Skip to main content


  • Access
  • Cited by 156
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Berton, Marco Cesaro, Giacomo Gallo, Luigi Ramanzin, Maurizio and Sturaro, Enrico 2018. Sources of variation of the environmental impact of cereal-based intensive beef finishing herds. Italian Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 767.

    Barré, Tangui Perignon, Marlène Gazan, Rozenn Vieux, Florent Micard, Valérie Amiot, Marie-Josèphe Darmon, Nicole and de Souza, Russell J. 2018. Integrating nutrient bioavailability and co-production links when identifying sustainable diets: How low should we reduce meat consumption?. PLOS ONE, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. e0191767.

    Lorenz, Klaus and Lal, Rattan 2018. Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Ecosystems. p. 175.

    Gourlez de la Motte, Louis Mamadou, Ossénatou Beckers, Yves Bodson, Bernard Heinesch, Bernard and Aubinet, Marc 2018. Rotational and continuous grazing does not affect the total net ecosystem exchange of a pasture grazed by cattle but modifies CO 2 exchange dynamics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 253, Issue. , p. 157.

    Khalil, Mohammad I. and Osborne, Bruce A. 2018. Improving estimates of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and their long-term temporal changes in agricultural soils in Ireland. Geoderma, Vol. 322, Issue. , p. 172.

    Sevov, Atanas Yancheva, Chtistina and Kazakova, Yanka 2018. New Perspectives in Forage Crops.

    da Rocha Junior, Paulo Roberto Andrade, Felipe Vaz Santos Satiro, Lucas Donagemma, Guilherme Kangussú and de Sá Mendonça, Eduardo 2018. Can short-term pasture management increase C balance in the Atlantic Rainforest?. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 190, Issue. 6,

    Börjesson, Gunnar Bolinder, Martin A. Kirchmann, Holger and Kätterer, Thomas 2018. Organic carbon stocks in topsoil and subsoil in long-term ley and cereal monoculture rotations. Biology and Fertility of Soils, Vol. 54, Issue. 4, p. 549.

    Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria DeLucia, Nicholas J. Bernacchi, Carl J. Boughton, Elizabeth H. Sparks, Jed P. Chamberlain, Samuel D. and DeLucia, Evan H. 2018. Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture. Ecological Applications, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 557.

    Rolinski, Susanne Müller, Christoph Heinke, Jens Weindl, Isabelle Biewald, Anne Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon Bondeau, Alberte Boons-Prins, Eltje R. Bouwman, Alexander F. Leffelaar, Peter A. te Roller, Johnny A. Schaphoff, Sibyll and Thonicke, Kirsten 2018. Modeling vegetation and carbon dynamics of managed grasslands at the global scale with LPJmL 3.6. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 429.

    Koncz, Péter Pintér, Krisztina Balogh, János Papp, Marianna Hidy, Dóra Csintalan, Zsolt Molnár, Erik Szaniszló, Albert Kampfl, Györgyi Horváth, László and Nagy, Zoltán 2017. Extensive grazing in contrast to mowing is climate-friendly based on the farm-scale greenhouse gas balance. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 240, Issue. , p. 121.

    Boval, Maryline Angeon, Valérie and Rudel, Tom 2017. Tropical grasslands: A pivotal place for a more multi-functional agriculture. Ambio, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 48.

    Assouma, Mohamed H. Serça, Dominique Guérin, Frédéric Blanfort, Vincent Lecomte, Philippe Touré, Ibra Ickowicz, Alexandre Manlay, Raphaël J. Bernoux, Martial and Vayssières, Jonathan 2017. Livestock induces strong spatial heterogeneity of soil CO2, N2O and CH4 emissions within a semi-arid sylvo-pastoral landscape in West Africa. Journal of Arid Land, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 210.

    Kirschbaum, Miko U.F. Schipper, Louis A. Mudge, Paul L. Rutledge, Susanna Puche, Nicolas J.B. and Campbell, David I. 2017. The trade-offs between milk production and soil organic carbon storage in dairy systems under different management and environmental factors. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 577, Issue. , p. 61.

    Conant, Richard T. Cerri, Carlos E. P. Osborne, Brooke B. and Paustian, Keith 2017. Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Ecological Applications, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 662.

    Flachowsky, Gerhard Meyer, Ulrich and Südekum, Karl-Heinz 2017. Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin—A Review. Animals, Vol. 7, Issue. 12, p. 25.

    García de Jalón, Silvestre Silvestri, Silvia and Barnes, Andrew P. 2017. The potential for adoption of climate smart agricultural practices in Sub-Saharan livestock systems. Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 399.

    Teillard, Félix Doyen, Luc Dross, Camille Jiguet, Frédéric and Tichit, Muriel 2017. Optimal allocations of agricultural intensity reveal win-no loss solutions for food production and biodiversity. Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 17, Issue. 5, p. 1397.

    Soussana, Jean-François Lutfalla, Suzanne Ehrhardt, Fiona Rosenstock, Todd Lamanna, Christine Havlík, Petr Richards, Meryl Wollenberg, Eva (Lini) Chotte, Jean-Luc Torquebiau, Emmanuel Ciais, Philippe Smith, Pete and Lal, Rattan 2017. Matching policy and science: Rationale for the ‘4 per 1000 - soils for food security and climate’ initiative. Soil and Tillage Research,

    Seo, S. Niggol 2017. The Behavioral Economics of Climate Change. p. 1.




      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands
        Available formats
        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands
        Available formats
        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands
        Available formats
Export citation


Soil carbon sequestration (enhanced sinks) is the mechanism responsible for most of the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential in the agriculture sector. Carbon sequestration in grasslands can be determined directly by measuring changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and indirectly by measuring the net balance of C fluxes. A literature search shows that grassland C sequestration reaches on average 5 ± 30 g C/m2 per year according to inventories of SOC stocks and −231 and 77 g C/m2 per year for drained organic and mineral soils, respectively, according to C flux balance. Off-site C sequestration occurs whenever more manure C is produced by than returned to a grassland plot. The sum of on- and off-site C sequestration reaches 129, 98 and 71 g C/m2 per year for grazed, cut and mixed European grasslands on mineral soils, respectively, however with high uncertainty. A range of management practices reduce C losses and increase C sequestration: (i) avoiding soil tillage and the conversion of grasslands to arable use, (ii) moderately intensifying nutrient-poor permanent grasslands, (iii) using light grazing instead of heavy grazing, (iv) increasing the duration of grass leys; (v) converting grass leys to grass-legume mixtures or to permanent grasslands. With nine European sites, direct emissions of N2O from soil and of CH4 from enteric fermentation at grazing, expressed in CO2 equivalents, compensated 10% and 34% of the on-site grassland C sequestration, respectively. Digestion inside the barn of the harvested herbage leads to further emissions of CH4 and N2O by the production systems, which were estimated at 130 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year. The net balance of on- and off-site C sequestration, CH4 and N2O emissions reached 38 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year, indicating a non-significant net sink activity. This net balance was, however, negative for intensively managed cut sites indicating a source to the atmosphere. In conclusion, this review confirms that grassland C sequestration has a strong potential to partly mitigate the GHG balance of ruminant production systems. However, as soil C sequestration is both reversible and vulnerable to disturbance, biodiversity loss and climate change, CH4 and N2O emissions from the livestock sector need to be reduced and current SOC stocks preserved.


The C sequestration potential by grasslands and rangelands could be used to partly mitigate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the livestock sector. This will require avoiding land use changes that reduce ecosystem soil C stocks (e.g. deforestation, ploughing up long-term grasslands) and a cautious management of pastures, aiming at preserving and restoring soils and their soil organic matter content. Combined with other mitigation measures, such as a reduction in the use of N fertilisers, of fossil-fuel energy and of N-rich feedstuffs by farms, this may lead to substantial reductions in GHG emissions per unit land area and per unit animal product.


Grasslands cover about one-quarter of the earth’s land surface (Ojima et al., 1993) and span a range of climate conditions from arid to humid. Grasslands are the natural climax vegetation in areas (e.g. the Steppes of central Asia and the prairies of North America) where the rainfall is low enough to prevent the growth of forests. In other areas, where rainfall is normally higher, grasslands do not form the climax vegetation (e.g. north-western and central Europe) and are more productive. Rangelands are characterised by low-stature vegetation, owing to temperature and moisture restrictions, and found on every continent. Grasslands contribute to the livelihoods of over 800 million people, including many poor smallholders (Reynolds et al., 2005) and provide a variety of goods and services to support flora, fauna, and human populations worldwide. On a global scale, livestock use 3.4 billion hectares of grazing land (i.e. grasslands and rangelands), in addition to animal feed produced on about a quarter of the land under crops. By 2020, this agricultural sub-sector will produce about 30% of the value of global agricultural output (Delgado, 2005).

Agriculture accounted for an estimated emission of 5.1 to 6.1 Gigaton (Gt) CO2 equivalents per year in 2005 (10% to 12% of total global anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007) and for ca. 60% of N2O emissions and 50% of CH4 emissions). Between 1990 and 2005, the direct emissions of the agriculture sector have increased by 17% and this increase has mostly occurred in developing countries (IPCC, 2007). The GHG inventory methodology used by IPCC (IPCC, 1996 and 2006) only includes, however, farm emissions in the agriculture sector. Indirect GHG emissions generated by farm activity through the use of farm inputs (e.g. fertilisers, feed, pesticides) do not belong to the agriculture sector, but are covered by other sectors such as industry (e.g. for the synthesis and packaging of inorganic N fertilisers and of organic pesticides) and transport (e.g. transport of fertilisers and feed). Emissions from electricity and fuel use are covered in the buildings and transport sector, respectively (IPCC, 2006).

Although the sectoral approach used by IPCC is appropriate for national and regional GHG inventories, it does not reflect emissions generated directly or indirectly by marketed products. Lifecycle analyses include indirect emissions generated by farm inputs and pre-chain activities. With this approach, it was estimated that livestock production systems, from feeding import to marketed animal products, generate directly and indirectly 18% of global GHG emissions as measured in CO2 equivalents (Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 2006). Livestock production induces 9% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions. The largest share (i.e. 7%) of this derives from land-use changes – especially deforestation – caused by expansion of pastures and arable land for feed crops. Livestock production systems also emit 37% of anthropogenic methane (see Martin et al., 2009) most of that from enteric fermentation by ruminants. Furthermore, it induces 65% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide emissions, the great majority from manure (FAO, 2006).

Agricultural ecosystems hold large C reserves (IPCC, 2001), mostly in soil organic matter. Historically, these systems have lost more than 50 Gt C (Paustian et al., 1998; Lal, 1999 and 2004). Agricultural lands generate very large CO2 fluxes, both to and from the atmosphere (IPCC, 2001), but the net flux would be small (United States-Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), 2006). Nevertheless, soil C sequestration (enhanced sinks) is the mechanism responsible for most of the mitigation potential in the agriculture sector, with an estimated 89% contribution to the technical potential (IPCC, 2007), excluding, however, the potential for fossil energy substitution through non-agricultural use of biomass. Worldwide the soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration potential is estimated to be 0.01 to 0.3 Gt C/year on 3.7 billion ha of permanent pasture (Lal, 2004). Thus SOC sequestration by the world’s permanent pastures could potentially offset up to 4% of the global GHG emissions.

Here, we review the C sequestration potential of temperate managed grasslands, focusing on Europe, and its role for mitigating the GHG balance of livestock production systems. We address the following issues: (i) carbon and GHG balance of managed grasslands, (ii) vulnerability of grassland C stocks to climate change and to biodiversity loss and (iii) the role of C sequestration for the GHG balance of ruminant production systems.

The carbon balance of managed grasslands

Organic carbon cycling in grasslands

The nature, frequency and intensity of disturbance play a key role in the C balance of grasslands. In a cutting regime, a large part of the primary production is exported from the plot as hay or silage, but part of these C exports may be compensated for by organic C imports through farm manure and slurry application.

Under intensive grazing, up to 60% of the above-ground dry-matter production is ingested by domestic herbivores (Lemaire and Chapman, 1996). However, this percentage can be much lower under extensive grazing. The largest part of the ingested C is digestible and, hence, is respired shortly after intake. The non-digestible C (25% to 40% of the intake according to the digestibility of the grazed herbage) is returned to the pasture in excreta (mainly as faeces). In most productive husbandry systems, the herbage digestibility tends to be maximised by agricultural practices such as frequent grazing and use of highly digestible forage cultivars. Consequently, in these systems the primary factor which modifies the C flux returned to the soil by excreta is the grazing pressure, which varies with the annual stocking rate (mean number of livestock units per unit area) (Soussana et al., 2004). Secondary effects of grazing on the C cycle of a pasture include: (i) the role of excretal returns which, at a moderate rate of grazing intensity, could favour nutrient cycling and increase primary production, especially in nutrient-poor grasslands (De Mazancourt et al., 1998); (ii) the role of defoliation intensity and frequency, and of treading by animals, which both reduce the leaf area and then the atmospheric CO2 capture.

Only a small fraction of the ingested grassland C is accumulated by ruminants in meat production systems (e.g. 0.6% of C intake with heifers under continuous upland grazing; Allard et al., 2007), but this fraction becomes much higher in intensive dairy production systems (e.g. 19% to 20% of C intake; Faverdin et al., 2007). Additional C losses (ca. 3% to 5% of the digestible C) occur through methane emissions from the enteric fermentation (IPCC, 2006; see Martin et al., 2009).

Processes controlling soil organic carbon accumulation

Carbon accumulation in grassland ecosystems occurs mostly below ground. Grassland soils are typically rich in SOC, partly owing to active rhizodeposition (Jones and Donnelly, 2004) and partly to the activity of earthworms that promote macro-aggregate formation in which micro-aggregates form that stabilise SOC for extended periods (Six et al., 2002; Bossuyt et al., 2005). Rhizodeposition favours C storage (Balesdent and Balabane, 1996), because direct incorporation into the soil matrix allows a high degree of physical stabilisation of the soil organic matter. Root litter transformation is also an important determinant of the C cycle in grassland ecosystems, which is affected both by the root litter quality and by the rhizosphere activity (Personeni and Loiseau, 2004 and 2005).

Below-ground C generally has slower turnover rates than above-ground C, as most of the organic C in soils (humic substances) is produced by the transformation of plant litter into more persistent organic compounds (Jones and Donnelly, 2004). Coarse soil organic matter fractions (above 0.2 mm) have a fast turnover in soils, and the mean residence time of C in these fractions is reduced by intensive compared to extensive management (Klumpp et al., 2007). SOC may persist because it is bound to soil minerals and exists in forms that microbial decomposers cannot access (Baldock and Skjemstad, 2000). Therefore, SOC accumulation is often increased in clayey compared to sandy soils.

Sequestred SOC can, if undisturbed, remain in the soil for centuries. In native prairie sites in the US great plains, where SOC was 14C-dated (Follett et al., 2004), mean residence time of SOC in the soil increased but its concentration decreased with depth. Nevertheless, substantial amounts of SOC remained at depth even after several millennia. In an upland grassland in France, the mean residence time of SOC also increased with depth, reaching values of 2000 to 10 000 years in deep soil layer (>0.2 m) (Fontaine et al., 2007). The lack of energy supply from fresh organic matter protects ancient buried organic C from microbial decomposition (Fontaine et al., 2007). Therefore, agricultural practices like ploughing, which mix soil layers and break soil aggregates, accelerate SOC decomposition (Paustian et al., 1998, Conant et al., 2007).

While there has been a steady C accumulation in the soils of many ecosystems over millennia (Schlesinger, 1990), it is usually thought that soil C accumulation capacity is limited and that old non-disturbed soils should have reached after several centuries equilibrium in terms of their C balance (Lal, 2004). Soil C sequestration is reversible, as factors like soil disturbance, vegetation degradation, fire, erosion, nutrients shortage and water deficit may all lead to a rapid loss of SOC.

Role of land use change for carbon sequestration

Carbon sequestration can be determined directly by measuring changes in C pools (Conant et al., 2001) and, or, indirectly by measuring C fluxes (Table 1 and equation (1)). SOC stocks display a high spatial variability (coefficient of variation of 50%; Cannell et al., 1999) in grassland as compared to arable land, which limits the accuracy of direct determinations of C stock changes. The variability in SOC contents is increased by sampling to different depths (Robles and Burke, 1998; Chevallier et al., 2000; Bird et al., 2002) and in pastures by excretal returns concentrated in patches.

Changes in SOC through time are non-linear after a change in land use or in grassland management. A simple two parameters exponential model has been used to estimate the magnitude of the soil C stock changes (Soussana et al., 2004), showing that C is lost more rapidly than it is gained after a change in land use. Land use change from grassland to cropland systems causes losses of SOC in temperate regions ranging from 18% (±4) in dry climates to 29% (±4) in moist climates. Converting cropland back to grassland uses for 20 years was found to restore 18% (±7) of the native C stocks in moist climates (relative to the 29% loss owing to long-term cultivation) and 7% (±5) of native stocks in temperate dry climates (Conant et al., 2001). As a result of periodic tillage and resowing, short-duration grasslands tend to have a potential for soil C storage intermediate between crops and permanent grassland. Part of the additional C stored in the soil during the grassland phase is released when the grassland is ploughed up. The mean C storage increases in line with prolonging the lifespan of covers, that is, less frequent ploughing (Soussana et al., 2004).

Role of management for carbon sequestration in grasslands

A number of studies have analysed effects of grassland and rangeland management on SOC stocks (Table 1). Most studies concern only the top-soil (e.g. 0 to 30 cm), although C sequestration or loss may also occur in deeper soil layers (Fontaine et al., 2007). It is often assumed that impacts of management are greatest at the surface and decline with depth in the profile (Ogle et al., 2004). A meta-analysis of 115 studies in pastures and other grazing lands worldwide (Conant et al., 2001), indicated that soil C levels increased with improved management (primarily fertilisation, grazing management, and conversion from cultivation or native vegetation, improved grass species) in 74% of the studies considered (Table 1). Light grazing increased SOC stocks compared to exclosure and to heavy grazing (Ganjegunte et al., 2005; Table 1). Some of the possible soil C sequestration opportunities for temperate grasslands in France have been calculated and compared (Table 1) for 20-year time periods (Soussana et al., 2004). According to these estimates, annual C storage rates between 20 and 50 g C/m2 per year are obtained for a range of options, which seem compatible with gradual changes in the forage production systems, namely: (i) reducing N fertiliser inputs in highly intensive grass leys; (ii) increasing the duration of grass leys; (iii) converting these leys to grass-legume mixtures or to permanent grasslands; (iv) moderately intensifying nutrient-poor permanent grasslands. By contrast, the intensification of nutrient-poor grasslands developed on organic soils may lead to large C losses, and the conversion of permanent grasslands to leys of medium duration is also conducive to the release of soil C. Nevertheless, the uncertainties concerning the estimated values of C storage or release after a change in grassland management are still very high (estimated at 25 g C/m2 per year).

Data from the National Soil Inventory of England and Wales obtained between 1978 and 2003 (Bellamy et al., 2005) show that C was lost from most top soils across England and Wales over the survey period. Nevertheless, rotational grasslands gained C at a rate of ca. 10 g C/m2 per year (Table 1). The Countryside Surveys of Great Britain are ongoing ecological assessments in UK that have taken place since 1978 (Firbank et al., 2003). In this survey, significant increases in soil C concentration, ranging from 0.2 to 2.1 g/kg per year, were observed in both fertile and infertile grasslands (CLIMSOIL, 2008).

In Belgium, grasslands were reported either to be sequestering C in soils at rates of 22 or 44 g C/m2 per year (Lettens et al., 2005a; Goidts and van Wesemael, 2007, respectively), or losing C at 90 g C/m2 per year on podzolic, clayey and loam soils (Lettens et al., 2005b). However, soil bulk density was estimated from pedo-transfer functions in these studies, which adds to the uncertainty, as a small change in bulk density can result in a large change in stock of SOC (Smith et al., 2007).

Follett and Schuman (2005) reviewed grazing land contributions to C sequestration worldwide using 19 regions. A positive relationship was found, on average, between the C sequestration rate and the animal stocking density, which is an indicator of the pasture primary productivity. Based on this relationship, they estimate a 200 Megatons SOC sequestration per year on 3.5 billion ha of permanent pasture worldwide. Using national grassland resource dataset and NDVI (Normalised Difference Vegetation Index) time series data, Piao et al. (2009) estimated that C stocks of China’s grasslands increased over the past two decades by 117 and 101 g C/m2 per year in the vegetation and soil compartments, respectively.

In their assessment of the European C balance, Janssens et al. (2003) concluded that grasslands were a highly uncertain component of the European-wide C balance in comparison to forests and croplands. They estimated a net grassland C sink of 66 ± 90 g C/m2 per year over geographic Europe, though this estimate was not based on field data but on a simple model using yields and land-use data (Vleeshouwers and Verhagen, 2002).

The 2006 IPCC Guidelines allow for the estimation of: (i) C emissions and removals in grasslands owing to changes in stocks in above and below-ground biomass; (ii) emissions of non-CO2 GHGs (CO, CH4, N2O and NOx) owing to biomass burning (Fearnside, 2000); and (iii) C emissions and removals in grasslands owing to changes in soil C stocks. Mineral and organic soils (peat, histosoils, etc.) are separated for the calculations of soil C stock changes, provided that national inventory data are available for grassland soils (IPCC, 2006). Ogle et al. (2004) identified 49 studies dealing with effects of management practices that either degraded or improved conditions relative to nominally managed grasslands. On average, degradation reduced SOC stocks to 95% and 97% of C stored under nominal conditions in temperate and tropical regions, respectively. In contrast, improving grasslands with a single management activity enhanced SOC stocks by 14% and 17% in temperate and tropical regions, respectively, and with an additional improvement(s), stocks increased by another 11%. By applying these factors to managed grasslands in the USA, Ogle et al. (2004) found that over a 20-year period, changing management could sequester up to 142 Megatons C per year.

Estimating carbon sequestration from carbon flux measurements

An alternative to the direct measurement of C stock changes in grasslands is to measure the net balance of C fluxes (net C storage, NCS) exchanged at the system boundaries. This approach provides a high temporal resolution and changes in C stock can be detected within one year. In contrast, direct measurements of stock change require several years or several decades to detect significant effects, given the high variability among samples. The main drawback of flux measurements, however, is that several C fluxes need to be measured: (i) trace gases exchanged with the atmosphere (i.e. CO2; CH4; volatile organic compounds, VOC; and emissions during fires), (ii) organic C imports (manures) and exports (harvests, animal products), (iii) dissolved C lost in waters (dissolved organic and inorganic C) and lateral transport of soil C through erosion (Figure 1). NCS (g C/m2 per year) is the mass balance of these fluxes (equation (1)):


where is equal to the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 between the ecosystem and the atmosphere, which is conventionally positive for a C gain by the ecosystem. , FVOC and Ffire are trace gas C losses from the ecosystem (g C/m2 per year). Fmanure, Fharvest and Fanimal-products are lateral organic C fluxes (g C/m2 per year), which are either imported or exported from the system. Fleach and Ferosion are organic (and/or inorganic C losses in g C/m2 per year) through leaching and erosion, respectively.

Figure 1 Carbon fluxes (g C/m2 per year) in a managed grassland. is the net CO2 ecosystem exchange. Ffire is the total C loss by fire; , FVOC are non-CO2 trace gas C losses from the ecosystem, as methane and volatile organic carbon, respectively. Fmanure, Fharvest and Fanimal-products are lateral organic C fluxes, which are either imported (manure application) or exported (harvests and animal products) from the system. Fleach and Ferosion are organic (and/or inorganic) C losses through leaching and erosion, respectively. Net carbon storage (NCS, see equation (1)) is calculated as the balance of carbon fluxes.

Nevertheless, depending on the system studied and its management, some of these fluxes can be neglected for NCS calculation. For instance, fire emissions by grasslands are very low in temperate regions like Europe (i.e. below 1 g C/m2 per year over 1997 to 2004), while they reach 10 and 100 g C/m2 per year in the Mediterranean and in tropical grasslands, respectively (Van der Werf et al., 2006). Erosion (Ferosion) is also rather insignificant in permanent grasslands (e.g. in Europe), but can be increased by tillage in the case of sown grasslands. The global map of Ferosion created by Van Oost et al. (2007) indicates that grassland C erosion rates are usually below 5 g C/m2 per year, even in tropical dry grasslands (Van Oost et al., 2007). The total dissolved C loss by leaching was estimated by Siemens (2003) and Janssens et al. (2003) at 11 ± 8 g C/m2 per year for Europe. This flux tends to be highly variable depending on soil (pH, carbonate) and climate (rainfall, temperature) factors, and it could reach higher values in wet tropical grasslands, especially on calcareous substrate. VOC emissions by grassland systems are increased in the short-term by cutting and tend to be higher with legumes than with grass species (Davison et al., 2008). However, these C fluxes are usually small and can easily be neglected. Therefore, with temperate managed grasslands, equation (1) can be simplified as (Allard et al., 2007):


With the advancement of micrometeorological studies of the ecosystem-scale exchange of CO2 (Baldocchi and Meyers, 1998), eddy flux covariance measurement techniques have been applied to grassland and rangelands. As the measurement uses a free-air technique, as opposed to enclosures, there is no disturbance of the measured area that can be freely accessed by herbivores. Ruminant’s belched CO2 (digestive + metabolic CO2) at grazing, which can be measured by the SF6 method (Pinares-Patino et al., 2007), is included in measurements. It has no direct effect on the atmospheric CO2 concentration, because it is ‘short-cycling’ carbon, which has been fixed by plants earlier.

Gilmanov et al. (2007) have analysed tower CO2 flux measurements from 20 European grasslands, covering a wide range of environmental and management conditions. varies from significant net uptake (650 g C/m2 per year) to significant release (160 g C/m2 per year). Four sites became CO2 sources in some years, two of them during drought events and two of them with a significant peat horizon (Gilmanov et al., 2007). Therefore, net CO2 release ( < 0) is associated with organic-rich soils and heat stress. Indeed, a net CO2 release was found with drained organic soils subjected to grazing in Switzerland and in New Zealand (Nieveen et al., 2005; Rogiers et al., 2008), and these sites were found to lose C (i.e. negative NCS; Table 1).

Within the European (FP5 EESD) ‘GreenGrass’ project, the full GHG balance of nine contrasted grassland sites covering a major climatic gradient over Europe (Tables 1 and 2), was measured during two complete years (Soussana et al., 2007). The sites include a wide range of management regimes (rotational grazing, continuous grazing and mowing), the three main types of managed grasslands across Europe (sown, intensive permanent and semi-natural grassland) and contrasted nitrogen fertiliser supplies. Two sites (in Ireland and in Switzerland; Table 1) were sown grass-legume mixtures, while the remainder were long-term grasslands. At all sites, the NEE of CO2 was assessed using the eddy covariance technique. CH4 emissions resulting from enteric fermentation of the grazing cattle were measured in situ at four sites using the SF6 tracer method. N2O emissions were monitored using various techniques (GC-cuvette systems, automated chambers and tunable diode laser).

Table 1 Literature survey of net C storage (NCS) at grassland sites using different methods: C flux balance (A), grassland soil C inventory (B), soil C change after a change in grassland management (C), and farm scale flux measurements (D). A positive represents a net C uptake from the ecosystem. A positive NCS denotes a net carbon accumulation in grassland ecosystems. All fluxes are in g C/m2 per year

MAT = mean annual temperature; MAP = mean annual precipitation; = net CO2 ecosystem exchange; Fmanure = lateral organic C fluxes which are imported (manure application) in the system; Fharvest = lateral organic C fluxes which are exported (harvests) from the system; n.d. = not defined.

a average of growing season.

b 87% of the studies were from Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, Brazil and the United States.

**Not included in mean.

Additional studies can be found in the reviews by Conant et al. (2001) and by Ogle et al. (2004).

Table 2 Mean annual greenhouse fluxes in CO2 equivalents/m2 per year of managed European grassland sites studied by Soussana et al. (2007)

NCS = net carbon storage in the grassland (see equation (2)); Att-NCS = attributed net carbon storage (see equation (4)); NGHG = net greenhouse gas balance (see equation (3)); Att-NGHG = attributed net greenhouse gas balance (see equation (5)); GWP = global warming potential.

Data are means of two, four and three European sites for grazed only (meat production systems), cut and grazed (meat and dairy production systems), and cut only (dairy production systems) grasslands.

A positive value of NCS, Att-NCS, NGHG and Att-NGHG denotes a sink activity of the grassland ecosystems.

The average C storage was initially estimated at 104 ± 73 g C/m2 per year, but without accounting for C leaching and for C exports in animal products (Soussana et al., 2007). NCS and component fluxes are shown in Figure 2. Results, corrected for animal exports (Fanimal-products) and for C leaching (Fleach), show that NCS varied between 50 and 129 g C/m2 per year and was higher in grazed than in cut grasslands (Figure 2). Across sites, NCS declined with the degree of herbage utilisation by herbivores through grazing and cutting (Soussana et al., 2007), which underlines that grassland C sequestration per unit area is favoured by extensive management provided that nutrients are not limiting (Allard et al., 2007; Klumpp et al., 2007). The uncertainty associated to NCS can be estimated using Gaussian error propagation rules and accounting for site number in each management type. NCS uncertainty reached 25% and 80% of the mean (data not shown) for grazed and for cut and mixed systems, respectively. Indeed, Ammann et al. (2007) reported that cutting and manure application introduce further uncertainties in NCS estimates.

Figure 2 Carbon fluxes (g C/m2 per year) in managed European grassland systems studied by Soussana et al. (2007). Net carbon storage in the grassland (NCS, see equation (2)) in (a) grazed only, (b) cut and grazed and (c) cut only grasslands is calculated as the balance of carbon fluxes. For abbreviations, see Figure 1. Data are means of two, four and three European sites for grazed only ((a), meat production systems), cut and grazed ((b), meat and dairy production systems) and cut only ((a), dairy production systems) grasslands. A standard Fleach value (10 g C/m2 per year) was assumed for all sites. C exports in animal products were assumed to reach 2% and 20% of C intake for meat and milk production, respectively (see text). Grazed sites: Hungary, France, Italy (see Allard et al., 2007; Soussana et al., 2007; Table 1). Cut and grazed sites: Scotland, Ireland and the Netherlands (see Soussana et al., 2007; Table 1). Cut sites: Switzerland (see Ammann et al., 2007; Table 1). A positive value of NCS and attributed NCS denotes a sink activity of the grassland ecosystem.

A literature search shows that grassland C sequestration reaches on average 5 ± 30 g C/m2 per year according to inventories of SOC stocks and 22 ± 56 g C/m2 per year according to C flux balance (Table 1). These two estimates are therefore not significantly different, although there has not yet been any direct comparison at the same site between C flux and C stock change measurements. According to both flux (−231 and 77 g C/m2 per year, respectively, Table 1A) and inventory (Bellamy et al., 2005) methods, organic soils would be more susceptible of losing carbon than mineral soils, which underlines the need to preserve high soil C stocks.

Carbon flux studies show that NCS is affected by a number of site-specific factors, including grassland type (newly established v. permanent, Byrne et al., 2005), N fertiliser supply (Ammann et al., 2007), grazing pressure (Allard et al., 2007), drainage (Nieveen et al., 2005; Rogiers et al., 2008) and burning (Suyker and Verma, 2001) (Table 1). In addition, annual rainfall, temperature and radiation (Hunt et al., 2004; Ciais et al., 2005; Gilmanov et al., 2007; Soussana et al., 2007) play an important role for the variability in NCS between years and between sites. Other possibly overlooked factors in C flux studies include past changes in land use (e.g. from arable to grassland) and grassland management (e.g. increased fertilisation, reduced herbage utilisation by grazing and cutting), which have carry-over effects on soil C pools. In addition, the recent rise in air temperature, in atmospheric CO2 concentration and in N deposition has enhanced plant growth in northern mid-latitudes and high latitudes (Nemani et al., 2003). Global change would therefore force grassland soils out of equilibrium, possibly leading to a transient increase in SOC stocks in temperate regions as a result of increased net primary productivity. Further research is needed to disentangle such global factors from management factors, in order to attribute grassland C sequestration to direct anthropogenic changes (land use and land management) and/or to climatic and atmospheric changes.

The greenhouse gas balance of managed grasslands

When assessing the impact of land use and land-use change on GHG emissions, it is important to consider the impacts on all GHGs (Robertson et al., 2000). N2O and CH4 emissions are often expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents, which is possible because the radiative forcing of nitrous oxide, methane and carbon dioxide, can be integrated over different timescales and compared to that for CO2. For example, over the 100-year timescale, on a kilogram-for-kilogram basis, one unit of nitrous oxide has the same global warming potential (GWP) as 298 units of carbon dioxide ( = 298), whereas one unit of methane has the same GWP as 25 units of carbon dioxide ( = 25) (IPCC, 2007). An integrated approach is needed to quantify in CO2 equivalents the fluxes of all the three trace gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O).

Management choices to reduce emissions involve important trade-offs: for example, preserving grasslands and adapting their management to improve C sequestration in the soil may actually increase N2O and CH4 emissions at farm scale. As agricultural management is one of the key drivers of the sequestration and emission processes, for grasslands there is potential to reduce the net GHG flux, expressed in CO2 equivalents. Methane emissions by enteric fermentation under grazing conditions are reviewed in details by Martin et al. (2009). Below, we focus on N2O emissions and on the GHG balance in CO2 equivalents.

Nitrous oxide emissions from grassland soils

Biogenic emissions of N2O from soils result primarily from the microbial processes nitrification and denitrification. N2O is a by-product of nitrification and an intermediate during denitrification. Nitrification is the aerobic microbial oxidation of ammonium to nitrate and denitrification is the anaerobic microbial reduction of nitrate through nitrite, nitric oxide (NO) and N2O to N2. Nitrous oxide is a gaseous product that may be released from both processes to the soil atmosphere.

Major environmental regulators of these processes are temperature, pH, soil moisture (i.e. oxygen availability) and C availability (Velthof and Oenema, 1997). In most agricultural soils, biogenic formation of N2O is enhanced by an increase in available mineral nitrogen, which in turn increases nitrification and denitrification rates. Hence, in general, addition of fertiliser N or manures and wastes containing inorganic or readily mineralisable N, will stimulate N2O emission, as modified by soil conditions at the time of application. N2O losses under anaerobic conditions are usually considered more important than nitrification-N2O losses under aerobic conditions (Skiba and Smith, 2000).

For given soil and climate conditions, N2O emissions are likely to scale with the nitrogen fertiliser inputs. Therefore, the current IPCC (2006) methodology assumes a default emission factor (EF1) of 1% (ranging from 0.3% to 3%) for non-tropical soils emitted as N2O per unit nitrogen input N (0.003 to 0.03 kg N2O-N/kg N input).

N2O emissions in soils usually occur in ‘hot spots’ associated with urine spots and particles of residues and fertiliser, despite the diffused spreading of fertilisers and manure (Flechard et al., 2007). Nitrous oxide emissions from grasslands also tend to occur in short-lived bursts following the application of fertilisers (Clayton et al., 1997; Leahy et al., 2004). Temporal and spatial variations contribute large sources of uncertainty in N2O fluxes at the field and annual scales (Flechard et al., 2005). The overall uncertainty in annual flux estimates derived from chamber measurements may be as high as 50% owing to the temporal and spatial variability in fluxes, which warrants the future use of continuous measurements, if possible at the field scale (Flechard et al., 2007). In the same study, annual emission factors for fertilised systems were highly variable, but the mean emission factor (0.75%) was substantially lower than the IPCC default value of 1.0% for direct emissions of N2O from N fertilisers (Flechard et al., 2007).

The relationship, on a global basis, between the amount of N fixed by chemical, biological or atmospheric processes entering the terrestrial biosphere, and the total emission of N2O shows an overall conversion factor of 3% to 5% (Crutzen et al., 2007). This factor is covered only in part by the 1% of direct emissions factor. Additional indirect emissions, resulting from further N2O emissions at the landscape scale, are also accounted for by IPCC (2006).

Methane exchanged with grassland soils

In soils, methane is formed under anaerobic conditions at the end of the reduction chain when all other electron acceptors such as, for example, nitrate and sulphate, have been used. Methane emissions from freely drained grassland soils are, therefore, negligible. In fact, aerobic grassland soils tend to oxidise methane at a larger rate than cropland soil (6 and 3 kg CH4/ha per year respectively), but less so than uncultivated soils (Boeckx and Van Cleemput, 2001). In contrast, in wet grasslands as in wetlands, the development of anaerobic conditions in soils may lead to methane emissions. In an abandoned peat meadow, methane emissions were lower in water-unsaturated compared to water-saturated soil conditions (Hendriks et al., 2007). Keppler et al. (2006) have shown the emissions of low amounts of CH4 by terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. However, this claim has not been confirmed since and was shown to be caused by an experimental artefact (Dueck et al., 2007).

Budgeting the greenhouse gas balance of grasslands

Budgeting equations can be extended to include fluxes ( and ) of non-CO2 radiatively active trace gases and calculate a net exchange rate in CO2 equivalents (net greenhouse gas balance, NGHG; g CO2/m2 per year, equation (3)), using the GWP of each gas at the 100-years time horizon (IPCC, 2007):


where = 44/12 g CO2-g C, is the methane emission (g CH4/m2 per year) and is the nitrous oxide emission (g N2O/m2 per year). CH4 is not double counted as CO2 in equation (4), as is added to NCS.

On average, of the nine sites covered by the ‘GreenGrass’ European project, the grassland plots displayed annual N2O and CH4 emissions of 39 and 101 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year, respectively (Table 2). Hence, when expressed in CO2 equivalents, emissions of N2O and CH4 compensated 10% and 34% of the on-site grassland C sequestration, respectively. The mean on-site NGHG reached 198 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year, indicating a sink for the atmosphere. Nevertheless, sites that were intensively managed by grazing and cutting had a negative NGHG and were therefore estimated to be GHG sources in CO2 equivalents.

Vulnerability of soil organic carbon to climate change

Although the ancient carbon located in the deep soil is presumably protected from microbial decomposition by a lack of easily degradable substrates (Fontaine et al., 2003), soil C stocks in grassland ecosystems are vulnerable to climate change. The 2003 heat wave and drought reduced by 30% the total gross primary productivity over Europe, which resulted in a strong anomalous net source of carbon dioxide (0.5 Gt C per year) to the atmosphere and reversed the effect of 4 years of net ecosystem C sequestration (Ciais et al., 2005). An increase in future drought events could therefore turn temperate grasslands into C sources, contributing to positive carbon-climate feedbacks already anticipated in the tropics and at high latitudes (Betts et al., 2004; Ciais et al., 2005; Bony et al., 2006). Gilmanov et al. (2005) have also shown that a source type of activity is not an exception for the mixed prairie ecosystems in North America, especially during years with lower than normal precipitation.

The atmospheric conditions that result in such heat-wave conditions are likely to increase in frequency (Meehl and Tebaldi, 2004) and may approach the norm by 2080 under scenarios with high GHG emissions (Beniston, 2004; Schär and Jendritzky, 2004). The rise in atmospheric CO2 reduces the sensitivity of grassland ecosystems to drought (Morgan et al., 2004) and increases grassland productivity by 5% to 15% depending on water and nutrients availability (Soussana and Hartwig, 1996; Soussana et al., 1996; Tubiello et al., 2007). However, these positive effects are unlikely to offset the negative impacts of high temperature changes and reduced summer rainfall, which would lead to more frequent and more intense droughts (Lehner et al., 2006) and, presumably, C loss from soils.

The possible implication of climate change was studied by Smith et al. (2005) who calculated soil C change using the Rothamsted carbon model and using climate data from four global climate models implementing four IPCC emission scenarios. Changes in net primary production (NPP) were calculated by the Lund–Potsdam–Jena model. Land-use change scenarios were used to project changes in cropland and grassland areas. Projections for 1990 to 2080 for mineral soil show that climate effects (soil temperature and moisture) will tend to speed decomposition and cause soil C stocks to decrease, whereas increases in C input because of increasing NPP could slow the loss.

According to empirical niche-based models, projected changes in temperature and precipitation are likely to lead to large shifts in the distribution of plant species, with negative effects on biodiversity at regional and global scales (Thomas et al., 2004; Thuiller et al., 2005). Although such model predictions are highly uncertain, experiments do support the concept of fast changes in plant species composition and diversity under elevated CO2, with complex interactions with warming and changes in rainfall (Teyssonneyre et al., 2002; Picon-Cochard et al., 2004). Indeed, warming and altered precipitation have been shown to affect plant community structure and species diversity in rainfall manipulation experiments (Zavaleta et al., 2003; Klein et al., 2005).

Biodiversity experiments have shown causal relationships between species number or functional diversity, ecosystem productivity (e.g. Tilman et al., 1997; Hector et al., 1999; Röscher et al., 2005) and C sequestration (Tilman et al., 2006a and 2006b, Klumpp and Soussana, 2009). Therefore, another threat to C sequestration by grassland soils stems from the rapid loss of plant diversity, which is projected under climate change.

The role of grassland carbon sequestration for the GHG balance of livestock systems

There are still substantial uncertainties in most components of the GHG balance of livestock production systems. Methods developed for national and global GHG inventories are inaccurate at the farm scale. Livestock production systems can be ranked differently depending on the approach (plot scale, on farm budget, lifecycle analysis) and on the criteria (emissions per unit land area or per unit animal product) selected (Schils et al., 2007). Moreover, C sequestration (or loss) plays an important (Table 1D), but often neglected, role in the farm GHG budget.

Carbon transfer between different fields is very common in livestock production systems. The application of organic manure to certain fields may also strongly vary from year to year (depending for example on the nutrient status). To date, grassland C sequestration has mostly been studied at the field scale, neglecting the post-harvest fate of the cut herbage. The calculation of NCS considers that the total carbon in the harvested herbage returns within one year to the atmosphere. This is usually not the case, as the non-digestible carbon in this pool will be excreted by ruminants and incorporated into manure that will be spread after storage either on the same or on another field. Off-site C sequestration will occur whenever more C manure is produced by than that returned to a grassland plot. To make some progress, we estimate below the off-site C and GHG balance of the harvested herbage.

Carbon balance during housing

When considering an off-site balance, the system boundaries need to be defined. In the barn, ruminant’s digestion of the harvested herbage (Fharvest) leads to additional C losses as respiratory CO2 and methane from enteric fermentation and to the production of animal effluents (manure). The manure generated by harvests from a given grassland field will be brought to other fields (grassland or arable) thereby contributing to their own carbon budgets. To avoid double counting, we only attribute to a given grassland field the surplus, if any, of decomposed C manure that it generates compared to the amount of manure it receives (Figure 3). On-site decomposition of manure C supplied to the studied grassland field contributes to ecosystem respiration (; equation (2)) and is therefore not double counted as an off-site CO2 flux.

Figure 3 Carbon fluxes (g C/m2 per year) in managed European grassland systems studied by Soussana et al. (2007). Net carbon storage in the barn (NCS@barn) in (a) cut and grazed and (b) cut only grasslands are calculated as the balance of carbon fluxes. , Fanimal-products@barn and Flabile-C-losses are, respectively, CO2 emissions, C exports in animal products from ruminants and CO2 losses from microbial degradation of farm effluents during storage and after spreading. and are the CH4 emissions at barn from enteric fermentation and farm effluents, respectively. For other abbreviations, see Figure 1. Carbon fluxes at barn were estimated assuming the same type of production (meat or milk) in the barn and in the grassland and solid manure (see equation (4)). C exports in animal products at barn were assumed to be 2% and 20% of C intake for meat and milk production, respectively (see text).

Off-site C sequestration (NCS@barn) is calculated as the SOC derived from cut herbage manure that is not returned to the grassland, taking into account CH4 emission from manure management. By adding off-site C sequestration and on-site C sequestration (NCS), an attributed NCS (Att-NCS) is calculated as:


where fhumif is the fraction of non-labile C in manure, fdigest is the proportion of ingested C that is digestible and is methane emission from farm effluents calculated according to IPCC (2006) Tier 2 method in CO2-C equivalents (Figure 3). The fraction of non-labile C in manure (fhumif) varies between 0.25 and 0.45 (Soussana et al., 2004).

Equation (3) assumes that (i) all harvested C is ingested by ruminants (no post-harvest losses), and (ii) that the non-digestible fraction returned as excreta is used for spreading. These assumptions could lead to an overestimation of the attributed NCS, as additional C losses take place after forage harvests (during hay drying and silage fermentation) as well as in manure storage systems. However, these losses concern the degradable fraction of manures and are thus already accounted for by the fhumif coefficient.

NCS@barn reached 21.5 and 27 g C/m2 per year for mixed and cut systems, respectively. Therefore, Att-NCS, which includes NCS@barn, was higher in grazed (129 g C/m2 per year) than in cut and mixed grassland systems (98.5 and 71 g C/m2 per year, respectively). These estimates do not include C emissions from machinery, which are higher in cut (e.g. mowing, silage making) compared to grazed systems, but are not part of the AFOLU (Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses) sector and are not discussed in this review.

GHG balance during housing

GHG emissions from manure management include direct emissions of CH4 and N2O, as well as indirect emissions of N2O derived from NH3/NOx. Quantification of GHG emissions from manure are typically based on national statistics for manure production and housing systems combined with emission factors which have been defined by the IPCC or nationally (Petersen et al., 2002). The quality of GHG inventories for manure management is critically dependent on the applicability of these emission factors.

Animal manure is collected as solid manure and urine, as liquid manure (slurry) or as deep litter, or it is deposited outside in drylots or on pastures. These manure categories represent very different potentials for GHG emissions, as also reflected in the methane conversion factors and nitrous oxide emission factors, respectively. However, even within each category the variations in manure composition and storage conditions can lead to highly variable emissions in practice. This variability is a major source of error in the quantification of the GHG balance for a system. To the extent that such variability is influenced by management and/or local climatic conditions, it may be possible to improve the procedures for estimating CH4 and N2O emissions from manure (Sommer et al., 2004).

The fraction of non-labile C (fhumif) in manure increases from 0.25 to about 0.5 after composting (Rémy and Marin-La Flèche, 1976). During composting, the more degradable organic compounds are decomposed and the residual compounds, which tend to have a longer life span, increase in concentration. In one study, cumulative C losses during storage and after incubation in the soil accounted for 60% and 54% of C initially present in composted and anaerobically stored manure, respectively (Thomsen and Olesen, 2000).

In order to account for: (i) the offsite CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions resulting directly from the digestion by cattle of the forage harvests, (ii) the contribution to CH4 and N2O emissions by farm effluents and (iii) the manure and slurry applications which add organic C to the soil, an attributed net GHG balance (Att-NGHG) was adapted from Soussana et al. (2007) as:


where is CH4 emission by enteric fermentation at barn (g CH4/m2 per year), (g CH4/m2 per year) and (g N2O/m2 per year) are the CH4 and direct N2O emissions from farm effluents, respectively, which were calculated according to IPCC (2006) Tier 2 method (Table 2).

Estimated methane emissions at barn from cut herbage reached up to 447 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year (Table 2) and were therefore an important component of the attributed NGHG budget of the cut sites. The attributed GHG balance was positive for grazed sites (indicating a sink activity), but was negative for cut and mixed sites (indicating a source activity) (Table 2). Therefore, a grazing management seems to be a better strategy for removing GHG from the atmosphere than a cutting management. However, given that the studied sites differed in many respects (climate, soil and vegetation) (Soussana et al., 2007), this hypothesis needs to be further tested.

Taken together, these results show that managed grasslands have a potential to remove GHG from the atmosphere, but that the utilisation of the cut herbage by ruminants may lead to large non-CO2 GHG emissions in farm buildings, which may compensate this sink activity. Data from a larger number of flux sites and from long-term experiments will be required to upscale these results at regional scale and calculate GHG balance for a range of production systems. In order to further reduce uncertainties, C and N fluxes are investigated for a number of additional grassland and wetland sites (e.g. CarboEurope and NitroEurope research project). Grassland ecosystem simulation models have also been used for upscaling these fluxes (Levy et al., 2007; Vuichard et al., 2007a) in order to estimate the C and GHG balance at the scale of Europe. Two main problems were identified: (i) the lack of consistent grassland management data across Europe; (ii) the lack of detailed grassland soil C inventories for soil model initialisation (Vuichard et al., 2007a).

Including carbon sequestration in greenhouse gas budgets at farm scale

A grazing livestock farm consists in a productive unit that converts various resources into outputs as milk, meat and sometimes grains too. In Europe, many ruminant farms have mixed farming systems: they produce themselves the roughage and, most often, part of the animal’s feeds and even straw that is eventually needed for bedding. Conversely, these farms recycle animal manure by field application. Most farms purchase some inputs, such as fertilisers and feed, and they always use direct energy derived from fossil fuels. The net emissions of GHGs (methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide) are related to C and nitrogen flows and to environmental conditions.

To date, only few recent models has been developed to estimate the farm GHG balance (Schils et al., 2007). Most models have used fixed emission factors both for indoors and outdoors emissions (e.g. FARM GHG, Olesen et al., 2006, Lovett et al., 2006). Although, these models have considered the on- and off-farm CO2 emissions (e.g. from fossil fuel combustion), they did not include possible changes in soil C resulting from the farm management. Moreover, as static factors are used rather than dynamic simulations, the environmental dependency of the GHG fluxes is not captured by these models.

A dynamic farm scale model (FarmSim) has been coupled to mechanistic simulation models of grasslands (PASIM, Riedo et al., 1998; Vuichard et al., 2007b) and croplands (CERES ECC). In this way, C sequestration by grasslands can be simulated (Soussana et al., 2004) and included in the farm budget. The IPCC methodology Tier 1 and Tier 2 is used to calculate the CH4 and N2O emissions from cattle housing and waste management systems. The net GHG balance at the farm gate is calculated in CO2 equivalents. Emissions induced by the production and transport of farm inputs (fuel, electricity, N fertilisers and feedstuffs) are calculated using a full accounting scheme based on life cycle analysis. The FarmSim model has been applied to seven contrasted cattle farms in Europe (Salètes et al., 2004). The balance of the farm gate GHG fluxes leads to a sink activity for four out of the seven farms. When including pre-chain emissions related to inputs, all farms – but one – were found to be net sources of GHG. The total farm GHG balance varied between a sink of −70 and a source of +310 kg CO2 equivalents per unit (GJ) energy in animal farm products. Byrne et al. (2007), measuring C balance for two dairy farms in South West Ireland, equally considered the farm perimeter as the system boundary for inputs and outputs of C. In the two case studies, both farms appeared as net C sinks, sequestering between 200 and 215 g C/m2 per year (Table 1).

Farm scale mitigation options thus need to be carefully assessed at the production system scale, in order to minimise GHG emissions per unit meat or milk product (Schils et al., 2007). Advanced (Tier 3) and verifiable methodologies still need to be developed in order to include GHG removals obtained by farm scale mitigation options in agriculture, forestry and land use (AFOLU sector, IPCC, 2006) national GHG inventories.


This review shows that grassland C sequestration is detected both by C stock change (inventories and long-term experiments) and by C flux measurements, however with high variability across studies. Further development of measurement methods and of plot and farm scale models carefully tested at benchmark sites will help further reduce uncertainties. Low cost mitigation options based on enhancing C sequestration in grasslands are available. Mitigating emissions and adapting livestock production systems to climate change will nevertheless require a major international collaborative effort and the development of extended observational networks combining C (and non-CO2-GHG) flux measurements and long-term experiments to detect C stock changes. Carbon sequestration could play an important role in climate mitigation, but because of its potential reversibility preserving current soil C stocks and reducing CH4 and N2O emissions is strongly needed.


Tiphaine Tallec is funded by a research grant from the French Ministry for Research and Higher Education. This research was funded by the EC FP6 ‘CarboEurope IP’ and ‘NitroEurope IP’ projects.


Allard, V, Soussana, JF, Falcimagne, R, Berbigier, P, Bonnefond, JM, Ceschia, E, D’hour, P, Hénault, C, Laville, P, Martin, C, Pinarès-Patino, C 2007. The role of grazing management for the net biome productivity and greenhouse gas budget (CO2, N2O and CH4) of semi-natural grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 4758.
Ammann, C, Flechard, CR, Leifeld, J, Neftel, A, Fuhrer, J 2007. The carbon budget of newly established temperate grassland depends on management intensity. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 121, 520.
Baldocchi, D, Meyers, T 1998. On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 90, 125.
Baldock, JA, Skjemstad, JO 2000. Role of the matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Organic Geochemistry 31, 697710.
Balesdent, J, Balabane, M 1996. Major contribution of roots to soil carbon storage inferred from maize cultivated soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 12611263.
Bellamy, PH, Loveland, PJ, Bradley, RI, Lark, RM, Kirk, GJD 2005. Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003. Nature 437, 245248.
Beniston, M 2004. The 2003 heat wave in Europe: a shape of things to come? An analysis based on Swiss climatological data and model simulations. Geophysical Research Letters 31, L02202, doi:10.1029/2003GL018857.
Betts, RA, Cox, PM, Collins, M, Harris, PP, Huntingford, C, Jones, CD 2004. The role of ecosystem–atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest dieback under global climate warming. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 78, 157175.
Bird, SB, Herrick, JE, Wander, MM, Wright, SF 2002. Spatial heterogeneity of aggregate stability and soil carbon in semi-arid rangeland. Environmental Pollution 116, 445455.
Boeckx, P, Van Cleemput, O 2001. Estimates of N2O and CH4 fluxes from agricultural lands in various regions in Europe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60, 3547.
Bony, S, Colman, R, Kattsov, VM, Allan, RP, Bretherton, CS, Dufresne, JL, Hall, A, Hallegatte, S, Holland, MM, Ingram, W, Randall, DA, Soden, DJ, Tselioudis, G, Webb, MJ 2006. How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? Journal of Climate 19, 34453482.
Bossuyt, H, Six, J, Hendrix, PF 2005. Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37, 251258.
Byrne, KA, Kiely, G, Leahy, P 2005. CO2 fluxes in adjacent new and permanent temperate grasslands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 135, 8292.
Byrne, KA, Kiely, G, Leahy, P 2007. Carbon sequestration determined using farm scale carbon balance and eddy covariance. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 121, 357364.
Cannell, MGR, Milne, R, Hargreaves, KJ, Brown, TAW, Cruickshank, MM, Bradley, RI, Spencer, T, Hope, D, Billett, MF, Adger, WN, Subak, S 1999. National inventories of terrestrial carbon sources and sinks: the UK experience. Climatic Change 42, 505530.
Chevallier, T, Voltz, M, Blanchart, E, Chotte, JL, Eschenbrenner, V, Mahieu, M, Albrecht, A 2000. Spatial and temporal changes of soil C after establishment of a pasture on a long-term cultivated vertisol (Martinique). Geoderma 94, 4358.
Ciais, P, Reichstein, M, Viovy, N, Granier, A, Ogee, J, Allard, V, Aubinet, M, Buchmann, N, Bernhofer, C, Carrara, A, Chevallier, F, De Noblet, N, Friend, AD, Friedlingstein, P, Grunwald, T, Heinesch, B, Keronen, P, Knohl, A, Krinner, G, Loustau, D, Manca, G, Matteucci, G, Miglietta, F, Ourcival, JM, Papale, D, Pilegaard, K, Rambal, S, Seufert, G, Soussana, JF, Sanz, MJ, Schulze, ED, Vesala, T, Valentini, R 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529533.
Clayton, H, McTaggart, IP, Parker, J, Swan, L, Smith, KA 1997. Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilised grassland: a 2-year study of the effects of N fertiliser form and environmental conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25, 252260.
CLIMSOIL 2008. Review of existing information on the interrelations between soil and climate change. Final report of the ClimSoil project, contract number 070307/2007/486157/SER/B1. European Commission, December 2008.
Conant, RT, Paustian, K, Elliott, ET 2001. Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecological Applications 11, 343355.
Conant, RT, Easter, M, Paustian, K, Swan, A, Williams, S 2007. Impacts of periodic tillage on soil C stocks: a synthesis. Soil and Tillage Research 95, 110.
Crutzen, PJ, Mosier, AR, Smith, KA, Winiwarter, W 2007. N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussion 7, 1119111205.
Davison, B, Brunner, A, Ammann, C, Spirig, C, Jocher, M, Neftel, A 2008. Cut-induced VOC emissions from agricultural grasslands. Plant Biology 10, 7685.
De Mazancourt, C, Loreau, M, Abbadie, L 1998. Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79, 22422252.
Delgado, CL 2005. Rising demand for meat and milk in developing countries: implications for grasslands-based livestock production. In ‘Grassland: a global resource’, Proceedings of the XXth International Grassland Congress, Dublin, Ireland (ed. DA McGilloway), pp. 2939. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dueck, TA, de Visser, R, Poorter, H, Persijn, S, Gorissen, A, de Visser, W, Shapendonk, A, Vergahen, J, Snel, J, Harren, FJM, Ngai, AKY, Verstappen, F, Bouwmeester, H, Voesenek, LACJ, Van Der Werf, A 2007. No evidence for substantial aerobic methane emission by terrestrial plants: a 13C-labelling approach. New Phytologist 175, 2935.
Emmerich, WE 2003. Carbon dioxide fluxes in a semiarid environment with high carbonate soils. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 116, 91102.
Faverdin, P, Maxin, G, Chardon, X, Brunschwig, P, Vermorel, M 2007. A model to predict the carbon balance of a dairy cow. In ‘Elevage et environnement’, Proceedings of the XIVth symposium Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, Paris, France, p. 66.
Fearnside, PM 2000. Global warming and tropical land-use change: Greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning, decomposition and soils in forest conversion, shifting cultivation and secondary vegetation. Climatic Change 46, 115158.
Firbank, LG, Smart, SM, Crabb, J, Crabb, J, Critchley, CNR, Fowbert, JW, Fuller, RJ, Gladders, P, Green, DB, Henderson, I, Hill, MO 2003. Agronomic and ecological costs and benefits of set-aside in England. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 95, 7385.
Fitter, AH, Graves, JD, Wolfenden, J, Self, GK, Brown, TK, Bogie, D, Mansfield, TA 1997. Root production and turnover and carbon budgets of two contrasting grasslands under ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. New Phytologist 137, 47255.
Flanagan, LB, Wever, LA, Carlson, PJ 2002. Seasonal and interannual variation in carbon dioxide exchange and carbon balance in a northern temperate grassland. Global Change Biology 8, 599615.
Flechard, CR, Ambus, P, Skiba, U, Rees, RM, Hensen, A, van Amstel, A, van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A, Soussana, JF, Jones, M, Clifton-Brown, J, Raschi, A, Horvath, L, Neftel, A, Jocher, M, Ammann, C, Leifeld, J, Fuhrer, J, Calanca, P, Thalman, E, Pilegaard, K, Di Marco, C, Campbell, C, Nemitz, E, Hargreaves, KJ, Levy, PE, Ball, BC, Jones, SK, van de Bulk, WCM, Groot, T, Blom, M, Domingues, R, Kasper, G, Allard, V, Ceschia, E, Cellier, P, Laville, P, Henault, C, Bizouard, F, Abdalla, M, Williams, M, Baronti, S, Berreti, F, Grosz, B 2007. Effects of climate and management intensity on nitrous oxide emissions in grassland systems across Europe. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 121, 135152.
Flechard, CR, Neftel, A, Jocher, M, Ammann, C, Fuhrer, J 2005. Bi-directional soil/atmosphere N2O exchange over two mown grassland systems with contrasting management practices. Global Change Biology 11, 21142127.
Follett, RF, Samson-Liebig, SE, Kimble, JM, Pruessner, E, Waltman, SW 2001. Carbon sequestration under the conservation reserve program in the historic grazing land soils of the United States of America. In Soil C sequestration and the greenhouse effect (ed. R Lal), pp. 57, 27–40. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
Follett, RF, Kimble, J, Leavitt, SW, Pruessner, E 2004. Potential use of soil C isotope analyses to evaluate paleoclimate. Soil Science 169, 471488.
Follett, RF, Schuman, GE 2005. Grazing land contributions to carbon sequestration. In ‘Grassland: a global resource’, Proceedings of the XXth International Grassland Congress, Dublin, Ireland (ed. DA McGilloway), pp. 265277. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Fontaine, S, Mariotti, A, Abbadie, L 2003. The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35, 837843.
Fontaine, S, Barot, S, Barre, P, Bdioui, N, Mary, B, Rumpel, C 2007. Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450, 277281.
FAO 2006. Livestock’s long shadows: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome.
Frank, AB, Dugas, WA 2001. Carbon dioxide fluxes over a northern, semiarid, mixed-grass prairie. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 108, 317326.
Ganjegunte, GK, Vance, GF, Preston, CM, Schuman, GE, Ingram, LJ, Stahl, PD, Welker, JM 2005. Soil organic carbon composition in a northern mixed-grass prairie: effects of grazing. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 17461756.
Gilmanov, T, Soussana, JF, Aires, L, Allard, V, Amman, C, Balzarolo, M, Barcza, Z, Bernhofer, C, Campbell, CL, Cernusca, A, Cescatti, A, Clifton-Brown, J, Dirks, BOM, Dore, S, Eugster, W, Fuhrer, J, Gimeno, C, Gruenwald, T, Haszpra, L, Hensen, A, Ibrom, A, Jacobs, AFG, Jones, MB, Lanigan, G, Laurila, T, Lohila, A, Manca, G, Marcolla, B, Nagy, Z, Pilegaard, K, Pinter, K, Raschi, A, Rogiers, N, Sanz, MJ, Stefani, P, Sutton, M, Tuba, Z, Valentini, R, Williams, ML, Wohlfahrt, G 2007. Partitioning European grassland net ecosystem CO2 exchange into gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration using light response function analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 93120.
Gilmanov, TG, Tieszen, LL, Wylie, BK, Flanagan, LB, Frank, AB, Haferkamp, MR, Meyers, TP, Morgan, JA 2005. Integration of CO2 flux and remotely-sensed data for primary production and ecosystem respiration analyses in the Northern Great Plains: potential for quantitative spatial extrapolation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14, 271292.
Goidts, E, van Wesemael, B 2007. Regional assessment of soil organic carbon changes under agriculture in Southern Belgium (1955–2005). Geoderma 141, 341354.
Hector, A, Schmid, B, Beierkuhnlein, C, Caldeira, MC, Diemer, M, Dimitrakopoulos, PG, Finn, JA, Freitas, H, Giller, PS, Good, J, Harris, R, Hogberg, P, Huss-Danell, K, Joshi, J, Jumpponen, A, Korner, C, Leadley, PW, Loreau, M, Minns, A, Mulder, CPH, O’Donovan, G, Otway, SJ, Pereira, JS, Prinz, A, Read, DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen, M, Schulze, ED, Siamantziouras, ASD, Spehn, EM, Terry, AC, Troumbis, AY, Woodward, FI, Yachi, S, Lawton, JH 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286, 11231127.
Hendriks, DMD, van Huissteden, J, Dolman, AJ, van der Molen, MK 2007. The full greenhouse gas balance of an abandoned peat meadow. Biogeosciences 4, 411424.
Hunt, JE, Kelliher, FM, McSeveny, TM, Ross, DJ, Whitehead, D 2004. Long-term carbon exchange in a sparse, seasonally dry tussock grassland. Global Change Biology 10, 17851800.
IPCC 1996. Revised guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IPCC 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis (Contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment report of the IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IPCC 2006. Good practice guidance on land use change and forestry in national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Tokyo, Japan.
IPCC 2007. Climate change 2007: the scientific basis (Contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment report of the IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jaksic, V, Kiely, G, Albertson, J, Oren, R, Katul, G, Leahy, P, Byrne, KA 2006. Net ecosystem exchange of grassland in contrasting wet and dry years. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139, 323334.
Janssens, IA, Freibauer, A, Ciais, P, Smith, P, Nabuurs, GJ, Folberth, G, Schlamadinger, B, Hutjes, RWA, Ceulemans, R, Schulze, ED, Valentini, R, Dolman, AJ 2003. Europe’s terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science 300, 15381542.
Jones, MB, Donnelly, A 2004. Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2. New Phytologist 164, 423439.
Keppler, F, Hamilton, JTG, Brass, M, Rockmann, T 2006. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 439, 187191.
Klein, JA, Harte, J, Zhao, XQ 2005. Dynamic and complex microclimate responses to warming and grazing manipulations. Global Change Biology 11, 14401451.
Klumpp, K, Soussana, JF, Falcimagne, R 2007. Effects of past and current disturbance on carbon cycling in grassland mesocosms. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 121, 5973.
Klumpp, K, Soussana, JF 2009. Using functional traits to predict grassland ecosystem change: a mathematical test of the response-and-effect approach. Global Change Biology, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01905.x (in press; available on line).
Lal, R 1999. Long-term tillage and wheel traffic effects on soil quality for two central Ohio soils. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 14, 6784.
Lal, R 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 16231627.
Leahy, P, Kiely, G, Scanlon, TM 2004. Managed grasslands: a greenhouse gas sink or source? Geophysical Research Letters 31, L20507, doi:10.1029/2004GL021161.
Lehner, B, Doll, P, Alcamo, J, Henrichs, T, Kaspar, F 2006. Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis. Climatic Change 75, 273299.
Lemaire, G, Chapman, D 1996. Tissue flows in grazed plant communities. In The ecology and management of grazing systems (ed. J Hodgson and AW Illius), pp. 335. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Lettens, S, Van Orshovena, J, van Wesemael, B, De Vos, B, Muys, B 2005b. Stocks and fluxes of soil organic carbon for landscape units in Belgium derived from heterogeneous data sets for 1990 and 2000. Geoderma 127, 1123.
Lettens, S, van Orshoven, J, van Wesemael, B, Muys, B, Perrin, D 2005a. Soil organic carbon changes in landscape units of Belgium between 1960 and 2000 with reference to 1990. Global Change Biology 11, 21282140.
Levy, PE, Mobbs, DC, Jones, SK, Milne, R, Campbell, C, Sutton, MA 2007. Simulation of fluxes of greenhouse gases from European grasslands using the DNDC model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 186192.
Lloyd, CR 2006. Annual carbon balance of a managed wetland meadow in the Somerset Levels, UK. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 138, 168179.
Loiseau, P, Soussana, JF 1999. Elevated CO2, temperature increase and N supply effects on the accumulation of below-ground carbon in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Plant and Soil 212, 123134.
Lovett, DK, Shalloo, L, Dillon, P, O’Mara, FP 2006. A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime. Agricultural Systems 88, 156179.
Martin, C, Morgavi, DP, Doreau, M 2009. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal (in press).
Meehl, GA, Tebaldi, C 2004. More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305, 994997.
Morgan, JA, Pataki, DE, Korner, C, Clark, H, Del Grosso, SJ, Grunzweig, JM, Knapp, AK, Mosier, AR, Newton, PCD, Niklaus, PA, Nippert, JB, Nowak, RS, Parton, WJ, Polley, HW, Shaw, MR 2004. Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2. Oecologia 140, 1125.
Nelson, JDJ, Schoenau, JJ, Malhi, SS 2008. Soil organic carbon changes and distribution in cultivated and restored grassland soils in Saskatchewan. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 82, 137148.
Nieveen, JP, Campbell, DI, Schipper, LA, Blair, IANJ 2005. Carbon exchange of grazed pasture on a drained peat soil. Global Change Biology 11, 607618.
Nemani, RR, Keeling, CD, Hashimoto, H, Jolly, WM, Piper, SC, Tucker, CJ, Myneni, RB, Running, SW 2003. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net Primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300, 15601563.
Ogle, SM, Conant, RT, Paustian, K 2004. Deriving grassland management factors for a carbon accounting method developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Environmental Management 33, 474484.
Ojima, DS, Parton, WJ, Schimel, DS, Scurlock, JMO, Kittel, TGF 1993. Modeling the effects of climatic and CO2 changes on grassland storage of soil C. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 70, 643657.
Olesen, JE, Schelde, K, Weiske, A, Weisbjerg, MR, Asman, WAH, Djurhuus, J 2006. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 112, 207220.
Paustian, K, Cole, CV, Sauerbeck, D, Sampson, N 1998. CO2 mitigation by agriculture: an overview. Climatic Change 40, 135162.
Personeni, E, Loiseau, P 2004. How does the nature of living and dead roots affect the residence time of carbon in the root litter continuum? Plant and Soil 267, 129141.
Personeni, E, Loiseau, P 2005. Species strategy and N fluxes in grassland soil – a question of root litter quality or rhizosphere activity? European Journal of Agronomy 22, 217229.
Petersen, BM, Olesen, JE, Heidmann, T 2002. A flexible tool for simulation of soil carbon turnover. Ecological Modelling 151, 114.
Phillips, RL, Beeri, O 2008. Scaling-up knowledge of growing-season net ecosystem exchange for long-term assessment of North Dakota grasslands under the Conservation Reserve Program. Global Change Biology 14, 10081017.
Piao, S, Fang, J, Ciais, P, Peylin, P, Huang, Y, Sitch, S, Wang, T 2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458, 10091013.
Picon-Cochard, P, Teyssonneyre, F, Besle, JM, Soussana, JF 2004. Effects of elevated CO2 and cutting frequency on the productivity and herbage quality of a semi-natural grassland. European Journal of Agronomy 20, 363377.
Pinares-Patino, CS, D’Hour, P, Jouany, JP, Martin, C 2007. Effects of stocking rate on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from grazing cattle. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 121, 3046.
Potter, KN, Torbert, HA, Johnson, HB, Tischler, CR 1999. Carbon storage after long-term grass establishment on degraded soils. Soil Science 164, 718725.
Rémy, JC, Marin-La Flèche, A 1976. L’entretien organique des terres. Coût d’une politique de l’humus. Entreprises Agricoles 11, 6367.
Reynolds, SG, Batello, C, Baas, S, Mack, S 2005. Grassland and forage to improve livelihoods and reduce poverty. In ‘Grassland: a global resource’, Proceedings of the XXth International Grassland Congress, Dublin, Ireland (ed. DA McGilloway), pp. 323338. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Riedo, M, Grub, A, Rosset, M, Fuhrer, J 1998. A pasture simulation model for dry matter production and fluxes of carbon, nitrogen, water and energy. Ecological Modelling 105, 141183.
Robertson, GP, Paul, EA, Harwood, RR 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289, 19221925.
Robles, MD, Burke, IC 1998. Soil organic matter recovery on conservation reserve program fields in southeastern Wyoming. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62, 725730.
Rogiers, N, Conen, F, Furger, M, Stöcklis, R, Eugster, W 2008. Impact of past and present land-management on the C-balance of a grassland in the Swiss Alps. Global Change Biology 14, 26132625.
Röscher, C, Temperton, VM, Scherer-Lorenzen, M, Schmitz, M, Schumacher, J, Schmid, B, Buchmann, N, Weisser, WW, Schulze, ED 2005. Overyielding in experimental grassland communities – irrespective of species pool or spatial scale. Ecology Letters 8, 419429.
Salètes, S, Fiorelli, JL, Vuichard, N, Cambou, J, Olesen, JE, Hacala, S, Sutton, M, Furhrer, J, Soussana, JF 2004. Greenhouse gas balance of cattle breeding farms and assessment of mitigation option. In Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture Conference, Leipzig, Germany (10–12 February 2004), pp. 203–208.
Schär, C, Jendritzky, G 2004. Climate change: hot news from summer 2003. Nature 432, 559560.
Schils, RLM, Olesen, JE, del Prado, A, Soussana, JF 2007. A review of a farm level modelling approach for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Livestock Science 112, 240251.
Schlesinger, WH 1990. Evidence from chronosequence studies for a low carbon-storage potential of soils. Nature 348, 232234.
Siemens, J 2003. The European carbon budget: a gap. Science 302, 16811681.
Six, J, Callewaert, P, Lenders, S, De Gryze, S, Morris, SJ, Gregorich, EG, Paul, EA, Paustian, K 2002. Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 19811987.
Skiba, U, Smith, KA 2000. The control of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural and natural soils. Chemosphere Global Change Science 2, 379386.
Smith, JU, Smith, P, Wattenbach, M, Zaehle, S, Hiederer, R, Jones, RJA, Montanarella, L, Rounsevell, M, Reginster, I, Ewert, F 2005. Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080. Global Change Biology 11, 21412152.
Smith, P, Chapman, SJ, Scott, WA, Black, HIJ, Wattenbach, M, Milne, R, Campbell, CD, Lilly, A, Ostle, N, Levy, PE, Lumsdon, DG, Millard, P, Towers, W, Zaehle, Z, Smith, JU 2007. Climate change cannot be entirely responsible for soil carbon loss observed in England and Wales, 1978–2003. Global Change Biology 13, 26052609.
Sommer, SG, Petersen, SO, Moller, HB 2004. Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 69, 143154.
Soussana, JF, Hartwig, UA 1996. The effects of elevated CO2 on symbiotic N2 fixation: a link between the carbon and nitrogen cycles in grassland ecosystems. Plant and Soil 187, 321332.
Soussana, JF, Casella, E, Loiseau, P 1996. Long-term effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature increase on a temperate grass sward. 2. Plant nitrogen budgets and root fraction. Plant and Soil 182, 101114.
Soussana, JF, Allard, V, Pilegaard, K, Ambus, C, Campbell, C, Ceschia, E, Clifton-Brown, J, Czobel, S, Domingues, R, Flechard, C, Fuhrer, J, Hensen, A, Horvath, L, Jones, M, Kasper, G, Martin, C, Nagy, Z, Neftel, A, Raschi, A, Baronti, S, Rees, RM, Skiba, U, Stefani, P, Manca, G, Sutton, M, Tuba, Z, Valentini, R 2007. Full accounting of the greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4) budget of nine European grassland sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 121134.
Soussana, JF, Loiseau, P, Vuichard, N, Ceschia, E, Balesdent, J, Chevallier, T, Arrouays, D 2004. Carbon cycling and sequestration opportunities in temperate grasslands. Soil Use and Management 20, 219230.
Suyker, AE, Verma, SB 2001. Year-round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biology 7, 279289.
Teyssonneyre, F, Picon-Cochard, C, Falcimagne, R, Soussana, JF 2002. Effects of elevated CO2 and cutting frequency on plant community structure in a temperate grassland. Global Change Biology 8, 10341046.
Thomas, CD, Cameron, A, Green, RE, Bakkenes, M, Beaumont, LJ, Collingham, YC, Erasmus, BF, De Siqueira, MF, Grainger, A, Hannah, L, Hughes, L, Huntley, B, Van Jaarsveld, AS, Midgley, GF, Miles, L, Ortega-Huerta, MA, Peterson, AT, Phillips, OL, Williams, SE 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145148.
Thomsen, IK, Olesen, JE 2000. C and N mineralization of composted and anaerobically stored ruminant manure in differently textured soils. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cambridge 135, 151159.
Thuiller, W, Lavorel, S, Araujo, MB, Sykes, MT, Prentice, IC 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 82458250.
Tilman, D, Lehman, CL, Thomson, KT 1997. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 18571861.
Tilman, D, Reich, PB, Knops, JMH 2006a. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629632.
Tilman, D, Reich, PB, Knops, JMH 2006b. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high diversity grassland biomass. Science 314, 15981600.
Tubiello, F, Soussana, JF, Howden, SM, Easterling, W 2007. Crop and pasture response to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 1968619690.
US-EPA 2006. Global anthropogenic non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions: 1990–2020 (EPA 430-R-06-003), US-EPA, Washington, DC.
Van der Werf, GR, Randerson, JT, Giglio, L, Collatz, GJ, Kasibhatla, PS, Arellano, AF 2006. Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 6, 34233441.
Van Oost, K, Quine, TA, Govers, G, De Gryze, S, Six, J, Harden, JW, Ritchie, JC, McCarty, GW, Heckrath, G, Kosmas, C, Giraldez, JV, da Silva, JRM, Merckx, R 2007. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle. Science 318, 626629.
Velthof, GL, Oenema, O 1997. Nitrous oxide emission from dairy farming systems in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 45, 347360.
Vleeshouwers, LM, Verhagen, A 2002. Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for Europe. Global Change Biology 8, 519530.
Vuichard, N, Ciais, P, Viovy, N, Calanca, P, Soussana, JF 2007a. Estimating the greenhouse gas fluxes of European grasslands with a process-based model: 2. Simulations at the continental level. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 21, GB1005, doi:10.1029/2005GB002612.
Vuichard, N, Soussana, JF, Ciais, P, Viovy, N, Ammann, C, Calanca, P, Clifton-Brown, J, Fuhrer, J, Jones, M, Martin, C 2007b. Estimating the greenhouse gas fluxes of European grasslands with a process-based model: 1. Model evaluation from in situ measurements. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 21, GB1004, doi:10.1029/2005GB002611.
Xu, LK, Baldocchi, DD 2004. Seasonal variation in carbon dioxide exchange over a Mediterranean annual grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 123, 7996.
Zavaleta, ES, Shaw, MR, Chiariello, NR, Mooney, HA, Field, CB 2003. Additive effects of simulated climate changes, elevated CO2, and nitrogen deposition on grassland diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 76507654.