Introduction

The aim of the RADIX (Rapid Access Drilling and Ice eXtraction) project is to design and construct fast-access ice-drilling equipment for prospecting a potential drilling site in Antarctica in the framework of the International Partnership for Ice Core Sciences (IPICS) ‘Oldest Ice Project’ (http://www.pages.unibe.ch/ipics/white-papers). The goal of this project is to drill an ice core providing a continuous undisturbed climate record over the past 1.5 × 10⁶ years. The search for an optimal drilling site includes standard procedures such as airborne radar surveys and glaciological modelling (Reference FischerFischer and others, 2013). For the first time, these pre-investigations will also be supplemented by fast-access drillings, which should increase the probability of the scientific success of the deep drilling project. The need for fast-access drilling is clearly indicated by the experience from past deep ice-core drilling projects, where folded ice and disturbed chronological sequences were encountered near the base of the ice sheet. This folding can comprise up to 10% of the ice-sheet thickness.

A fast-access system should ideally exceed the drilling speed of a large coring project by at least an order of magnitude, which would enable the survey of several sites in one season. This requires an optimization of the size and set-up of the equipment and a minimization of the hole size in order to reduce weight, drill fluid consumption and to save time for moving the equipment to the next site.

The type of prospective drilling depends largely on the scientific goals. The range is from boring an access hole to carry out measurements in the borehole, to retrieving ice cores from specific depths or from the full length. It could include logging-while-drilling instruments. Our aim is to develop a system using minimal resources and logistics support. In order to keep the total weight low, while attempting a reasonable drilling speed, we focus on a very small hole diameter and refrain from collecting cores, although drilling of short core sections could be a practicable option. For our RADIX project we decided to use a miniaturized version of a coiled tubing drilling system (Reference Clow and KociClow and Koci, 2002). The advantage of this technique is the simplicity of the components and the use of a hydraulic motor providing high torque at small diameters.

Design work on RADIX started in summer 2012. After the prototyping phase, the final goal will be to drill several holes at potential deep drilling sites down to or near to bedrock. The holes will be used for temperature and other downhole measurements. The drilled ice chips and/or core samples from specific depths will be analyzed, with the main goal to determine the age of the ice near the bottom and to assure the integrity of the ice-core record.

Drilling Approach

Our design is based on the established technique of coiled tubing drilling (Reference Clow and KociClow and Koci, 2002) in forward flow mode. A downhole hydraulic motor is powered by high-pressure fluid in the coiled tubing/hose, and cuttings are flushed to the surface along the space between the hole wall and the tubing/hose. The goal is to optimize the system for low weight and speed of penetration. The drilling fluid also serves to maintain a balanced hydrostatic pressure in the hole. The fluid represents a significant part of the total weight and cost of a drilling (Fig. 1). Therefore we set minimizing the hole size as a major constraint of the design. Hole size, hydraulic hose dimensions, hydraulic pressures, power for drilling, drilling speed, etc., are closely interrelated. We first determine some constraints.

Fig. 1. Drilling fluid demand for a 3000m hole based on density 930 kg m^–3 (without losses).

The remaining parameters of the hydraulic system are constrained by the physical laws. Variables used in the derivations below are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Hydraulic system parameters used to determine the minimal drillhole diameter. Pressures are relative to the hydrostatic pressure

The output power P of the motor is given by

(1)

Tests with a prototype motor have shown that we can expect a motor efficiency γ of ∼30%.

From deep drilling operations we estimate that ∼10MJ of energy are used to produce 1 m³ of cuttings (Reference Gundestrup, Steffensen and SchwanderGundestrup and others, 1994). This energy includes the energy for cutting the ice and the energy for the transport of the ice chips and frictional losses. As we will produce finer cuttings than with a regular core drill, we use here a conservative value of 20 MJ m^–3 for the specific cutting energy E.

The required motor power P is therefore

(2)

The pressure loss in the hose is given by

(3)

The laminar flow assumption used here is justified by the resulting Reynolds numbers. The pressure loss in the annulus depends on the position of the hose relative to the centre of the hole. The flow is easier in an eccentric annulus (Reference Piercy, Hooper and WinnyPiercy and others, 1933). As we expect that the hole will not be exactly vertical but will have an inclination of a few degrees, we can safely assume that the hose will generally be in a full eccentric position. The enhancement factor compared to concentric flow depends slightly on the hole/hose diameter ratio, but is ∼2.2 for the range of practical diameters. We further assume that the effective viscosity of the fluid with cuttings is 35% higher than that of the pure fluid (Reference ThomasThomas, 1965).

According to Reference Piercy, Hooper and WinnyPiercy and others (1933), the pressure loss in the annulus between d _o and d _h is given by

(4)

where

(5)

is the ratio between the volume flow rates of newly drilled ice and recirculated fluid.

This set of equations describes the characteristics of the system with two free parameters. Figure 2 shows the numerical solution of the required pump pressure as a function of hole diameter for three different tubing wall thicknesses.

Fig. 2. Numerical solution of Eqns (4) and (5) for tubing wall thickness of 1, 2 and 3 mm. In the red shaded area the required pump pressure exceeds the specified maximum of 20MPa.

This theoretical basis shows the practical lower limit of the diameter that can potentially be realized by a coiled tubing drill to a depth of 3000 m. The 1 mm wall thickness corresponds to a reasonable dimension of steel tubing, while the 3 mm wall thickness is typical for a plastic hydraulic pressure hose. With a 7 mm outer diameter (o.d.) steel tubing one could drill a hole as small as 14 mm. The weight of the tubing in the fluid would be ∼3500N, requiring a sophisticated tubing guide and injectors. The lower limit when using a plastic hydraulic hose with a 3 mm wall is ∼20mm. A metal-free hydraulic hose can be manufactured with a specific weight very close to that of ice, making it nearly weightless when immersed in a fluid matching the ice density. The main disadvantage of the plastic hose is its larger elasticity compared to steel, making penetration control more difficult. Nevertheless, in order to minimize size, complexity and weight, we have decided to pursue only the metal-free hydraulic hose version.

Aiming at a 20 mm hole and a hose with 3 mm wall thickness we obtain the following values for the remaining system parameters:

1. Flow rate J = 31.5 mL s⁻¹

2. Fluid pressure at surface p _s = 17.3 MPa

3. Hose inner/outer diameter d _i/d _o = 6.35/12.35 mm

4. Motor power P = 63 W

5. Pressure drop at motor p _m = 5.7 MPa

Drilling Components

To engineer such a targeted miniature coiled tubing drill, the following major components need to be evaluated/designed (Fig. 3):

1. 1. Micro hydraulic motor fitting into a 20 mm hole

2. 2. Hydraulic hose

3. 3. High-pressure pump

4. 4. Spooling and feeding system for the hose

5. 5. Drilling fluid

6. 6. Chips/fluid separation and fluid recycling system

7. 7. Firn casing and drilling system through the firn layer

Here we discuss the fundamental parts of the drill and some aspects of their design.

Fig. 3. Principal components of the rapid-access drilling system.

Hydraulic motor and drill bit

We are not aware of a commercial drive unit with a diameter in the order of 15 mm. The smallest mud motors on the market have a diameter of 43 mm. We have decided to design a tailored micro-motor based on the Moineau design (progressive cavity motors (Reference MoineauMoineau, 1931)) offering a very slim, robust and mechanically simple device (Fig. 4). Most Moineau motors use a stator made of rubber. The very low temperatures and the use of a yet unknown, potentially aggressive drilling fluid make the use of elastomers unfeasible. Therefore a full metal design is preferred. The geometry of stator and rotor is rather complex and requires high machining quality (in the order of 0.01 mm) in order to keep the leak rate of the low-viscosity hydraulic fluid in a tolerable range. Conventional machining (milling, micro-spark erosion) is rather costly, especially in the prototyping phase when several versions may be required to optimize the design. The small size of the motor and the complex geometry are an ideal application for three-dimensional (3-D) metal printing (Fig. 5; Ecoparts, Switzerland). However, the surface roughness of the laser sintered parts (∼20μm) is not sufficient. By carefully adjusting the dimensions of rotor and stator they can be ground against each other using a 20 μm grain-size finishing compound, resulting in a satisfactory leak rate for the viscosity range of potential fluids. We have run a first prototype motor for 7 hours using water as a fluid (viscosity ∼1 mPas) at a load of ∼30W. The performance was close to expectation. The leak rate was ∼50% and the overall efficiency ∼20%. The leak rate increased by ∼40% during the test. These values will be better when using higher-viscosity fluids. Also the leak rate was not optimal because of a not yet optimized dimensioning of rotor and stator. In addition, the surfaces of those parts will be nitrided in order to reduce wear.

Fig. 4. Drill assembly.

Fig. 5. 15 mm diameter progressive cavity displacement rotary drive unit. The bodies except threads have been manufactured by 3-D direct metal laser sintering.

Specifications of the motor:

1. Type: Progressive cavity displacement, 3–4 lobe

2. Geometry: 15 mm diameter, 60 mm length, volume displacement 2.1 cm³ rev⁻¹

3. Nominal speed: 15rps

As drill bit we use a modified 20 mm carbide-tipped cylindrical wood boring bit (Oertli, Switzerland) with hard metal cutters. Supplemented bores allow fluid to flow to the cutters. Limiting bolts between the cutters have been added to control the pitch (nominal 0.6 mm). To make the bit more aggressive the function of the ‘pre-cutters’ has been reduced to a guide element by grinding them back behind the main cutters. We plan for zero or slightly negative weight on the bit to facilitate vertical penetration.

Although the hose is strong enough to take the torque, a small anti-torque section on top of the drill reduces twisting of the hose. The verticality of the hole is controlled passively by gravity. An extension tube can be introduced between anti-torque section and drill to make verticality changes slower and to add some weight to the end of the hose to compensate for the drag that the upward-moving fluid exerts on the hose.

Recycling of the drilling fluid

With a mixing ratio between cuttings and fluid of 1 : 10, the drilling fluid is cycled about ten times through the hole. We will collect the chips for scientific purposes (e.g. age determination) trying to keep an essentially undisturbed sequence. For this purpose we plan to stop the penetration every 100 m while keeping the fluid flowing in order to create some spacing between successive chips packets. A prerequisite for this approach is that the buoyancy-driven sedimentation speed of the chips is much smaller than the flow speed in the annulus. Assuming a chips size of <0.5mm in diameter and a density mismatch between fluid and ice of <10 kg m^–3, the sedimentation speed is expected to be more than two orders of magnitude smaller than the flow speed of the drilling fluid. A spacing distance between packets corresponding to a few per cent of the actual drilling depth should therefore be sufficient. We must evidently accept some mixing of the chips due to the velocity distribution arising from differential sedimentation and fluid flow speeds, and differences in friction between chips and hole wall. In order to keep a good sequence we also need to use a continuous separator for the chips. First tests with an extruder press look promising (Fig. 6). We will evaluate the possibility of removing the fluid from the hole and reusing it for several drillings.

Fig. 6. Ice pellets extruded from ice/silicone oil slurry with a hand crank seed oil press have a residual oil content of ∼2%.

Use of the Access Hole and Collected Cuttings

The cuttings can be used for standard measurements such as water isotopic composition and trace component analysis (e.g. cosmogenic ¹⁰Be and ³⁶Cl), as long as these are not affected by the traces of drilling fluid, which in most cases can hardly be avoided. Gas measurements are obviously excluded because the cuttings are too small to retain undisturbed air samples. The size of the hole will accept small probes only. We think mainly of fiber-optic instruments, like distributed temperature sensing (DTS; Reference TylerTyler and others, 2013) or dust measurements by light scattering (Reference Bay, Price, Clow and GowBay and others, 2001). Technically a coring head could be used to retrieve bulk samples. However, the achievable core diameter would be barely more than 10 mm and the length rather limited. Rising and lowering of the drill would substantially extend the overall operation, so that such samples could only be taken from selected depths. The value of a coring option needs to be carefully evaluated against the increase in drilling time.

Field Test

A first test was made on the temperate Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland, in summer 2013. Here we used a small commercial 21 mm o.d. Moineau pump (Allweiler, Germany) as a motor, with a 30 mm modified cylindrical drill bit. A high-pressure cleaner (Kärcher, Germany) was used to drive the drill with surface water from the glacier. Flow rates and pressures were similar to those in the system described above. The test has demonstrated the feasibility of the system. The penetration rate was close to the planned 10 mms⁻¹. However, the depth reached during the test was limited to 3.5 m due to clumping preventing chips from rising in the annulus. This was not surprising, as wet ice clumps very easily. We anticipate much less sticking with cold chips well diluted in a hydrophobic fluid.

Conclusions

We have investigated the minimum practical hole dimension that can be drilled through polar ice sheets. The feasibility of drilling a rapid-access hole of only 20 mm diameter with a coiled tubing method through the polar ice sheet has been shown in theory and partly in practice. Although not all parts of the equipment exist in hardware yet, we estimate a total weight of ∼2 t for the system including fluid for one hole. About 2 kW of electrical power will be required for drilling. We do not expect that drilling itself and fluid handling at the surface will raise major problems. More challenging is the slurry transport from the drill up to the surface, which has not yet been tested in practice. Indeed, this transport represents probably the most delicate and uncertain aspect of the system. A test drilling to 300m is planned in Greenland. This should reveal whether the transport of cuttings in the annulus between hose and the hole wall is possible. Another issue that needs close attention is the loss of fluid by fracking of the ice due to overpressure in the hole. To be on the safe side it is advisable to keep the total pressure in the hole close to or slightly below the hydrostatic pressure, which requires a well-matched density and a low viscosity of the fluid.