Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues

  • Michael H. Long (a1)

The first aim of this article, addressed in section 1, is to define what is meant, and not meant, by task and task-based language teaching (TBLT). The second is to summarize and evaluate 14 criticisms that have been made of both. Section 2 responds to five alleged problems with TBLT's psycholinguistic rationale, section 3 to six at the classroom level, and section 4 to three claimed problems with implementing TBLT in specific contexts. A few of the criticisms touch on important matters, but most, I will suggest, are nonissues. The third aim of the article is to identify some genuine problems in need of resolution—real issues—and briefly to illustrate research programs under way to address them.

Hide All
E. R. Auerbach , & D. Burgess (1985). The hidden curriculum of survival ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (3), 475495.

C.L. Bonilla (2015). From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for processability theory in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 31 (1), 5374.

A. Bruton (2002a). From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. ELT Journal, 56 (3), 280288.

A. Bruton (2002b). When and how the language development in TBI? ELT Journal, 56 (3), 296297.

A. Bruton (2005). TBLT for the state secondary school classroom? Language Learning Journal, 31, 5568.

R. Cathcart (1989). Authentic discourse and the survival English curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (1), 105126.

S. P. Corder (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161170.

D. Dinsmore (1985). Waiting for Godot in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 39 (4), 225234.

C. J. Doughty (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

C. Doughty (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256310). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

M. East (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

N. C. Ellis (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–52.

R. Ellis (1994). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (1), 91113.

R. Ellis (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 221246.

P. Foster (2009). Task-based language learning research: expecting too much or too little? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 247263.

R. Gilabert , J. Barón , & M. Levkina (2011). Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 105140). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

M. Gonzalez-Lloret , & K. Nielson (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19 (3), 525549.

J. Goo , G. Granena , M. Novella , & Y. Yilmaz (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris and Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443482). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

G. Håkansson , & C. Norrby (2010). Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60 (4), 628650.

J. Hoetker , & W.P. Ahlbrand (1969). The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal, 6 (1), 145167.

Y. Kim (2006). Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (2), 341373.

J. Klapper (2003). Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 27, 3342.

J. Klapper , & Rees , (2003). Reviewing the case for explicit grammar instruction in the university foreign language learning context. Language Teaching Research, 7 (3), 285314.

A. Lenzing (2015). Relating regularities and dynamical systems in L2 development. Language Learning, 65 (1), 89112.

S. Li (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60 (2), 309365.

M. H. Long (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

M. H. Long , & G. Crookes (1992). Three approaches to task-based language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (1), 2756. Reprinted in K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.). Task Based Language Teaching: A reader (pp. 57–81). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, 2009.

M. H. Long , & P. Porter (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 207227.

A. Mackey (1999). Input, interaction and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (4), 557587.

N. Markee (1993).The diffusion of innovation in language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 229243.

I. S. P. Nation (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 5982.

J. M. Norris (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578594). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

J. M. Norris , J. D. Brown , T. D. Hudson , & W. Bonk (2002). Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19 (4), 395418.

J. M. Norris , & L. Ortega (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417528.

D. Nunan (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. English Language Teaching Journal, 41 (2), 136145.

D. Nunan (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (2), 279295.

S. O'Connell (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop. TESL Canada Journal, 31(Special issue 8), 116131.

S.-Y. Oh (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (1), 6996.

L. Ortega (2009). Sequences and processes in language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 81105). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

T. Pica , F. Lincoln-Porter , D. Paninos , & J. Linnell (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30 (1), 5984.

M. Pienemann (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

A. Révész , M. Michel , & R. Gilabert (2015, September 14). Measuring cognitive task demands using dual-task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgments: A validation study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0272263115000339

P. Robinson (2009). Syllabus design. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 294310). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

P. Robinson (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 337). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

V. Samuda (2015). Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 271302). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

M. Saxton (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139161.

P. Seedhouse (1999). Task-based interaction. ELT Journal, 53 (3), 149156.

P. Seedhouse (2005). “Task” as research construct. Language Learning, 55 (3), 533570.

E. J. Serafini , J. Lake , & M. H. Long (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 1126.

N. Shintani (2011). A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15, 137158.

N. Shintani (2013). The effect of focus on form and focus on forms instruction on the acquisition of productive knowledge of L2 vocabulary by young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly, 47 (1), 3662.

P. Skehan (2002). A non-marginal role for tasks. ELT Journal, 56 (3), 289295.

P. Skehan (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance (task-based language teaching). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

M. Swain , L. Brooks , & A. Tocalli-Beller (2002). Peer-peer dialog as a means of second language learning? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171185.

M. Swan (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26 (3), 376401.

J. Truscott (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14, 103135.

K Van den Branden . (Ed.), (2006a). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

K Van den Branden . (2009). Mediating between predetermined order and chaos: The role of the teacher in task-based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 264285.

K. Van Gorp , & B. Deygers (2013). Task-based language assessment. In A. Kunan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment: Vol. 2. Approaches and development (pp. 578593). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

D. Willis (1994). Comments on Michael H. Long and Graham Crookes’ “Three approaches to task-based syllabus design.” A reader reacts. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (4), 726729.

Y. Yano , M. H. Long , & S. Ross (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44 (2), 189219.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0267-1905
  • EISSN: 1471-6356
  • URL: /core/journals/annual-review-of-applied-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 553
Total number of PDF views: 1162 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1452 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.