Skip to main content

Critical Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics: A Methodological Review


The critical turn arrived in the field of applied linguistics in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and the field has since witnessed a burgeoning body of literature drawing on a variety of analytical frameworks and methodological approaches that are loosely labeled as critical discourse analysis (CDA). A methodological review of the role of CDA in the field is thus timely both to provide signposts for researchers wishing to draw on CDA methods in applied linguistics research and to provide some theoretical and methodological resources to evaluate the rapidly growing body of CDA-oriented applied linguistics research. Unlike some methodological tools, such as corpus analytic tools that can be inserted into a diverse range of theoretical frameworks (e.g., positivist studies, interpretive studies, critical studies), CDA cannot be applied divorced from its paradigmatic theories, as it is closely related to a specific set of social theories about the nature of language, literacy, identity, social practice, and the social world. CDA methods thus cannot be applied without also a concomitant commitment to CDA's theoretical orientations. In this review, the theoretical commitments as well as the classic methods of CDA will first be discussed and then the major areas in which CDA researchers typically conduct their studies are outlined together with a review of the variety of methodological approaches used in these different areas. The strengths as well as the limitations of these approaches will be discussed with examples of recent studies using CDA in the field of applied linguistics. The article will conclude with some suggestions for future directions of CDA methodological development.

Hide All

Bhatia V. K., Flowerdew J., & Jones R. H. (Eds.). (2008). Advances in discourse studies (pp. 233244). London, UK: Routledge.

This collection contains articles by Ron Scollon and Rodney Jones on how to use the notion of discourse itineraries to critically analyze the circulation of texts, practices, bodies, and objects and trace their evolving trajectories. It also contains other useful articles for CDA researchers including John Flowerdew's review article on CDA and Vijay Bhatia's article on critical genre analysis, among others, which can offer useful frameworks for CDA researchers.

Lin A. M. Y. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Overview. In Chapelle C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 14661471). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

This article provides an overview of the historical development of CDA and the major areas of work and contribution of CDA studies in applied linguistics.

Wodak R., & Meyer M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

This collection offers a comprehensive methodological introduction to the frameworks and methods used by key CDA researchers (Teun van Dijk, Ruth Wodak, and Norman Fairclough). It also contains chapters detailing corpus-based methods and multimodality analysis methods and how they can be fruitfully applied to CDA.

Agha A. (2007) Language and social relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Althusser L. (1984). Essays on ideology. London, UK: Verso.
Apple M. W. (1979). What correspondence theories of the hidden curriculum miss. The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 5, 101112.
Apple M. W. (2001). Comparing neoliberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37, 409423.
Baker P., Gabrielatos C., & McEnery T. (2013). Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslim” in the British Press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics, 34, 255278. doi:10.1093/applin/ams048
Block D. (2013). The structure and agency dilemma in identity and intercultural communication research. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13, 126147.
Block D., Gray J., & Holborow M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Blommaert J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert J., Collins J., & Slembrouck S. (2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication, 25, 197216.
Blommaert J., & Varis P. (2011). Enough is enough: The heuristics of authenticity in superdiversity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 2, 113.
Bourdieu P. (1984). Homo academicus. Paris, France: Minuit.
Bourdieu P. (1988). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Briscoe F. M., & De Oliver M. (2012). School leaders’ discursive constructions of low-income and minority families identities: A marketplace racism/classism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 9, 247280.
Canagarajah A. S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601626.
Canagarajah S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. In Li W. (Ed.), Applied Linguistics Review (pp. 128). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Canagarajah A. S. (Ed.). (2013a). Literacy as translingual practice: Between communities and classrooms. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Canagarajah A. S. (2013b). Translingual practice: Global English and cosmopolitan relations. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Cheng W. (2013). Corpus-based linguistic approaches to critical discourse analysis. In Chapelle C. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 13531360). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Chun C. (2010). Discourse itineraries in an EAP classroom: A collaborative critical literacy praxis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Creese A., & Blackledge A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94, 103115.
de los Heros S. (2009). Linguistic pluralism or prescriptivism? A CDA of language ideologies in Talento, Peru's official textbook for the first-year of high school. Linguistics and Education, 20, 172199.
Duchêne A., & Heller M. (Eds.). (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Fairclough N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Fairclough N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London, UK: Longman.
Fairclough N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
Fairclough N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In Wodak R. & Meyer M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 162186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fairclough I., & Fairclough N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Foucault M. (1980). Power /knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Gordon C., Ed.; Gordon C., Marshall L., Mehpham J., & Soper K., Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault M. (2003). The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984. (Rabinow P. & Rose N. S., Eds.). New York, NY: New Press.
García O. (2005). Positioning heritage languages in the United States. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 601605.
García O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gee J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Francis & Taylor.
Gramsci A. (1975). Letters from prison. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Gu M. M. (2010). The discursive construction of college English learners’ identity in cross-cultural interactions. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7, 298333.
Gulliver T. (2010). Immigrant success stories in ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 725745.
Habermas J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Heller M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. London, UK: Routledge.
Jones R. H. (2008). Good sex and bad karma: Discourse and the historical body. In Bhatia V. K., Flowerdew J., & Jones R. H. (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 245257). London, UK: Routledge.
Kramsch C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London, UK: Continuum.
Kramsch C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kulick D. (2003). Language and desire. In Holmes J. & Meyerhoff M. (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 119141). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Laclau E., & Mouffe C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London, UK: Verson.
Le Roux K. (2008). A Critical discourse analysis of a real-world problem in mathematics: Looking for signs of change. Language and Education, 22, 307326.
Lee D. (1992). Competing discourses: Perspectives and ideology in language. London, UK: Longman.
Li W. (2011). Multilinguality, multimodality, and multicompetence: Code- and modeswitching by minority ethnic children in complementary schools. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 370384.
Lin A. M. Y. (2014). Hip-hop heteroglossia as practice, pleasure, and public pedagogy: Translanguaging in the lyrical poetics of “24 Herbs” in Hong Kong. In Blackledge A. & Creese A. (Eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (pp. 119136), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Luke A. (2008). TESOL in the corporate university. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 305310.
Mautner G. (2009). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to critical discourse analysis. In Wodak R. & Meyer M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 122143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ministerio de Educación (2005). Ley general de educación No 28044 y sus reglamentos. Lima: GTZ (German Cooperation Agency)/PROEDUCA.
Motha S., & Lin A. M. Y. (2014). “Non-coercive rearrangements”: Theorizing desire in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 331359.
Mishler E. G. (1991). Research interviewing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Halloran K. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28, 124.
Pennycook A. (1990). Towards a critical applied linguistics for the 1990s. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1, 828.
Pennycook A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pennycook A. (2010). Critical and alternative directions in applied linguistics. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 118.
Reisigl M., & Wodak R. (2009). This discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Wodak R. & Meyer M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rogers R. (Ed.). (2012). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Scollon R. (2008). Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization. In Bhatia V. K., Flowerdew J., & Jones R. H. (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 233244). London, UK: Routledge.
Takahashi K. (2013). Language desire: Gender, sexuality, and second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Talmy S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128148.
Talmy S. (2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32, 2542.
van Dijk T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
van Dijk T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In Wodak R. & Meyer M., (Eds.), (Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 6286). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
van Leeuwen T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, UKOxford University Press.
van Lier L. (Ed.). (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective (Vol. 3). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Wortham S. (2012). Beyond macro and micro in the linguistic anthropology of education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 43, 128137.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0267-1905
  • EISSN: 1471-6356
  • URL: /core/journals/annual-review-of-applied-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 33
Total number of PDF views: 484 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1476 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.