Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

IMPACT OF LITERACY ON ORAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: IMPLICATIONS FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH

  • Elaine Tarone and Martha Bigelow

Abstract

In this chapter we describe a body of research on oral language processing that we believe has important implications for applied linguistics. This research documents the effects of literacy on human oral language processing. Studies in this area show that illiterate adults significantly differ from literate adults in their performance of oral processing tasks that require an awareness of linguistic segments. These studies provide evidence that the acquisition of the ability to decode an alphabetic script changes the way in which the individual processes oral language in certain kinds of cognitive tasks. At the same time, based on research establishing a clear reciprocal relationship between oral language processing skills and literacy, researchers on first language acquisition are extending the scope of their study to explore the way in which an individual's language competence is altered and extended by literacy itself. In this discussion, we describe the broad outlines of this new body of research and scholarship, and explore the implications for our understanding of second-language acquisition, and particularly for theories and research that explore the impact of “noticing” on SLA. We conclude by stressing the social and theoretical importance of including clearly-identified illiterate adults in our growing database on second language acquisition research.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Berman R. 2002. Peer commentary on ‘Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model' by Dorit Ravid and Liliana Tolchinsky. Journal of Child Language, 29, 453457.
Bertelson P., de Gelder B., Tfouni L. V., & Morais J. 1989. Metaphonological abilities of adult illiterates: New evidence of heterogeneity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 239250.
Berthoud-Papandropoulou I. 1978. An experimental study of children's ideas about language. In W. J. M Levelt, A. Sinclair & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 5564). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Biber D. 1988. Variation across spoken and written English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Biber D., & Hared M. 1991. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 260282.
Biber D., Reppen R., & Conrad S. 2002. Developing linguistic literacy: Perspectives from corpus linguistics and multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Child Language, 29, 458462.
Bigelow M., Delmas R., Hansen K., & Tarone E. (under review). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA.
Bigelow M., & Tarone E. (in press). The role of literacy level in SLA: Doesn't who we study determine what we know? TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4).
Clahsen H., Meisel J. M., & Pienemann M. 1983. Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb auslandischer Arbeiter. Tubingen: Narr.
De Gelder B., Vroomen J., & Bertelson P. 1993. The effects of alphabetic-reading competence on language representation in bilingual Chinese subjects. Psychological Research, 55, 315321.
Doughty C. & Williams J. 1998. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ferreiro E. 1994. Two literacy histories: A possible dialogue between children and their ancestors. In D. Keller-Cohen Literacy: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 115128). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Fleischman H. L., & Hopstick P. 1993. Descriptive study of services to limited English proficient students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
Gee J. P. 1991. Socio-cultural approaches to literacy (literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 3148.
Gee J. P. 2001. Forward. In T. M. Kalmar (Ed.), Illegal alphabets: Latino migrants crossing the linguistic border (pp. iiv). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goody J. 1987. The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Heath S. B. 1983. Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hill J. 1970. Foreign accents, language acquisition and cerebral dominance revisited. Language Learning, 20, 237248.
Homer B. & Olson D. 1999. Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language and Literacy, 2, 113137.
Jamieson A., Curry A., & Martinez G. 2001. School enrollment in the United States: Social and economic characteristics of students. October, 1999. Current Population Reports (pp. 20533). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Kail M. 2002. Sentence processing studies and linguistic literacy. Journal of Child Language, 29, 463466.
Kolinsky R., Cary L., & Morais J. 1987. Awareness of words as phonological entities: The role of literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 223232.
Krashen S. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Loureiro C., Willadino-Braga L., Souza L., Filho G., Queiroz E., & Dellatolas G. 2004. Degree of illiteracy and phonological and metaphonological skills in unschooled adults. Brain and Language, 89, 499502.
Meisel J. M., Clahsen H., & Pienemann M. 1981. On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109135.
Miller J. 2002. Questions about constructions. Journal of Child Language, 29, 470474.
Morais J., Cary L., Alegría J., & Bertelson P. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323331.
Morais J., Bertelson P., Cary L., & Alegría J. 1986. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 4564.
Nation I. S. P. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Olson D., & Torrance N. (Eds.). 1991. Literacy and orality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ong W. J. 1982. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Piaget J. 1929. The child's conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Pienemann M., & Johnston M. 1987. Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
Read C., Zhang Y., Nie H., & Ding B. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 3144.
Schmidt R. W. 1994. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review: Consciousness and second language learning: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues in language learning and teaching, 11, 1126.
Snowling M. J. 1998. Reading development and its difficulties. Educational and Child Psychology, 15, 4458.
Street B. V. 1995. Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. London: Longman.
Thompkins A., & Binder K. 2003. A comparison of factors affecting performance of functionally illiterate adults and children matched by reading level. Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (2), 236258.
UNESCO 2004. Literacy: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 3.14. Retrieved September 26, 2004 from http://www.uis.unesco.org/ev.php?URL_ID=4926&URL_DO= DO_topic&URL_section=20.
Verhoeven L. 1994. Functional literacy: Theoretical issues and educational implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verhoeven L. 2002. Sociocultural and cognitive constraints on literacy development. Journal of Child Language, 29, 484488.
Vygotsky,L.S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wiley T.G. (in press). Second language literacy and biliteracy. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

IMPACT OF LITERACY ON ORAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: IMPLICATIONS FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH

  • Elaine Tarone and Martha Bigelow

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed