Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming

  • B. K. Boogaard (a1), S. J. Oosting (a2), B. B. Bock (a1) and J. S. C. Wiskerke (a1)
Abstract

Over the past 50 years, the scale and intensity of livestock farming have increased significantly. At the same time, Western societies have become more urbanised and fewer people have close relatives involved in farming. As a result, most citizens have little knowledge or direct experience of what farming entails. In addition, more people are expressing concerns over issues such as farm animal welfare. This has led to increasing public demand for more sustainable ways of livestock farming. To date, little research has been carried out on the social pillar of sustainable livestock farming. The aim of this study is to provide insights into the sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming systems. This study reviews the key findings of earlier published interdisciplinary research about the social perceptions of dairy farming in the Netherlands and Norway (Boogaard et al., 2006, 2008, 2010a and 2010b) and synthesises the implications for sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming. This study argues that the (sociocultural) sustainable development of livestock farming is not an objective concept, but that it is socially and culturally constructed by people in specific contexts. It explains the social pillar of the economics/ecological/social model sustainability in terms of the fields of tensions that exist between modernity, traditions and naturality – ‘the MTN knot’ – each of which has positive and negative faces. All three angles of vision can be seen in people's attitudes to dairy farming, but the weight given to each differs between individuals and cultures. Hence, sociocultural sustainability is context dependent and needs to be evaluated according to its local meaning. Moreover, sociocultural sustainability is about people's perceptions of livestock farming. Lay people might perceive livestock farming differently and ascribe different meanings to it than experts do, but their ‘reality’ is just as real. Finally, this study calls for an ongoing collaboration between social and animal scientists in order to develop livestock farming systems that are more socioculturally sustainable.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: Birgit.boogaard@wur.nl
References
Hide All
Aarts MNC, Van Woerkum CMJ 1994. Wat heet natuur? De communicatie tussen overheid en boeren over natuur en natuurbeleid. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Aarts MNC, Van Woerkum CMJ 2006. Frame construction in interaction, 112th MOPAN international conference. Short Run Press, Exeter, Pontypridd, UK.
Aarts MNC, Te Velde H, Woerkum CMJ 2001. Eten, maar niet willen weten. In Hoe oordelen we over de veehouderij? (ed. MNC Aarts and C Hanning), pp. 21114. Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Assefa G, Frostell B 2007. Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society 29, 6378.
Berger PL, Luckmann T 1967. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor, New York, USA.
Bieleman J 1998. Boeren met machines. Het melkveehouderijbedrijf. In Techniek in Nederland in de twintigste eeuw (ed. JW Schot and AAA De la Bruhèze), pp. 99126. Stichting Historie der Techniek, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Boogaard BK, Oosting SJ, Bock BB 2006. Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in the Netherlands. Livestock Science 104, 1322.
Boogaard BK, Oosting SJ, Bock BB 2008. Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livestock Science 117, 2433.
Boogaard BK, Bock BB, Oosting SJ, Krogh E 2010a. Visiting a farm: an exploratory study on the social construction of animal farming in Norway and the Netherlands based on sensory perception. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 17, 2450.
Boogaard BK, Bock BB, Oosting SJ, Wiskerke JSC, Van der Zijpp AJ 2010b. Social acceptance of dairy farming: the ambivalence between the two faces of modernity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9256-4.
Brown BJ, Hanson ME, Liverman DM, Meredeth RW Jr 1987. Global sustainability: toward definition. Environmental Management 11, 713719.
Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y 2009. Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy. The MIT Press, London, UK.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) 2009a. CBS, Statistics Netherlands. Statline: Landbouwtelling; gemeente 1980–2000.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) 2009b. CBS, Statistics Netherlands. StatLine: Landbouw; bedrijfstype nationaal.
Cloke P 2003. Country visions. Pearson, Harlow, UK.
Cohen NE 2010. Considering animals: moral convictions concerning animals and judgement on the culling of healthy animals in animal disease epidemics. PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Cornelissen AMG 2003. Two faces of sustainability: Fuzzy evaluation of sustainable development. PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Dagevos H, Sterrenberg L 2003. Burgers en consumenten: tussen tweedeling en twee-eenheid. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dahlberg KA 1988. Ethical and value issues in international agricultural research. Agriculture and Human Values 5, 101111.
Dubois JL, Mahieu FR, Poussard A 2002. Social sustainability as a component of human development. Workshop: poverty, social capital and development. Von Hugel Institute, St. Edmunds’ College, Cambridge University, UK.
European Commission 2005. Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer 229. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Fauconnier G, Van Woerkum CMJ, Marck P 1992. Beeldvorming over de landbouw. CLEO, Heverlee, Belgium.
Fraser D 2001. The “new perception” of animal agriculture: legless cows, featherless chickens, and a need for genuine analysis. Journal of Animal Science 79, 634641.
Frerichs R, De Wijs J 2002. Opvattingen en meningen over het Nederlandse platteland. The Dutch Institute for Public Opinion, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fresco LO, Kroonenberg SB 1992. Time and spatial scales in ecological sustainability. Land Use Policy 9, 155168.
Frewer LJ, Kole A, Van de Kroon SM, De Lauwere C 2005. Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18, 345367.
Frouws J 1998. The contested redefinition of the countryside. An analysis of rural discourses in the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 38, 2168.
Frouws J, Leroy P 2003. Boeren, burgers en buitenlui: over nieuwe coalities en sturingsvormen in het landelijk gebied. Tijdschrift voor sociaalwetenschappelijk onderzoek van de landbouw 18, 90102.
Giddings B, Hopwood B, O'Brien G 2002. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development 10, 187196.
Greider T, Garkovich L 1994. Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology 59, 124.
Hansen JW 1996. Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems 50, 117143.
Harrington L 1995. Sustainability in perspective: strengths and limitations of farming systems research in contributing to a sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 5, 4159.
Hessing-Couvret E, Reuling A 2002. Het WIN-model™. Waardensegmenten in Nederland. The Dutch Institute for Public Opinion, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hodges J 2003. Editorial: science, scientists and values. Livestock Production Science 82, 259264.
Hodges J 2006. Culture, values and ethics of animal scientists. Livestock Science 103, 263269.
Hofstede G 1980. Culture's consequence: international differences in work-related values. Sage Publications, Beverly, CA, USA.
Holloway L 2004. Showing and telling farming: agricultural shows and re-imaging British agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 20, 319330.
Inglehart R 1977. Silent revolution: changes values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jones O 1995. Lay discourses of the rural: developments and implications for rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies 11, 3549.
Kanis E, Groen AF, De Greef KH 2003. Societal concerns about pork and pork production and their relationships to the production system. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 137162.
Klostermann JEM, Cramer J 2007. Social construction of sustainability in water companies in the Dutch coastal zone. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 15731584.
LEI 2007. Farm accountancy data network. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from http://www.lei.wur.nl/UK/statistics/Binternet/
Mak G 1996. Hoe God verdween uit Jorwerd. Atlas, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
McGlone JJ 2001. Farm animal welfare in the context of other society issues: toward sustainable systems. Livestock Production Science 72, 7581.
McKenzie S 2004. Social sustainability: towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia, Magill, South Australia.
Mollenhorst H 2005. How to house a hen: assessing sustainable development of egg production systems. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Redclift M, Woodgate G 1997. Sustainability and social construction. In The international handbook of environmental sociology (ed. M Redclift and G Woodgate), pp. 5570. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Rigby D, Woodhouse P, Young T, Burton M 2001. Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecological Economics 39, 463478.
Roe EM 1996. Sustainable development and cultural theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 3, 114.
Rokeach M 1973. Nature of human values. Free Press, New York, NY, USA.
Russell D 1995. Theory and practice in sustainability and sustainable development. Research and Reference Services Project, U.S. Agency for International Development Center for Development Information and Evaluation, Washington, DC, USA.
Rye JF 2006. Rural youths’ images of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies 22, 409421.
Shearman R 1990. The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environmental Management 14, 18.
Sumner J 2005. Value wars in the new periphery: sustainability, rural communities and agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 303312.
Termeer CAM, Koppenjan JFM 1997. Managing perceptions in networks. In Managing complex networks: strategies for the public sector (ed. WJM Kickert, EH Klijn and JFM Koppenjan), pp. 7997. Sage, London, UK.
Thomassen MA 2008. Environmental impact of dairy cattle production systems: an integral assessment. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Thompson PB 2006. Ethical bases of sustainability. Conference paper presented at the Meeting of European Association for Animal Production, Antalya, Turkey.
Van Calker KJ 2005. Sustainability of Dutch Dairy Farming Systems: a modelling approach. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Van Dam F, Heins S, Elbersen BS 2002. Lay discourses of the rural and stated and revealed preferences for rural living. Some evidence of the existence of a rural idyll in the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies 18, 461476.
Van der Ziel T 2003. Verzet en verlangen. De constructie van nieuwe ruraliteiten rond de MKZ-crisis en de trek naar het platteland. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Van der Ziel T, Steenbekkers A 2006. Leven zonder drukte: Wat stedelingen waarderen in het platteland. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Van Eijk AM 1998. Farming systems research and spirituality: an analysis of the foundations of professionalism in developing sustainable farming systems. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Weatherell C, Tregear A, Allinson J 2003. In search of the concerned consumer: UK public perceptions of food, farming and buying local. Journal of Rural Studies 19, 233244.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 112 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 174 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.