJ 2015. Sound analysis in dairy cattle vocalisation as a potential welfare monitor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 118, 111115.
Mendl, M, Burman, OHP and Paul, ES 2010. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277, 28952904.
Mueller, R and Schrader, L 2005. Behavioural consistency during social separation and personality in dairy cows. Behaviour 142, 12891306.
Padilla de la Torre, M, Briefer, EF, Reader, T and McElligott, AG 2015. Acoustic analysis of cattle (Bos taurus) mother–offspring contact calls from a source–filter theory perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 163, 5868.
Padilla de la Torre, M, Briefer, EF, Ochocki, BM, McElligott, AG and Reader, T 2016. Mother–offspring recognition via contact calls in cattle, Bos taurus. Animal Behaviour 114, 147154.
Puppe, B, Schön, PC, Tuchscherer, A and Manteuffel, G 2005. Castration-induced vocalisation in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 95, 6778.
Reby, D and McComb, K 2003. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal Behaviour 65, 519530.
Schloeth, R 1961. Das sozialleben des Camargue-Rindes. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 18, 574627.
Schön, PC, Hämel, K, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A, Kanitz, W and Manteuffel, G 2007. Altered vocalization rate during the estrous cycle in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 202206.
Schütz, KE, Cox, NR, Macdonald, KA, Roche, JR, Verkerk, GA, Rogers, AR, Tucker, CB, Matthews, LR, Meier, S and Webster, JR 2013. Behavioral and physiological effects of a short-term feed restriction in lactating dairy cattle with different body condition scores at calving. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 44654476.
Siebert, K, Langbein, J, Schön, PC, Tuchscherer, A and Puppe, B 2011. Degree of social isolation affects behavioural and vocal response patterns in dwarf goats (Capra hircus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 131, 5362.
Stěhulová, I, Lidfors, L and Špinka, M 2008. Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation: effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 144165.
Stilwell, G, Lima, MS and Broom, DM 2008. Comparing plasma cortisol and behaviour of calves dehorned with caustic paste after non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory analgesia. Livestock Science 119, 6369.
Taylor, AM and Reby, D 2010. The contribution of source-filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. Journal of Zoology 280, 221236.
Thomas, TJ, Weary, DM and Appleby, MC 2001. Newborn and 5-week-old calves vocalize in response to milk deprivation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74, 165173.
Titze, IR 1994. Principles of voice production. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
Valizaheh, R, Veira, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2008. Behavioural responses by dairy cows provided two hays of contrasting quality at dry-off. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109, 190200.
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 1999. Effects of restraint and branding on rates and acoustic parameters of vocalization in beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 125135.
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 2000. Vocal behaviour in cattle: the animal’s commentary on its biological processes and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 1533.
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 2001. The propensity of cattle to vocalise during handling and isolation is affected by phenotype. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74, 8195.
Watts, JM, Stookey, JM, Schmutz, SM and Waltz, CS 2001. Variability in vocal and behavioural responses to visual isolation between full-sibling families of beef calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70, 255273.
Weary, D, Braithwaite, L and Fraser, D 1998. Vocal response to pain in piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56, 161172.
Weary, DM and Chua, B 2000. Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69, 177188.
Whitlock, BK, Coffman, EA, Coetzee, JF and Daniel, JA 2012. Electroejaculation increased vocalization and plasma concentrations of cortisol and progesterone, but not substance P, in beef bulls. Theriogenology 78, 737746.
Wyman, MT, Mooring, MS, McCowan, B, Penedo, MCT, Reby, D and Hart, LA 2012. Acoustic cues to size and quality in the vocalizations of male North American bison, Bison bison . Animal Behaviour 84, 13811391.
Yajuvendra, S, Lathwal, SS, Rajput, N, Raja, TV, Gupta, AK, Mohanty, TK, Ruhil, AP, Chakravarty, AK, Sharma, PC, Sharma, V and Chandra, G 2013. Effective and accurate discrimination of individual dairy cattle through acoustic sensing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 146, 1118.
Yeon, SC, Jeon, JH, Houpt, KA, Chang, HH, Lee, HC and Lee, HJ 2006. Acoustic features of vocalizations of Korean native cows (Bos taurus coreanea) in two different conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 19.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed