Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:44:16.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between chemical composition and in situ rumen degradation characteristics of maize silages in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2014

M. Ali ,
G. van Duinkerken ,
J. W. Cone ,
A. Klop ,
M. C. Blok ,
J. W. Spek ,
M. H. Bruinenberg  and
W. H. Hendriks
M. Ali*
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
G. van Duinkerken
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
J. W. Cone
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. Klop
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
M. C. Blok
Affiliation:
Product Board Animal Feed, PO Box 908, 2700 AX Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
J. W. Spek
Affiliation:
Product Board Animal Feed, PO Box 908, 2700 AX Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
M. H. Bruinenberg
Affiliation:
BLGG Research, PO Box 170, 6700 AD Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. H. Hendriks
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.163, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: drmubarak434@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Several in situ studies have been conducted on maize silages to determine the effect of individual factors such as maturity stage, chop length and ensiling of maize crop on the rumen degradation but the information on the relationship between chemical composition and in situ rumen degradation characteristics remains scarce. The objectives of this study were to determine and describe relationships between the chemical composition and the rumen degradation characteristics of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), CP, starch and aNDFom (NDF assayed with a heat stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash) of maize silages. In all, 75 maize silage samples were selected, with a broad range in chemical composition and quality parameters. The samples were incubated in the rumen for 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 72 and 336 h, using the nylon bag technique. Large range was found in the rumen degradable fractions of DM, OM, CP, starch and aNDFom because of the broad range in chemical composition and quality parameters. The new database with in situ rumen degradation characteristics of DM, OM, CP, starch and aNDFom of the maize silages was obtained under uniform experimental conditions; same cows, same incubation protocol and same chemical analysis procedures. Regression equations were developed with significant predictors (P<0.05) describing moderate and weak relationships between the chemical composition and the washout fraction, rumen undegradable fraction, potentially rumen degradable fraction, fractional degradation rate and effective rumen degradable fraction of DM, OM, CP, starch and aNDFom.

Keywords

in situ nylon bag techniquechemical compositionrumen degradation characteristicsmaize silagesregression equations
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 11 , November 2014 , pp. 1832 - 1838
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, M, Weisbjerg, MR, Cone, JW, van Duinkerken, G, Blok, MC, Bruinenberg, M and Hendriks, WH 2012. Postruminal degradation of crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and starch of maize and grass silages in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 177, 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arieli, A, Mabjeesh, SJ, Shabi, Z, Bruckental, I, Aharoni, Y, Zamwel, S and Tagari, H 1998. In situ assessment of degradability of organic matter in the rumen of the dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1985–1990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Marco, ON, Aello, M, Nomdedeu, M and Van Houtte, S 2002. Effect of maize crop maturity on silage chemical composition and digestibility (in vivo, in situ and in vitro). Animal Feed Science and Technology 99, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettle, T and Schwarz, FJ 2003. Effect of maize variety harvested at different maturity stages on feeding value and performance of dairy cows. Animal Research 52, 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, I, Nozière, P and Michalet-Doreau, B 2004. Site and extent of starch digestion of whole-plant maize silages differing in maturity stage and chop length, in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 89, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getachew, G, Robinson, PH, DePeters, EJ and Taylor, SJ 2004. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, J, Faría-Marmol, J, Arroyo, JM, Centeno, C and Martínez, A 2010. Effects of ensiling on in situ ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of corn forage. Archives of Animal Nutrition 64, 204–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habib, G, Khan, NA, Ali, M and Bezabih, M 2013. In situ ruminal crude protein degradability of cereal grains, oilseeds and animal by-product based protein feedstuffs. Livestock Science 153, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harazim, J, Třináctý, J and Homolka, P 2002. Degradability and intestinal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids of extracted rapeseed meal. Czech Journal of Animal Science 47, 50–56.Google Scholar
Hindle, VA, Van Vuuren, AM, Klop, A, Mathijssen-Kamman, AA, Van Gelder, AH and Cone, JW 2005. Site and extent of starch degradation in the dairy cow – a comparison between in vivo, in situ and in vitro measurements. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 89, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO 6492 1999. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of fat content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 6496 1999. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of moisture and other volatile matter content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 5984 2003. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of crude ash. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 15914 2005. Animal feeding stuffs – enzymatic determination of total starch content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 16472 2006. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre content (aNDF). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 13906 2008. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of acid detergent fibre and acid detergent lignin contents. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 5983 2009. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content – part 2: block digestion and steam distillation method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Jensen, C, Weisbjerg, MR, Nørgaard, P and Hvelplund, T 2005. Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 118, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L, Harrison, J, Hunt, C, Shinners, K, Doggett, C and Sapienza, D 1999. Nutritive value of corn silage as affected by maturity and mechanical processing: a contemporary review. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2813–2825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NEN 3571 1974. Test methods for feeding stuffs – determination of reducing sugar, crude total sugar, saccharose, and lactose. Standards of the Netherlands Normalization Institute, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Nocek, JE 1988. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 2051–2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offner, A, Bach, A and Sauvant, D 2003. Quantitative review of in situ starch degradation in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 106, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, ER and McDonald, I 1979. Estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to the rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellikaan, WH 2004. Passage of 13C-labelled feed components through the digestive tract of dairy cows. PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Robinson, P, Fadel, JG and Tamminga, S 1986. Evaluation of mathematical models to describe neutral detergent residue in terms of its susceptibility to degradation in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 15, 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannak, S, Südekum, KH and Susenbeth, A 2000. Estimating ruminal crude protein degradation with in situ and chemical fractionation procedures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 2009. User’s guide: statistics, version 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stensig, T, Weisbjerg, MR and Hvelplund, T 1994. Estimation of ruminal digestibility of NDF from in sacco degradation and rumen fractional outflow rate. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science 44, 96–109.Google Scholar
Thomas, C 2004. Feed into milk: a new applied feeding system for dairy cows. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Van Duinkerken, G, Blok, MC, Bannink, A, Cone, JW, Dijkstra, J, Van Vuuren, AM and Tamminga, S 2011. Update of the Dutch protein evaluation system for ruminants: the DVE/OEB2010 system. The Journal of Agricultural Science 149, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanzant, ES, Cochran, RC and Titgemeyer, EC 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2717–2729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, G and Hoover, W 1983. Rate and extent of neutral detergent fiber degradation of feedstuffs in situ . Journal of Dairy Science 66, 2109–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, H (ed.) 2011. NorFor – the Nordic feed evaluation system. EAAP Publication No. 130. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 167pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Keyserlingk, MAG, Swift, ML, Puchala, R and Shelford, JA 1996. Degradability characteristics of dry matter and crude protein of forages in ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Supplementary material

Ali Supplementary Material S1

Download Supplementary material(File)
File 29.5 KB