Anguelova, M, Karlsson, J and Jirstrand, M
2012. Minimal output sets for identifiability. Mathematical Biosciences
239, 139–153.
Baldwin, RL
2000. Introduction: history and future of modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals. In Modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals (ed. JP McNamara, France, J. and Beever, DE), pp. 1–9. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Baldwin, RL, Thornley, JH and Beever, DE
1987. Metabolism of the lactating cow. II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model. Journal of Dairy Research.
54, 107–131.
Balsa-Canto, E and Banga, JR
2011. AMIGO, a toolbox for advanced model identification in systems biology using global optimization. Bioinformatics
27, 2311–2313.
Baranyi, J, Ross, T, McMeekin, TA and Roberts, TA
1996. Effects of parameterization on the performance of empirical models used in ‘predictive microbiology’. Food Microbiology
13, 83–91.
Barnes, CJ
1995. The art of catchment modeling – what is a good model. Environment International
21, 747–751.
Bellman, R and Astrom, KJ
1970. On structural identifiability. Mathematical Biosciences
7, 329–339.
Bellu, G, Saccomani, MP, Audoly, S and D’Angio, L
2007. DAISY: a new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
88, 52–61.
Boer, HM, Butler, ST, Stotzel, C, Te Pas, MF, Veerkamp, RF and Woelders, H
2017. Validation of a mathematical model of the bovine estrous cycle for cows with different estrous cycle characteristics. Animal
11, 1991–2001.
Boston, RC, Wilkins, P and Tedeschi, LO
2007. Identifiability and accuracy: two critical problems associated with the application of models in nutrition and the health sciences. In Mathematical modeling for nutrition and health sciences (ed. M Hanigan), pp. 161–193. University of Pennsylvania, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Braems, L, Jaulin, L, Kieffer, M and Walter, E
2001. Guaranteed numerical alternatives to structural identifiability testing. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Volumes 1–5, pp. 3122–3127.
Carson, ER, Cobelli, C and Finkelstein, L
1983. The mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems: model formulation, identification, and validation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
Cedersund, G
2012. Conclusions via unique predictions obtained despite unidentifiability – new definitions and a general method. FEBS Journal
279, 3513–3527.
Chis, O, Banga, JR and Balsa-Canto, E
2011a. GenSSI: a software toolbox for structural identifiability analysis of biological models. Bioinformatics
27, 2610–2611.
Chis, OT, Banga, JR and Balsa-Canto, E
2011b. Structural identifiability of systems biology models: a critical comparison of methods. PLoS One, 6, e27755.
Chis, O-T, Villaverde, AF, Banga, JR and Balsa-Canto, E
2016. On the relationship between sloppiness and identifiability. Mathematical Biosciences
282, 141–161.
Dijkstra, J, France, J, Dhanoa, MS, Maas, JA, Hanigan, MD, Rook, AJ and Beever, DE
1997. A model to describe growth patterns of the mammary gland during pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Dairy Science
80, 2340–2354.
Doeschl-Wilson, AB
2011. The role of mathematical models of host-pathogen interactions for livestock health and production – a review. Animal
5, 895–910.
France, J
1988. Mathematical-modeling in agricultural science. Weed Research
28, 419–423.
Friggens, NC, Brun-Lafleur, L, Faverdin, P, Sauvant, D and Martin, O
2013. Advances in predicting nutrient partitioning in the dairy cow: recognizing the central role of genotype and its expression through time. Animal
7, 89–101.
Friggens, NC, Emmans, GC and Veerkamp, RF
1999. On the use of simple ratios between lactation curve coefficients to describe parity effects on milk production. Livestock Production Science
62, 1–13.
Gutenkunst, RN, Waterfall, JJ, Casey, FP, Brown, KS, Myers, CR and Sethna, JP
2007. Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Computational Biology
3, 1871–1878.
Hanigan, MD, Rius, AG, Kolver, ES and Palliser, CC
2007. A redefinition of the representation of mammary cells and enzyme activities in a lactating dairy cow model. Journal of Dairy Science
90, 3816–3830.
Karlsson, J, Anguelova, M and Jirstrand, M
2012. An efficient method for structural identifiability analysis of large dynamic systems. In 16th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, pp. 941–946.
Khalil, HK
2000. Nonlinear systems. Pearson Education International Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Locke, JCW, Millar, AJ and Turner, MS
2005. Modelling genetic networks with noisy and varied experimental data: the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Theoretical Biology
234, 383–393.
Maiwald, T and Timmer, J
2008. Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with PottersWheel. Bioinformatics
24, 2037–2043.
Martin, O and Sauvant, D
2010. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 1. Trajectories of life function priorities and genetic scaling. Animal
4, 2030–2047.
Mills, JA, Dijkstra, J, Bannink, A, Cammell, SB, Kebreab, E and France, J
2001. A mechanistic model of whole-tract digestion and methanogenesis in the lactating dairy cow: model development, evaluation, and application. Journal of Animal Science
79, 1584–1597.
Moate, PJ, Boston, RC, Jenkins, TC and Lean, IJ
2008. Kinetics of ruminal lipolysis of triacylglycerol and biohydrogenation of long-chain fatty acids: new insights from old data. Journal of Dairy Science
91, 731–742.
Muñoz-Tamayo, R, Giger-Reverdin, S and Sauvant, D
2016. Mechanistic modelling of in vitro fermentation by rumen microbiota. Animal Feed Science and Technology.
220, 1–21.
Muñoz-Tamayo, R, Laroche, B, Leclerc, M and Walter, E
2009. IDEAS: a parameter identification toolbox with symbolic analysis of uncertainty and its application to biological modelling. In Preprints of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint-Malo, France, pp. 1271-1276.
Muñoz-Tamayo, R, Martinon, P, Bougaran, G, Mairet, F and Bernard, O
2014. Getting the most out of it: optimal experiments for parameter estimation of microalgae growth models. Journal of Process Control
24, 991–1001.
Puillet, L, Martin, O, Tichit, M and Sauvant, D
2008. Simple representation of physiological regulations in a model of lactating female: application to the dairy goat. Animal
2, 235–246.
Raue, A, Karlsson, J, Saccomani, MP, Jirstrand, M and Timmer, J
2014. Comparison of approaches for parameter identifiability analysis of biological systems. Bioinformatics
30, 1440–1448.
Raue, A, Kreutz, C, Maiwald, T, Bachmann, J, Schilling, M, Klingmuller, U and Timmer, J
2009. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics
25, 1923–1929.
Roper, RT, Saccomani, MP and Vicini, P
2010. Cellular signaling identifiability analysis: a case study. Journal of Theoretical Biology
264, 528–537.
Saccomani, MP, Audoly, S and D’Angio, L
2003. Parameter identifiability of nonlinear systems: the role of initial conditions. Automatica
39, 619–632.
Sauvant, D
1994. Modeling homeostatic and homeorhetic regulations in lactating animals. Livestock Production Science
39, 105–113.
Schaber, J and Klipp, E
2011. Model-based inference of biochemical parameters and dynamic properties of microbial signal transduction networks. Current Opinion in Biotechnology
22, 109–116.
Spedding, CRW
1988. General aspects of modelling and its application in livestock production. In Modelling of livestock production systems (ed. S Korver and JAM Van Arendonk), pp. 3–13. Kluwer Academica Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Tedeschi, LO
2006. Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems
89, 225–247.
Vargas-Villamil, LM and Tedeschi, LO
2014. Potential integration of multi-fitting, inverse problem and mechanistic modelling approaches to applied research in animal science: a review. Animal Production Science
54, 1905–1913.
Villaverde, AF and Barreiro, A
2016. Identifiability of large nonlinear biochemical networks. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry
76, 259–296.
Villaverde, AF, Barreiro, A and Papachristodoulou, A
2016. Structural identifiability of dynamic systems biology models. PLoS Computational Biology
12, e1005153.
Walter, E and Pronzato, L
1996. On the identifiability and distinguishability of nonlinear parametric models. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
42, 125–134.
Walter, E and Pronzato, L
1997. Identification of parametric models from experimental data. Springer, London.
White, LJ, Evans, ND, Lam, TJGM, Schukken, YH, Medley, GF, Godfrey, KR and Chappell, MJ
2002. The structural identifiability and parameter estimation of a multispecies model for the transmission of mastitis in dairy cows with postmilking teat disinfection. Mathematical Biosciences
180, 275–291.
Wood, PDP
1967. Algebraic model of lactation curve in cattle. Nature
216, 164–165.
Wu, XL, Heringstad, B and Gianola, D
2010. Bayesian structural equation models for inferring relationships between phenotypes: a review of methodology, identifiability, and applications. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
127, 3–15.
