Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:36:27.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mid-season targeted selective anthelmintic treatment based on flexible weight gain threshold for nematode infection control in dairy calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2017

A. Merlin ,
N. Ravinet ,
A. Madouasse ,
N. Bareille ,
A. Chauvin  and
C. Chartier
A. Merlin*
Affiliation:
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44 307 Nantes, France
N. Ravinet
Affiliation:
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44 307 Nantes, France
A. Madouasse
Affiliation:
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44 307 Nantes, France
N. Bareille
Affiliation:
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44 307 Nantes, France
A. Chauvin
Affiliation:
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44 307 Nantes, France
C. Chartier
Affiliation:
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44 307 Nantes, France
*
†E-mail: aurelie.merlin@oniris-nantes.fr, aurel.merlin@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The suitability of a single mid-season targeted selective treatment (TST) for gastrointestinal nematodes control, based on flexible average daily weight gain (ADWG) thresholds, was investigated in 23 groups of first grazing season calves. In each group, animals were weighed three times: before turnout, at mid-season and at housing. Just after the first weighing, each group was divided in two homogenous sub-groups in terms of age, breed and weight, and randomly allocated to one of two sub-groups intented for two different mid-season anthelmintic treatment strategies: (1) a treatment of all calves composing the sub-group (whole-group treatment (WT)) or (2) a targeted selective weight gain-based treatment (TST) of the animals showing an individual pre-treatment ADWG inferior to the mean pre-treatment ADWG of the corresponding WT sub-group. Anthelmintic treatment (levamisole 7.5 mg/kg BW) was performed 3 to 4 months after turnout. At housing, two parasitological parameters (the anti-Ostertagia ostertagi antibody level-Ostertagia optical density ratio (ODR) and the pepsinogen level) and a clinical parameter (the breech soiling score) were assessed at individual level in each group. Then, the high exposed groups to gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) were defined as groups for which untreated animals exhibited a mean Ostertagia ODR ⩾0.7 and among these groups, the ones characterized by high abomasal damage due to Ostertagia for which untreated animals exhibited a mean pepsinogen level ⩾2.5 U Tyr were also identified. Among TST sub-groups, the treatment ADWG thresholds varied from 338 to 941 g/day and the percentage of treated animals from 28% to 75%. Pre- and post-treatment ADWG as well as parasitological and clinical parameters measured at housing were similar between TST and WT sub-groups including the 17 high exposed groups to GIN. Within these 17 groups, the treatment allowed to significantly improve post-treatment ADWG compared with untreated animals. In the six high exposed groups showing mean pepsinogen level ⩾2.5 U Tyr, the average effect of treatment on post-treatment ADWG was the highest and estimated up to 14 kg after a grazing duration of 4 months. In contrast, in six other groups showing mean Ostertagia ODR<0.7 in untreated animals, no effect of treatment was seen suggesting an absence of production losses related to a low level of GIN infection. This study highlighted the suitability of a convenient mid-season TST strategy for first grazing season calves, based on the use of flexible thresholds of ADWG, allowing similar growth compared with a whole-group treatment while keeping a GIN population in refugia.

Keywords

targeted selective treatmentgastrointestinal nematodescattleaverage daily weight gaingrazing management
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , May 2018 , pp. 1030 - 1040
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armour, J and Duncan, M 1987. Arrested larval development in cattle nematodes. Parasitology Today 3, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennema, SC, Vercruysse, J, Morgan, E, Stafford, K, Höglund, J, Demeler, J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G and Charlier, J 2010. Epidemiology and risk factors for exposure to gastrointestinal nematodes in dairy herds in Northwestern Europe. Veterinary Parasitology 173, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, Z, Laurenson, YCSM, Forbes, AB and Kyriazakis, I 2016. Modelling the consequences of targeted selective treatment strategies on performance and emergence of anthelmintic resistance amongst grazing calves. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance 6, 258–271.Google ScholarPubMed
Charlier, J, Demeler, J, Höglund, J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G, Dorny, P and Vercruysse, J 2010. Ostertagia ostertagi in first-season grazing in Belgium, Germany and Sweden: general levels of infection and related management practices. Veterinary Parasitology 171, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, J, Dorny, P, Levecke, B, Demeler, J, von Samson-Himmerlstjerna, G, Höglund, J and Vercruysse, J 2011. Serum pepsinogen levels to monitor gastrointestinal nematode infections in cattle revisited. Research in Veterinary Science 90, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, J, van der Voort, M, Kenyon, F, Skuce, P and Vercruysse, J 2014. Chasing helminths and their economic impact on farmed ruminants. Trends in Parasitology 30, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, JCA, Mejita, ME, Martinez, EF and Cabaret, J 1989. El control de la gastroenteritis verminosa bovina en la ‘Pampa humeda’ (Argentina), bajo condiciones de campo, entre 1979 y 1987: Resultados, Limitantes y futuro del mismo. Tecnicrea 15, 3–17.Google Scholar
Demeler, J, Van Zeveren, AMJ, Kleinschmidt, N, Vercruysse, J, Höglund, J, Koopman, R, Cabaret, J, Claerebout, E, Areskog, M and von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G 2009. Monitoring the efficacy of ivermectin and albendazole against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in Northern Europe. Veterinary Parasitology 160, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysker, M and Ploeger, HW 2000. Value of present diagnostic methods for gastrointestinal nematode infections in ruminants. Parasitology 120, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahrenkrog, J 2013. Optimisation of Treatment Strategies to Control Parasitic Infections in Grazing Cattle. PhD thesis, Freie Universistät, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Geurden, T, Chartier, C, Fanke, J, di Regalbono, AF, Traversa, D, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G, Demeler, J, Vanimisetti, HB, Bartram, DJ and Denwood, MJ 2015. Anthelmintic resistance to ivermectin and moxidectin in gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in Europe. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance 5, 163–171.Google ScholarPubMed
Greer, AW, McAnulty, RW and Gibbs, SJ 2010. Performance-based targeted selective anthelmintic treatment regime for grazing dairy calves. In Proceeding of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium, 31 August–2 September, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 385–389.Google Scholar
Höglund, J, Morrison, DA, Charlier, J, Dimander, SO and Larsson, A 2009. Assessing the feasibility of targeted selective treatments for gastrointestinal nematodes in first-season grazing cattle based on mid-season daily weight gains. Veterinary Parasitology 164, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Höglund, J, Dahlström, F, Sollenberg, S and Hessle, A 2013. Weight gain-based targeted selective treatment (TST) of gastrointestinal nematodes in first-season grazing cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 196, 358–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenyon, F, Greer, AW, Coles, GC, Cringoli, G, Papadopoulos, E, Cabaret, J, Berrag, B, Varady, M, Van Wyk, JA, Thomas, E, Vercruysse, J and Jackson, F 2009. The role of targeted selective treatments in the development of refugia-based approaches to the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants. Veterinary Parasitology 164, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, F and Jackson, F 2012. Targeted flock/herd and an individual ruminant treatment approaches. Veterinary Parasitology 186, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerboeuf, D, Koch, C, Le Dréan, E and Lacourt, A 2002. Méthode simplifiée de mesure de la concentration en pepsinogène dans le sérum. Revue de Medécine Vétérinaire 153, 707–712.Google Scholar
McAnulty, RW, Gibbs, SJ and Greer, AW 2011. Brief communication: Liveweight gain of grazing dairy calves in their first grazing season subjected to a selective anthelmintic treatment (TST) regime. In Proceedings of the 71th New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Invercargill, New Zealand, pp. 301–303.Google Scholar
Merlin, A, Chauvin, A, Madouasse, A, Froger, S, Bareille, N and Chartier, C 2016. Explaining variability in first grazing season heifer growth combining individually measured parasitological and clinical indicators with exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infection based on grazing management practices. Veterinary Parasitology 225, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlin, A, Chauvin, A, Madouasse, A, Lehebel, A, Brisseau, N, Bareille, N and Chartier, C 2017. End-season daily weight gains as rationale for targeted selective treatment against gastrointestinal nematodes in highly exposed first-grazing season cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 138, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Shaughnessy, J, Earley, B, Mee, JF, Doherty, ML, Crosson, P, Barrett, D and de Waal, T 2015. Controlling nematodes in dairy calves using targeted selective treatments. Veterinary Parasitology 209, 221–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ploeger, HW, Borgsteede, FHM, Eysker, M and van den Brink, R 1990. Effect of nematode infections on growth performance of calves after stabling on commercial dairy farms. Veterinary Parasitology 36, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ploeger, HW, Borgsteede, FHM, Sol, J, Mirck, MH, Huyben, MWC, Kooyman, FNJ and Eysker, M 2000. Cross-sectional serological survey on gastrointestinal and lung nematode infections in first and second-year replacement stock in The Netherlands: relation with management practices use of anthelmintic. Veterinary Parasitology 90, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ploeger, HW and Kloosterman, A 1993. Gastrointestinal nematode infections and weight gain in dairy replacement stock: first-year calves. Veterinary Parasitology 46, 223–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ploeger, HW, Kloosterman, A, Rietveld, FW, Berghen, P, Hilderson, H and Hollanders, W 1994. Quantitative estimation of the level of exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infection in first-year calves. Veterinary Parasitology 55, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravinet, N, Bareille, N, Lehebel, A, Ponnau, A, Chartier, C and Chauvin, A 2014. Change in milk production after treatment against gastrointestinal nematodes according to grazing history, parasitological and production-based indicators in adult dairy cows. Veterinary Parasitology 201, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raynaud, JP, Bouchet, A, William, G, Leroy, JC, Naudin, B and Brunault, G 1976. Bovine ostertagiosis, a review. Analysis of types and syndromes found in France by post mortem examinations and total worm counts. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 7, 253–280.Google ScholarPubMed
R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. from http://www.Rproject.org/.Google Scholar
SAS Technical Report R-101 1978. Tests of hypotheses in fixed-effects linear models copyright ©. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shaw, DJ, Vercruysse, J, Claerebout, E, Agneessens, J and Dorny, P 1997. Gastrointestinal nematode infections of first-season grazing calves in Belgium: general patterns and the effect of chemoprophylaxis. Veterinary Parasitology 69, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, DJ, Vercruysse, J, Claerebout, E and Dorny, P 1998. Gastrointestinal nematode infections of first-grazing season calves in Western Europe: associations between parasitological, physiological and physical factors. Veterinary Parasitology 75, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wyk, JA, Hoste, H, Kaplan, RM and Besier, RB 2006. Targeted selective treatment for worm management-How do we sell rational programs for farmers? Veterinary Parasitology 139, 336–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed