Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Review: Applications and benefits of sexed semen in dairy and beef herds

  • S. A. Holden (a1) and S. T. Butler (a1)
Abstract

The use of sexed semen in dairy and beef cattle production provides a number of benefits at both farm and industry levels. There is an increasing demand for dairy and beef products across the globe, which will necessitate a greater focus on improving production efficiency. In dairy farming, there is surplus production of unwanted male calves. Male dairy calves increase the risk of dystocia compared with heifer calves, and as an unwanted by-product of breeding with conventional semen, they have a low economic value. Incorporating sexed semen into the breeding programme can minimise the number of unwanted male dairy calves and reduce dystocia. Sexed semen can be used to generate herd replacements and additional heifers for herd expansion at a faster rate from within the herd, thereby minimising biosecurity risks associated with bringing in animals from different herds. Furthermore, the use of sexed semen can increase herd genetic gain compared with use of non-sorted semen. In dairy herds, a sustainable breeding strategy could combine usage of sexed semen to generate replacements only, and usage of beef semen on all dams that are not suitable for generating replacements. This results in increased genetic gain in dairy herd, increased value of beef output from the dairy herd, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions from beef. It is important to note, however, that even a small decrease in fertility of sexed semen relative to conventional semen can negate much of the economic benefit. A high fertility sexed semen product has the potential to accelerate herd expansion, minimise waste production, improve animal welfare and increase profitability compared with non-sorted conventional semen.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: stephen.butler@teagasc.ie
References
Hide All
Alexandratos, N and Bruinsma, J 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision, ESA Working paper 12 (3). FAO, Rome.
Archbold, H, Shalloo, L, Kennedy, E, Pierce, K and Buckley, F 2012. Influence of age, body weight and body condition score before mating start date on the pubertal rate of maiden Holstein–Friesian heifers and implications for subsequent cow performance and profitability. Animal 6, 11431151.
Berry, D and Cromie, A 2007. Artificial insemination increases the probability of a male calf in dairy and beef cattle. Theriogenology 67, 346352.
Blondin, P 2017. Logistics of large scale commercial IVF embryo production. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 29, 3236.
Borchersen, S and Peacock, M 2009. Danish A.I. field data with sexed semen. Theriogenology 71, 5963.
Bouwman, A, Van der Hoek, K, Eickhout, B and Soenario, I 2005. Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agricultural Systems 84, 121153.
Buckley, F, Lopez-Villalobos, N and Heins, B 2014. Crossbreeding: implications for dairy cow fertility and survival. Animal 8, 122133.
Butler, ST, Hutchinson, IA and Cromie, AR 2014a. Preliminary results from a field trial to evaluate sexed semen in dairy cows and heifers. Agricultural Research Forum. Lynn Printers, Tullamore, Ireland, p. 115.
Butler, ST, Hutchinson, IA, Cromie, AR and Shalloo, L 2014b. Applications and cost benefits of sexed semen in pasture-based dairy production systems. Animal 8, 165172.
Calus, M, Bijma, P and Veerkamp, R 2015. Evaluation of genomic selection for replacement strategies using selection index theory. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 64996509.
Crosson, P 2008. The impact of cow genotype on the profitability of grassland-based beef production in Ireland. Biodiversity and animal feed: future challenges for grassland production. Proceedings of the 22nd General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Uppsala, Sweden, 9 to 12 June 2008. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, pp. 771–773.
De Haas, Y, Windig, J, Calus, M, Dijkstra, J, De Haan, M, Bannink, A and Veerkamp, R 2011. Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 61226134.
DeJarnette, JM, Leach, MA, Nebel, RL, Marshall, CE, McCleary, CR and Moreno, JF 2011. Effects of sex-sorting and sperm dosage on conception rates of Holstein heifers: is comparable fertility of sex-sorted and conventional semen plausible? Journal of Dairy Science 94, 34773483.
DeJarnette, JM, Nebel, RL and Marshall, CE 2009. Evaluating the success of sex-sorted semen in US dairy herds from on farm records. Theriogenology 71, 4958.
Dematawena, C and Berger, P 1997. Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility, and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for Holsteins1. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 754761.
De Vries, A, Overton, M, Fetrow, J, Leslie, K, Eicker, S and Rogers, G 2008. Exploring the impact of sexed semen on the structure of the dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 847856.
Dillon, P, Crosse, S, Stakelum, G and Flynn, F 1995. The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring‐calving dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 50, 286299.
Faust, MA, Betthauser, J, Storch, A and Crego, S 2016. Effects for fertility of processing steps of a new technology platform for producing sexed sperm. Journal of Animal Science 94 (suppl. 5), 544544.
Frijters, AC, Mullaart, E, Roelofs, RM, Van Hoorne, RP, Moreno, JF, Moreno, O and Merton, JS 2009. What affects fertility of sexed bull semen more, low sperm dosage or the sorting process? Theriogenology 71, 6467.
Garner, DL, Evans, KM and Seidel, GE 2013. Sex-sorting sperm using flow cytometry/cell sorting. In Spermatogenesis, pp. 279–295. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA.
Gerber, P, Vellinga, T, Opio, C and Steinfeld, H 2011. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science 139, 100108.
Hayakawa, H, Hirai, T, Takimoto, A, Ideta, A and Aoyagi, Y 2009. Superovulation and embryo transfer in Holstein cattle using sexed sperm. Theriogenology 71, 6873.
Healy, AA, House, JK and Thomson, PC 2013. Artificial insemination field data on the use of sexed and conventional semen in nulliparous Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 19051914.
Hegarty, R, Goopy, J, Herd, R and McCorkell, B 2007. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. Journal of Animal Science 85, 14791486.
Herd, R, Arthur, P, Hegarty, R and Archer, J 2002. Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from beef production by selection for reduced residual feed intake. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Session 10, Communication (No. 10-22). August, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), 19–23 August, Montpellier, France.
Hinde, K, Carpenter, AJ, Clay, JS and Bradford, BJ 2014. Holsteins favor heifers, not bulls: biased milk production programmed during pregnancy as a function of fetal sex. PLoS One 9, e86169.
Hohenboken, WD 1999. Applications of sexed semen in cattle production. Theriogenology 52, 14211433.
Hötzel, MJ, Longo, C, Balcão, LF, Cardoso, CS and Costa, JHC 2014. A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in Southern Brazil. PLoS One 9, e114995.
Hutchinson, I, Shalloo, L and Butler, S 2013. Expanding the dairy herd in pasture-based systems: the role of sexed semen use in virgin heifers and lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 67426752.
Johnson, LA 1995. Sex preselection by flow cytometric separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm based on DNA difference: a review. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 7, 893903.
Lesschen, J, Van den Berg, M, Westhoek, H, Witzke, H and Oenema, O 2011. Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166, 1628.
Matoba, S, Yoshioka, H, Matsuda, H, Sugimura, S, Aikawa, Y, Ohtake, M, Hashiyada, Y, Seta, T, Nakagawa, K and Lonergan, P 2014. Optimizing production of in vivo-matured oocytes from superstimulated Holstein cows for in vitro production of embryos using X-sorted sperm. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 743753.
McCullock, K, Hoag, DL, Parsons, J, Lacy, M, Seidel, GE and Wailes, W 2013. Factors affecting economics of using sexed semen in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 63666377.
Morotti, F, Sanches, B, Pontes, J, Basso, A, Siqueira, E, Lisboa, L and Seneda, M 2014. Pregnancy rate and birth rate of calves from a large-scale IVF program using reverse-sorted semen in Bos indicus, Bos indicus-taurus, and Bos taurus cattle. Theriogenology 81, 696701.
Murphy, C, Shalloo, L, Hutchinson, I and Butler, ST 2016. Expanding the dairy herd in pasture-based systems: the role of sexed semen within alternative breeding strategies. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 66806692.
Norman, HD, Wright, JR and Miller, RH 2010. Response to alternative genetic-economic indices for Holsteins across 2 generations. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 26952702.
Place, S and Mitloehner, F 2010. A review of the dairy industry’s role in climate change and air quality and the potential of mitigation through improved production efficiency. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 34073416.
Prendiville, R, Pierce, KM and Buckley, F 2010. A comparison between Holstein-Friesian and Jersey dairy cows and their F1 cross with regard to milk yield, somatic cell score, mastitis, and milking characteristics under grazing conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 27412750.
Roer, AG, Johansen, A, Bakken, AK, Daugstad, K, Fystro, G and Strømman, AH 2013. Environmental impacts of combined milk and meat production in Norway according to a life cycle assessment with expanded system boundaries. Livestock Science 155, 384396.
Seidel, G 2003. Economics of selecting for sex: the most important genetic trait. Theriogenology 59, 585598.
Seidel, GE Jr and Schenk, JL 2008. Pregnancy rates in cattle with cryopreserved sexed sperm: effects of sperm numbers per inseminate and site of sperm deposition. Animal Reproductive Science 105, 129138.
Seidel, GE Jr 2014. Update on sexed semen technology in cattle. Animal 8, 160164.
Shalloo, L, Cromie, A and McHugh, N 2014. Effect of fertility on the economics of pasture-based dairy systems. Animal 8 (suppl. 1), 222231.
Shalloo, L, Dillon, P, Rath, M and Wallace, M 2004. Description and validation of the Moorepark dairy system model. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 19451959.
Stroud, B 2012. IETS 2012 statistics and data retrieval committee report. Embryo Transfer Newsletter 30, 1526.
Taylor, SC, Moore, A, Thiessen, R and Bailey, C 1985. Efficiency of food utilization in traditional and sex-controlled systems of beef production. Animal Science 40, 401440.
Vishwanath, R and Moreno, J 2018. Semen sexing: current state of the art with emphasis on bovines. Animal: 1–12, https://doi.org//10.1017/S1751731118000496, 19 March 2018.
Weigel, K 2004. Exploring the role of sexed semen in dairy production systems. Journal of Dairy Science 87, E120E130.
Wilcox, CJ, Webb, DW and DeLorenza, MA 1992. Genetic improvement of dairy cattle. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Xu, Z 2014. Application of liquid semen technology improves conception rate of sex-sorted semen in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7298.
Xu, Z, Johnson, D and Burton, L 2000. Factors affecting the sex ratio in dairy cattle in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 60, 301302.
Yan, T, Mayne, C, Gordon, F, Porter, M, Agnew, R, Patterson, D, Ferris, C and Kilpatrick, D 2010. Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 26302638.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed