Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Progressions of a New Language: Characterizing Explanation Development for Assessment With Young Language Learners

  • Alison L. Bailey (a1)
Abstract

Few studies have detailed the emergence and growth of the oral language and discourse characteristics of school-age students at different grades and across time (Bailey, 2010; Hoff, 2013). Yet general education teachers and English language specialists need well-articulated, preferably empirically derived progressions of language learning to support their students’ oral language development, particularly with those students who are acquiring English as a new or second language. Explanation skills, which encompass the development of many different language and discourse features, were the focus of this study. The language learners whose elicited oral explanations were used to characterize the order of emergence of features were in kindergarten and third grade (5–6 and 8–9 years old). These students were acquiring English in school with predominantly Spanish as their first language. Development of explanations by a cohort of English monolingual or proficient students provides grade-specific comparison language trajectories. The results are placed within the context of a formative assessment framework in order to assist teachers and students in placing explanations at different phases of sophistication on the progressions. This facilitates charting development and identifying with greater specificity which language and discourse features might be effective targets of contingent instruction to promote students’ oral explanation abilities.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aukrust, V. G. (2004). Explanatory discourse in young second language learners’ peer play. Discourse Studies, 6, 393412.
Bailey, A. L. (2010). Assessment in schools: Oracy. In James, M. (Section Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 285292). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Bailey, A. L. (2016, November). How best to know what our students know. Keynote address presented at the 14th Shanghai International Curriculum Forum, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Bailey, A. L., Blackstock-Bernstein, A., & Heritage, M. H. (2015). At the intersection of mathematics and language: examining mathematical explanations of English proficient and English language learner students. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 628.
Bailey, A. L., Blackstock-Bernstein, A., Ryan, E., & Pitsoulakis, D. (2016). Data mining with natural language processing and corpus linguistics: unlocking access to school-children's language in diverse contexts to improve instructional and assessment practices. In El Atia, S., Zaiane, O., & Ipperciel, D. (Eds.), Data mining and learning analytics in educational research (pp. 255275). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., Stevens, R., & Lord, C. (2007). Further specifying the language demands of school. In Bailey, A. L. (Ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic language to the test (pp. 103156). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy, grades K–6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/Sage Press.
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2014). The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48 (3), 480506.
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2017). Imperatives for teacher education: Findings from studies of effective teaching for English language learners. In Peters, M., Cowie, B., & Menter, I. (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Beals, D. (1993). Explanatory talk in low-income families’ mealtime conversations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14 (4), 489514.
Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cosentino de Cohen, C., & Chu Clewell, B, (2007). Putting English language learners on the educational map. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2012). Framework for English language proficiency development standards corresponding to the common core state standards and the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: Author.
Covitt, B., & Anderson, C. W. (2018). Assessing scientific genres of argument, explanation and prediction. In Bailey, A. L., Maher, C., & Wilkinson, L. C. (Eds.), Language, literacy, and learning in the STEM disciplines: How language counts for English learners. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor Francis.
Donaldson, M. L. (1986). Children's explanations: A psycholinguistic study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Flores, S. M., Batalova, J., & Fix, M. (2012). The educational trajectories of English language learners in Texas. Washington, DC: The Migration Policy Institute.
Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2011). Discourse analysis: Written text. In Duke, N. K. & Mallettee, M. H. (Eds.), Literary research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 104134). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
Halliday, M., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Retrieved from Council of Chief State School Officers website: http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Learning_Progressions_Supporting_2008.pdf
Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41 (2), 5664.
Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental psychology, 49 (1), 414.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33,159174.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42 (4), 223233.
McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1985). A naturalistic study of the production of causal connectives by children. Journal of Child Language, 12 (1), 145159.
Moje, E., Peek-Brown, D., Sutherland, L., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Explaining explanations: Developing scientific literacy in middle school project based science reform. In Strickland, D. & Alvermann, D. E. (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4–12. (pp. 227251). New York, NY: Carnegie.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Fast facts. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/fastfacts
National Education Association (2011). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator's guide to the “four Cs.” Retrieved from National Education Association (NEA) website: http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf
National Governors Association (NGA) & Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices and CCSSO.
Nippold, M. A., & Scott, C. M. (2010). Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: Development and disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Peterson, S. M., & French, L. (2008). Supporting young children's explanations through inquiry science in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (3), 395408.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snow, C. E. (1991). The theoretical basis for relationships between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 6, 510.
Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), 610631.
Taylor, A., Bailey, A., Cooper, P., Dwyer, C. A., & Lieb, B., (2007). Gender differences in reading and communication skills. In Klein, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (pp. 281303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Valdés, G. (2005). Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized? The Modern Language Journal, 89 (3), 410426.
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Introduction to this special issue: Vocabulary growth and reading skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15 (1), 17.
Zhao, W., Mok, I. A. C., & Cao, Y. (2016). Curriculum reform in China: Student participation in classrooms using a reformed instructional model. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 88101.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0267-1905
  • EISSN: 1471-6356
  • URL: /core/journals/annual-review-of-applied-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed