Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-lxspr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-03T22:22:34.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stages of Acquisition and the P/E Model of Working Memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

Zhisheng (Edward) Wen  and
Peter Skehan
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen*
Affiliation:
Macao Polytechnic Institute, Macao
Peter Skehan
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University College London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: edwardwen@ipm.edu.mo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the roles of both working memory (WM) and more traditional aptitude components, such as input processing and language analytic ability in the context of foreign language learning aptitude. More specifically, the paper compares two current perspectives on language aptitude: the Stages Approach (Skehan, 2016, 2019) and the P/E Model (Wen, 2016, 2019). Input processing and noticing, pattern identification and complexification, and feedback are examined as they relate to both perspectives and are then used to discuss existing aptitude testing, recent research, and broader theoretical issues. It is argued that WM and language aptitude play different but complementary roles at each of these stages, reflecting the various linguistic and psycholinguistic processes that are most prominent in other aspects of language learning. Overall, though both perspectives posit that WM and language aptitude have equal importance at the input processing stage, they exert greater influence at each of the remaining stages. More traditional views of aptitude dominate at the pattern identification and complexification stage and WM with the feedback stage.

Keywords

language aptitudethe Stages Approachworking memorythe P/E Modellanguage analytic abilityinput processingfeedback

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 41 , March 2021 , pp. 6 - 24
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atkins, P. W. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3),189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Wen, Z., Mota, M., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G.A. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2021). A multicomponent model of working memory. In Logie, R. H., Camos, V. & Cowan, N. (Eds.), Working Memory: State of the Science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language acquisition device. Psychological Review 105, 158–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, M. F., Cowan, N., & Saults, J. S. (2006). How does running memory span work? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(10), 1691–1700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Training Research and Education (pp. 87–136). University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T. & Stansfield, C. W. (Eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered (pp. 11–29). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT). The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Chan, E., Skehan, P., & Gong, G. (2011). Working memory, phonemic coding ability and foreign language aptitude: Potential for construction of specific language aptitude tests—the case of Cantonese. Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English language, literatures and cultural studies, 60, 45–73.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.Google Scholar
Conway, A., Kane, M., Bunting, M., Hambrick, D., Wilhelm, O., & Engel, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2015). Second language use, theories of working memory and the Vennian mind. In Z. Wen, M. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 29–40). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1158–1170. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 249–276.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2019). The future of language aptitude research. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R.. (2019), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 317–329). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J. (2001). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 256–310). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 68, 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2019). Foreword. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S.., & Sparks, R. (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajewski, P. D., Hanisch, E., Falkenstein, M., Thönes, S., & Wascher, E. (2018). What does the n-Back task measure as we get older? Relations between working-memory measures and other cognitive functions across the lifespan. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2208, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gass, S.M. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. (2006). Non-word repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513–543. DOI: 10.1017.S0142716406060383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. & Emslie, H., (1994). The children's test of non-word repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2(2), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Christiansen, M. H. & Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. (2020). Memory limitations are hidden in grammar. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XHRIYX. Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G. (2020). Implicit language aptitude. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P.S. (1975). Aptitude testing: An ongoing experiment. Audio-Visual Language Journal, 12, 205–210.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. O. (2016). An empirical study of working memory, personality, and second language construction learning. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 157–184). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V. & Brooks, P. (2016). Miniature natural language learning in L2 acquisition research. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.). Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 41–68). John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis. Longman.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2017). The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. In Gurzynski, L. (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors and researchers (pp. 42–70). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21(4), 861–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logie, R.H., Camos, V. & Cowan, N. (2021). Working memory: State of the science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, B. & Wen, Z. (forthcoming). Working memory and the language device. In Schwieter, J. & Z. Wen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. (pp. 181–209). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological STM and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379–413. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Lognostics.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: working memory as language aptitude. In Healey, A. F. & Bourne, L. J. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. & Friedman, N.P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, A., Brown, G.D.A., Cowan, N., Donkin, C., Farrell, S., Hitch, G.J., Hurlstone, M., Ma, W., Morey, C.C., Nee, D.E., Schweppe, J., Vergauwe, E., & Ward, G. (2018). Benchmarks for models of working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(9), 885–958. doi: 10.1037/bul0000153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C. (forthcoming). Working memory as the language learning device: An update. In Schwieter, J. & Wen, Z., (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, C.R. & Al-Haik, A. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory (vol. 15). John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Reiterer, S. M. (Ed.) (2018). Exploring language aptitude: Views from psychology, the language sciences, and cognitive neuroscience (vol. 11). Springer.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Research the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance. (pp. 3–38). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Kachlicka, M., Sun, H., & Tierney, A. (2020). Domain-general auditory processing as an anchor of post-pubertal L2 pronunciation learning: Behavioural and neurophysiological investigations of perceptual acuity, age, experience, development, and attainment. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, 104168, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Sun, H., & Tierney, A. (2020). Domain-general auditory processing determines success in second language pronunciation learning in adulthood: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(5), 1083–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., Lin, H-J, Lado, B., Stafford, C. A., & Bowden, H. W. (2016). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 669–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwieter, J., & Wen, Z. (forthcoming). The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (2017). Language aptitude: desirable trait or acquirable attribute? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1982). Memory and motivation in language aptitude testing. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of London.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381–395). Routledge.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 17–40). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2019). Language aptitude implicates language and cognitive skills. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 56–77). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1995). Prognostication and language aptitude testing. Language Testing, 12, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytic ability. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L. and Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 135–58). Routledge.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Patten, B. (2004). Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections. In B. Van Patten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning Connection in Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 29–47). Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuong, L. C. & Wong, P. C. M. (2019). From individual differences in language aptitude to personalized learning. In Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., Skehan, P., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 330–42). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S. & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, Z. (2012a). Foreign language aptitude. ELT Journal, 66(2), 233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2012b). Working memory and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The Phonological/Executive model. In Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 41–62). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Toward an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2019). Working memory as language aptitude: The Phonological/Executive Model. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 187–214). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (forthcoming). Reflections on language aptitude models and tests. In Mercer, S. & Gregersen, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of psychology of language learning and teaching. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., Baddeley, A., & Cowan, N. (forthcoming). Working memory in first and second language: A tale of two paradigms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., Skehan, P., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (Eds.) (2019). Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., & Jackson, D. (forthcoming). Working memory capacity and functions. In Li, S., Papi, M. & Hiver, P. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., Juffs, A., & Winke, P. (2021). Measuring working memory. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and testing (pp. 167–76). Routledge.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., Mota, M., & Mcneill, A. (2013). Working memory and SLA: Innovations in theory and research. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23, 1–18.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude”. Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English language, literatures and cultural studies, 60, 15–44. doi:10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p015.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J. (2020). On the scope of output in SLA: Task modality, salience, L2 grammar noticing and development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–33.Google Scholar
Zalbidea, J., Issa, B. I., Faretta-Stuttenberg, M. & Sanz, C. (2020). Initial proficiency and L2 grammar development during short-term immersion abroad: Conceptual and methodological insights. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–29.Google Scholar