Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain

  • H. Liu (a1), M. Henryon (a2) (a3) and A. C. Sørensen (a1)

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that mating strategies with genomic information realise lower rates of inbreeding (∆F) than with pedigree information without compromising rates of genetic gain (∆G). We used stochastic simulation to compare ∆F and ∆G realised by two mating strategies with pedigree and genomic information in five breeding schemes. The two mating strategies were minimum-coancestry mating (MC) and minimising the covariance between ancestral genetic contributions (MCAC). We also simulated random mating (RAND) as a reference point. Generations were discrete. Animals were truncation-selected for a single trait that was controlled by 2000 quantitative trait loci, and the trait was observed for all selection candidates before selection. The criterion for selection was genomic-breeding values predicted by a ridge-regression model. Our results showed that MC and MCAC with genomic information realised 6% to 22% less ∆F than MC and MCAC with pedigree information without compromising ∆G across breeding schemes. MC and MCAC realised similar ∆F and ∆G. In turn, MC and MCAC with genomic information realised 28% to 44% less ∆F and up to 14% higher ∆G than RAND. These results indicated that MC and MCAC with genomic information are more effective than with pedigree information in controlling rates of inbreeding. This implies that genomic information should be applied to more than just prediction of breeding values in breeding schemes with truncation selection.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Corresponding author

E-mail: Huiming.liu@mbg.au.dk

References

Hide All
Badke, YM, Bates, RO, Ernst, CW, Schwab, C and Steibel, JP 2012. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in four US pig breeds. BMC Genomics 13, 24.
Benoit, K 2011. Linear regression models with logarithmic transformations. London School of Economics and Political Science 18. Available at http://www.kenbenoit.net/courses/ME104/logmodels2.pdf
Bulmer, MG 1971. The effect of selection on genetic variability. The American Naturalist 105, 201211.
Caballero, A, Santiago, E and Toro, MA 1996. Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Animal Science 62, 431442.
Edwards, D 2015. Two molecular measures of relatedness based on haplotype sharing. BMC Bioinformatics 16, 383.
Grundy, B, Villanueva, B and Woolliams, JA 1998. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genetic Research 72, 159168.
Hayes, BJ and Goddard, ME 2001. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genetic Selection Evolution 33, 209229.
Hayes, BJ, Visscher, PM and Goddard, ME 2009. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realised relationship matrix. Genetics Research 91, 4760.
Henryon, M, Berg, P and Sorensen, AC 2014. Animal-breeding schemes using genomic information need breeding plans designed to maximise long-term genetic gains. Livestock Science 166, 3847.
Henryon, M, Sorensen, AC and Berg, P 2009. Mating animals by minimising the covariance between ancestral contributions generates less inbreeding without compromising genetic gain in breeding schemes with truncation selection. Animal 3, 13391346.
Lindgren, D and Matheson, AC 1986. An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genetica 35, 173177.
Liu, H, Meuwissen, TH, Sørensen, AC and Berg, P 2015. Upweighting rare favourable alleles increases long-term genetic gain in genomic selection programs. Genetics Selection Evolution 47, 3.
Meuwissen, THE 2007. Operation of conservation schemes. In Utilisation and conservation of farm animals genetic resources (ed. H Oldenbroek), pp. 167193. Wageningen Academic, the Netherlands.
Meuwissen, THE and Luo, Z 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 24, 305313.
Nirea, KG, Sonesson, AK, Woolliams, JA and Meuwissen, TH 2012. Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes. Genetics Selection Evolution 44, 11.
Son, J, Kang, H, Kim, J, Park, J and Lee, D 2014. Accuracy of genomic prediction in a simulated pig populations. Proceedings, 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 18–22 August 2014, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sonesson, AK and Meuwissen, TH 2000. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution 32, 231248.
Sørensen, AC, Berg, P and Woolliams, JA 2005. The advantage of factorial mating under selection is uncovered by deterministically predicted rates of inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution 37, 5781.
Speed, D and Balding, DJ 2015. Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful? Nature Review Genetics 16, 3344.
Sun, C, VanRaden, PM, O’Connell, JR, Weigel, KA and Gianola, D 2013. Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 80148023.
VanRaden, PM 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal Dairy Science 91, 44144423.
Woolliams, JA 2006. Designs and evaluations for managing genetic diversity in breeding programs, Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, Communication no. 30-01.
Woolliams, JA 2007. Genetic contributions and inbreeding. In Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources (ed. K Oldenbroek), pp. 147165. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Woolliams, JA, Bijma, P and Willanueva, B 1999. Expected genetic contributions and their impact on gene flow and genetic gain. Genetics 153, 10091020.
Woolliams, JA, Pong-Wong, R and Villanueva, B 2002. Strategic optimisation of short- and long-term gain and inbreeding in MAS and non-MAS schemes. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 19–23 August 2002, Montpelier, VT, France, pp. 155-–162.
Woolliams, JA and Thompson, R 1994. A theory of genetic contributions. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 7–12 August 1994, Guelph, ON, Canada, pp. 127–134.
Wright, S 1921. Systems of mating. Genetics 6, 111178.
Yang, J, Benyamin, B, McEvoy, BP, Gordon, S, Henders, AK, Nyholt, DR, Madden, PA, Heath, AC, Martin, NG, Montgomery, GW et al 2010. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics 42, 565569.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Liu supplementary material
Liu supplementary material 1

 Word (111 KB)
111 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed