Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T15:28:04.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Diffusion of Innovation in Language Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Numa Markee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The last two decades in applied linguistics—which roughly coincide with the evolution of the communicative approach in language teaching—have seen the development of a number of language teaching innovations, including the notional/functional syllabus, the process syllabus, the Natural Approach, the procedural syllabus, and task-based language teaching. All of these proposals have contributed in important ways to an understanding of theoretical issues related to designing innovative language syllabuses. But it is only rather recently that applied linguists have begun to investigate the problems associated with implementing these innovations.

Information

Type
Innovation In Second Language Teaching
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 13 , March 1992 , pp. 229 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, R. and Chen, D.. 1981. The process of educational innovation: An international perspective. London: Kogan Page in association with the UNESCO Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, R. 1980. The background of students from the Indian sub-continent. In British Council (ed.) Study modes and academic development of overseas students. London: the British Council. 104–113. [ELT Documents 109.]Google Scholar
Bowers, R. 1987. Language teacher education: An integrated programme for ELT teacher training. In British Council (ed.) Language teacher education: An integrated programme for ELT teacher training. London: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council. 3–9. [ELT Documents 125.]Google Scholar
Brickell, H. M. 1969. Appraising the effects of innovation in local schools. In Tyler, R. W. (ed.) Educational evaluation: New roles, new means. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education. 284–304.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1981. Notional syllabuses revisited: A response. Applied Linguistics. 2.90–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1984a. Introduction. In Brumfit, C. (ed.) General English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon. 1–4. [ELT Documents 118.]Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1984b. Function and structure of a state school syllabus for learners of second or foreign languages with heterogeneous needs. In Brumfit, C. (ed.) General English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon. 75–82. [ELT Documents 118.]Google Scholar
Chin, R. and Benne, K. D.. 1976. General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In Bennis, W. G., Benne, K. D., Chin, R. and Corey, K. E. (eds.) The planning of change, 3rd ed.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 22–45.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L. 1989. Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. 1983. Research into educational innovation. In. Gray, H. L. (ed.) The management of educational institutions. Lewes, Sussex: The Falmer Press. 245–261.Google Scholar
Havelock, R. G. 1971. The utilization of educational research and development. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2.84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, T. and Cooke, C.. 1982. An ecological approach to ESP. In Waters, A. (ed.) Issues in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 124–143. [Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education 5.]Google Scholar
Huberman, A. M. 1973. Understanding change in education: An introduction. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. 1980. From innovation to adaptability: The changing perspective of curriculum development. In Galton, M. (ed.) Curriculum change: The lessons of a decade. Leicester: Leicester University Press. 65–80.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. 1982. Language planning. Language Teaching. 15.264–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. and Terrell, T.. 1983. The natural approach. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lambright, W. H. and Flynn, P.. 1980. The role of local bureaucracy-centered coalitions in technology transfer to the city. In Agnew, J. A. (ed.) Innovation research and public policy. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. 243–282. [Syracuse Geographical Series No. 5.]Google Scholar
Levine, A. 1980. Why innovation fails. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Crookes, G.. 1992. Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly. 26.27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, A. 1984. Constraints-based syllabuses. In Read, J. A. S. (ed.) Trends in language syllabus design. Singapore: SEAMEO-RELC. 90–111.Google Scholar
Markee, N. 1986a. The importance of sociopolitical factors to communicative course design. The ESP Journal. 5.3–16.Google Scholar
Markee, N. 1986b. Toward an appropriate technology model of communicative course design. English for Specific Purposes. 5.161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B. 1964. Educational innovation: The nature of the problem. In Miles, M. B. (ed.) Innovation in education. New York: Teachers College Press. 1–48.Google Scholar
Munby, J. 1978. Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munby, J. 1984. Communicative syllabus design: Principles and problems. In Read, J. A. S. (ed.) Trends in language syllabus design. Singapore: SEAMEO-RELC. 55–67.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. 1987. Second language pedagogy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. and Shoemaker, F.. 1971. Communication of innovations: A crosscultural approach, 2nd ed.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rudduck, J. 1991. Innovation and change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. 1980. The educational environment and its relevance to ESP programme design. In British Council (ed.) ELT documents special: Projects in materials design. London: The British Council. 61–70.Google Scholar
Swales, J. 1989. Service English programme design and opportunity cost. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.) The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. 1976. Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaltman, G. and Duncan, R.. 1977. Strategies for planned change. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar