Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:54:21.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language aptitude: Multiple perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

Catherine J. Doughty  and
Alison Mackey
Catherine J. Doughty
Affiliation:
Foreign Service Institute
Alison Mackey
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Introduction
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 41 , March 2021 , pp. 1 - 5
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language learning, 70(1), 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern language aptitude test. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69(S1), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiraud, P. (1960). Problèmes et méthodes de la statistique linguistique. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2020). Implicit language aptitude. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. O. (2020). Working memory and second language development: A complex, dynamic future? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Qian, J. (2021). Exploring syntactic priming as a measure of implicit language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–32. doi:10.1017/S0272263120000698Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Lognostics.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2013, March 24). Remarks at the Seminar on Individual Differences. University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 159–180). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247–267). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sáfár, A. and Kormos, J. (2008) Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(2), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2012). The modern language aptitude test (paper-and-pencil version). Language Testing, 29(2), 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 17–40). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2019). Language aptitude implicates language and cognitive skills. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 56–77). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R. L., Humbach, N., Patton, J. O. N., & Ganschow, L. (2011). Subcomponents of second-language aptitude and second-language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. C. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. C. (2018). Learner variables important for success in L2 listening comprehension in French immersion classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(1), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasylets, O., & Marín, J. (2020). The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 100786.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Toward an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2019). Working memory as language aptitude: The Phonological/Executive Model. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 187–214). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. E., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (Eds.). (2019). Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J., & Sanz, C. (2020). Does learner cognition count on modality? Working memory and L2 morphosyntactic achievement across oral and written tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(5), 1171–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar