Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vcb8f Total loading time: 0.337 Render date: 2022-09-25T11:27:06.445Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Dr Malcolm Clark was a research student in the Department of Statistics in the University of Sheffield and when there worked in collaboration with Professor Renfrew. His Ph.D was on the statistical problems of C14 calibration, and he here presents us with an objectively derived calibration curve for radiocarbon dates which will be of great value to all archaeologists. He is now Lecturer in Statistics in the Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

References

Baxter, M. S. 1974. Calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, Nature, 249, 93.10.1038/249093a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M. S., and Walton, A.. 1971. Fluctuation of atmospheric carbon-14 during the past century, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 321, 105–27.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Fergusson, G. J., and Libby, W. F.. 1965. UCLA Radiocarbon Dates IV, Radiocarbon, 7, 336371.10.1017/S0033822200037310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Olson, E. A.. 1959. Lamont Radiocarbon Measurements VI, Radiocarbon, 1, 111132.10.1017/S0033822200020427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. M. 1973. Non-parametric function-fitting. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Clark, R. M., and Renfrew, C.. 1972. A statistical approach to the calibration of floating tree-ring chronologies using radiocarbon dates, Archaeometry, 14, 519.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1972.tb00046.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. M., and Renfrew, C.. 1973. Tree-ring calibration of radiocarbon dates and the chronology of ancient Egypt, Nature, 243, 266–70.10.1038/243266a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. M., and Renfrew, C.. 1974. Reply to Baxter and Aitken, Nature, 249, 94.10.1038/249094b0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1947. Some consequences when the assumptions for the Analysis of Variance are not satisfied, Biometrics, 3, 2238.10.2307/3001535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, L. A. 1972. The evaluation of radiocarbon measurements and inherent statistical limitations in age resolution, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Radiocarbon Dating, Lower Hutt City, 2, 598611.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A. and Grey, D. C.. 1970. Arizona radiocarbon dates for dendrochronologically-dated samples. In Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology (Olsson, I. U., Ed.), 615–18 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A. and Wallick, E. I., 1972. Dendrochronological calibration of the carbon-14 time scale, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Radiocarbon Dating, Lower Hutt City, 1, 4559.Google Scholar
De Vries, H. 1958. Variations in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth, Koninkl. Nederl. Akademie van Wetensch., Amsterdam, Proc. Ser. B., 61, 94102.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. G., and Baxter, M. S.. 1972. Short-term trends in natural radiocarbon, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Radiocarbon Dating, Lower Hutt City, 1, 7585.Google Scholar
Houtermans, J. C. 1971. Geophysical interpretations of bristlecone pine radiocarbon measurements using a method of Fourier analysis for unequally-spaced data. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Berne.Google Scholar
Hultin, E. 1972. The accuracy of radiocarbon dating, Etnologiska Studier, 32, 185–96.Google Scholar
Kigoshi, K. and Hasegawa, H.. 1966. Secular variation of atmospheric radiocarbon concentration and its dependence on geomagnetism, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1065–71.10.1029/JZ071i004p01065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kigoshi, K. and Kobayashi, H., 1966. Gakushuin Natural Radiocarbon Measurements V, Radiocarbon, 8, 5473.10.1017/S0033822200000059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, J. C., Mook, W. G. and Vogel, J. C.. 1970. C-14 in tree-rings from different localities. In Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology (Olsson, I. U., Ed.), 275301 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K.. 1972. Discussion of radiocarbon dates obtained from precisely dated Sequoia and Bristlecone Pine samples, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Radiocarbon Dating, Lower Hutt City, 1, 2843.Google Scholar
Mielke, J. E., and Long, A.. 1969. Smithsonian Institution Radiocarbon Measurements V, Radiocarbon, 11, 163–82.10.1017/S0033822200064511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, E. 1970. The accuracy of radiocarbon dating. In Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology (Olsson, I. U., Ed.), 2334. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Olsson, I. U., El Gammal, S., and Göksu, Y.. 1969. Uppsala Natural Radiocarbon Measurements IX, Radiocarbon, 11, 515–44.10.1017/S0033822200011401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, B. and Ottaway, J. H.. 1972. The Suess calibration curve and archaeological dating, Nature, 239, 512–13.10.1038/239512a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, B. and Ottaway, J. H.. 1974. Irregularities in dendrochronological calibration, Nature, 250, 407–8.10.1038/250407a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, E. K, and Michael, H. N.. 1970. masca radiocarbon dates for Sequoia and bristlecone pine samples. In Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology (Olsson, I. U., Ed.), 619–23 (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K., Michael, H. N. and Han, M. C.. 1973. Radiocarbon dates and reality, masca Newsletter, 9, No. 1, 120.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. 1965. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Reinsch, C. H. 1967. Smoothing by spline functions, Numer. Math., 10, 177–83.10.1007/BF02162161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973. Before Civilisation: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. (Jonathan Cape, London).Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. and Clark, R. M.. 1974. Problems of the radiocarbon calendar and its calibration, Archaeometry, 16, 518.10.1111/j.1475-4754.1974.tb01088.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, J. R. 1969. The Approximation of Functions (Vol. 2), (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.).Google Scholar
Stone, M. 1964. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, XXXVI, 111–47.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1969. Yale Natural Radiocarbon Measurements IX, Radiocarbon, 11, 545658.10.1017/S0033822200011413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1965. Secular variations of the cosmic-ray produced carbon-14 in the atmosphere and their interpretations, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 59375952.10.1029/JZ070i023p05937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1967. Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale from 4100 B.C. to 1500 B.C., Proc. Symp. on Radiocarbon Dating and Methods of Low-Level Counting, Monaco, 143151 (I.A.E.A., Vienna).Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1970. Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale from 5400 B.C. to the present. In Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology (Olsson, I. U., Ed.), 303–12, and Plates I and II (Wiley, New York.)Google Scholar
Wahba, G. and Wold, S.. 1974. A completely-automatic French curve: fitting spline functions by cross validation. Technical Report No. 379, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Wendland, W. M., and Donley, D. L.. 1971. Radiocarbon-calendar age relationship, Earth Plan. Sci. Letters, 11, 135–9.10.1016/0012-821X(71)90155-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, E. H., Tauber, H., and Münnich, K. O., 1960. Variations in the atmospheric radiocarbon concentration over the past 1300 years, Radiocarbon, 2, 14.Google Scholar
Wold, S. 1974. Spline functions in data analysis, Technometrics, 16, 111.10.1080/00401706.1974.10489142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
240
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *