Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Profitability of a dairy sheep genetic improvement program using artificial insemination

  • G. E. Valergakis (a1), A. I. Gelasakis (a1), G. Oikonomou (a1), G. Arsenos (a1), P. Fortomaris (a1) and G. Banos (a1)...
Abstract

This simulation study investigated the farm-level economic benefits of a genetic improvement scheme using artificial insemination (AI) with fresh ram semen in dairy sheep of the Chios breed in Greece. Data were collected from 67 farms associated with the Chios Sheep Breeders’ Cooperative ‘Macedonia’, describing the percentage of ewes that would be artificially inseminated in the flock, pregnancy rate, annual ram costs that could be saved using AI rather than natural mating, expected improvement in milk production, annual costs of semen and feed, milk price and number of years of AI usage. The study considered 77 760 possible scenarios in a 3 × 4 × 4 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 4 × 15 factorial arrangement. Analysis of variance was used to investigate the effect of each factor on farm profitability. All factors considered were statistically significant (P < 0.001), but their effect varied. The number of years using AI had the greatest effect on profitability and farmers should become aware that using AI is a long-term investment. Semen price, pregnancy rate and improvement in milk production also had substantial effects. The price of milk and feed had a considerably lower effect on profitability, as did the annual cost of maintaining rams that would be replaced by AI. A positive annual and cumulative return was achieved in the model within the first 6 years. The cost of semen was estimated at 8€ to 10€ per dose for the first 5 years. Where the annual improvement in milk production was 1% of annual phenotypic mean (e.g. 3.0 kg) profitability of the scheme was improved greatly.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Profitability of a dairy sheep genetic improvement program using artificial insemination
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Profitability of a dairy sheep genetic improvement program using artificial insemination
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Profitability of a dairy sheep genetic improvement program using artificial insemination
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: geval@vet.auth.gr
References
Hide All
Abbott, KA 1994. Cost–benefit evaluation of artificial insemination for genetic improvement of wool-producing sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 71, 353360.
Anon 2008. Les filières ovines dans l’UE. Des moutons bien mal gardés. Rédaction: Département Economie (GEB). Novembre 2008, no. 383, Institut de l’élevage, Paris, France.
Arranz, JM, Freret, S, Fidelle, F, Fatet, A, Druart, X, Beckers, JF, Sulon, J, Sousa, NM, Bodin, L, David, I, Lagriffoul, G, Beltran de Heredia, I, Sasieta, L, Arrese, F, Maeztu Sardina, F, Lana Soto, MP, Lasarte, M 2008. Réussite a l’insémination en élevages ovins laitiers pyrénéens: facteurs de variation lies aux conduits de troupeaux. Les Journées 3R, Paris, France.
Barillet, F, Marie, C, Jacquin, M, Lagriffoul, G, Astruc, JM 2001. The French Lacaune dairy sheep breed: use in France and abroad in the last 40 years. Livestock Production Science 71, 1729.
Boyazoglu, J, Morand-Fehr, P 2001. Mediterranean dairy sheep and goat products and their quality: a critical review. Small Ruminant Research 40, 111.
Chios Sheep Breeders Cooperative ‘Macedonia’ 2004. Sheep of the Chios breed. Annual Bulletin. Chios Sheep Breeders Cooperative ‘Macedonia’, Thessaloniki, Greece.
David, I, Robert-Granié, C, Manfredi, E, Lagriffoul, G, Bodin, L 2008a. Environmental and genetic variation factors of artificial insemination success in French dairy sheep. Animal 2, 979986.
David, I, Leymarie, C, Lagriffoul, G, Manfredi, E, Robert-Granié, C, Bodin, I 2008b. Facteurs de variation génétiques et environnementaux de la production de semences et de la réussite de l’insémination artificielle en ovin. Les Journées 3R, Paris, France.
deRancourt, M, Fois, N, Lavin, MP, Tchakérian, E, Vallerand, F 2006. Mediterranean sheep and goat production: an uncertain future. Small Ruminant Research 62, 167179.
Donovan, A, Hanrahan, JP, Kummen, E, Duffy, P, Boland, MP 2004. Fertility in the ewe following cervical insemination with fresh or frozen-thawed semen at a natural or synchronised oestrus. Animal Reproduction Science 84, 359368.
Evans, G, Maxwell, WMC 1987. Salamon’s Artificial Insemination of Sheep and Goats, p. 194. Butterworths, Sydney.
Eurostat 2004. Agricultural statistics – Quarterly Bulletin 1/2004. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Fatet, A, Leboeuf, B, Freret, S, Druart, X, Bodin, L, Caillât, H, David, I, Palhière, I, Boué, P, Lagriffoul, G 2008. L’insémination dans les filières ovines et caprines. Les Journées 3R, Paris, France.
Garrick, D 2005. A systematic approach to the design and enhancement of breeding programs. Abstracts of the 56th Annual Meeting of the EAAP, p. 318. Uppsala, Sweden.
Gelasakis, AI, Arsenos, G, Valergakis, GE, Fortomaris, P 2009. A proposed novel breeding system for intensively reared dairy flocks (poster presentation). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the British Society of Animal Science, Southport, UK, p. 179.
Gelasakis, AI, Valergakis, GE, Arsenos, G, Basdagianni, Z, Sinapis, E, Banos, G 2008. Reproductive management in Chios breed flocks of the “Macedonia” Cooperative (in Greek). Animal Science Review, Special edition no. 34, Hellenic Association of Animal Science, pp. 94–95.
Gordon, I 1997. In: Controlled Reproduction in Sheep and Goats (ed. Gordon I) vol. 2, pp. 116145. CAB International, UK.
Hassoun, P, Bocquier, F 2007. Alimentation des ovins. In Tables INRA 2007, pp. 121136. Editions Quae, Versailles, France.
Hygate, L 2002. Improving profitability of Merino properties through the rational use of artificial insemination and objective measurement in sheep selection. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 50, 417422.
Kuehn, LA, Lewis, RM, Notter, DR 2007. Managing the risk of comparing estimated breeding values across flocks or herds through connectedness: a review and application. Genetics Selection Evolution 39, 225247.
Lewis, RM, Simm, G 2000. Selection strategies in sire referencing schemes in sheep. Livestock Production Science 67, 129141.
Lindsay, D, Skerritt, J 2003. Improved breeding in dairy goats and milking sheep, publication no. 02/150, pp. 2739. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Kingston ACT, Australia.
Morand-Fehr, P, Boyazoglu, J 1999. Present state and future outlook of the small ruminant sector. Small Ruminant Research 34, 175188.
Nicholas, FW 1996. Genetic improvement through reproductive technology. Animal Reproduction Science 42, 205214.
Perret, G, Castres, A 2001. Compte rendu annuel sur l’insémination artificielle ovine, Campagne 2000, CR no. 3063, Août 2001. Institut de l’élevage, Paris, France.
Salamon, S, Maxwell, WMC 1995. Frozen storage of ram semen. II. Causes of low fertility after cervical insemination and methods of improvement. Animal Reproduction Science 38, 136.
Smulders, JP, Serrano, M, Perez-Guzman, MD, Jimenez, MA, Uribe, H, Jurado, JJ 2007. Stochastic simulation of Manchega sheep breed selection scheme. Impact of artificial insemination, progeny testing system and nucleus size on genetic progress and inbreeding. Livestock Science 106, 218231.
Thomas, DL 2004. Overview of the dairy sheep sector in Canada and the United States. Proceedings of the 10th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium, November 4–6, pp. 166–177. Hudson, WI, USA.
Valergakis, GE, Arsenos, G, Basdagianni, Z, Banos, G 2008. Grouping strategies and lead factors for ration formulation in milking ewes of the Chios breed. Livestock Science 115, 211218.
Valergakis, GE, Gelasakis, AI, Arsenos, G, Basdagianni, Z, Banos, G 2009. Rearing costs of Chios rams and breeding costs per ewe (in Greek). Animal Science Review, special edition no. 35, Hellenic Association of Animal Science (in press).
Windsor, DP, Szell, AZ, Buschbeck, C, Edward, AY, Milton, JTB, Buckrell, BC 1994. Transervical artificial insemination of Australian Merino ewes with frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 42, 147157.
Zygogiannis, D 2006. Sheep production in the world and in Greece. Small Ruminant Research 62, 143147.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed