Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-66nw2 Total loading time: 0.314 Render date: 2021-12-01T13:43:21.358Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

When peripheries were centres: a preliminary study of the Shimao-centred polity in the loess highland, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2018

Li Jaang*
Affiliation:
School of History, Zhengzhou University, 100 Science Road, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Zhouyong Sun
Affiliation:
Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, 31 Leyou Road, Xi’an 710054, China
Jing Shao
Affiliation:
Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, 31 Leyou Road, Xi’an 710054, China
Min Li
Affiliation:
Department of Asian Languages & Cultures and Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
*Author for correspondence (Email: lijaangchina@gmail.com)

Abstract

Chinese civilisation has long been assumed to have developed in the Central Plains in the mid to late second millennium BC. Recent archaeological discoveries at the Bronze Age site of Shimao, however, fundamentally challenge traditional understanding of ‘peripheries’ and ‘centres’, and the emergence of Chinese civilisation. This research reveals that by 2000 BC, the loess highland was home to a complex society representing the political and economic heartland of China. Significantly, it was found that Later Bronze Age core symbols associated with Central Plains civilisations were, in fact, created much earlier at Shimao. This study provides important new perspectives on narratives of state formation and the emergence of civilisation worldwide.

Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 92 , Issue 364 , August 2018 , pp. 1008 - 1022
Copyright
© Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunson, K. 2011. Zhongguo xinshiqi shidai wanqi dongwu liyong de bianhua ge’an yanjiu. Sandai kaogu 4: 146158.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. 2009. Towards a networks and boundaries approach to early complex polities: the late Shang case. Current Anthropology 50: 821848. https://doi.org/10.1086/648398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. 2014. Archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age: from Erlitou to Anyang. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cattelain, P. 2006. Apparition et évolution de l’arc et des pointes de flèches dans la Préhistoire européenne (Paléo-, Méso-, Néolitique), in P. Bellintani (ed.) Catene operative dell’ Arco preistorico: 4566. Trento: Giunta della Provincia Autonoma di Trento.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Xiong, J., Shao, J. & Sun, Z.. 2016. Shaanxi Shenmu Shimao chengzhi jisikeng chutu tougu yanjiu. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 134142.Google Scholar
Chen, X. 2012. Hexi zoulang ji qi linjin diqu qingtong shidai yicun yanjiu. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Jilin University.Google Scholar
Dai, X. 2016. Beifang diqu Longshan shidai de juluo yu shehui. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 6069.Google Scholar
Dai, Y. 1993. Shenmu Shimao Longshan wenhua yuqi tansuo. Gugong wenwu yuekan 1993(5): 4455.Google Scholar
Deng, C. 1997. Dongya Xianqin yazhang zhuwenti. Zhongguo wenhua yanjiusuo xuebao 1997: 325332.Google Scholar
Deng, S. 1993. Yetan Huaxi xitong de yuqi. Gugong wenwu yuekan 1993(6): 6071.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, N. 2002. Ancient China and its enemies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, N. 2007. Shiqian zhi shi’er shiji Zhongguo Beifangdiqu de dongxi wenhuajiaoliu. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Inner Mongolia University.Google Scholar
Glatz, C. & Casana, J.. 2016. Of highland-lowland borderlands: local societies and foreign power in the Zagros-Mesopotamian interface. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 44: 127147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2016.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, W. & Zhang, S.. 2005. Henan Gongyishi Huadizui yizhi Xinzhaiqi yicun. Kaogu 2005(6): 36.Google Scholar
Guo, Q., Sun, Z. & Shao, J.. 2016. Shimao waicheng dongmenzhi he zaoqi chengjian jishu. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 88101.Google Scholar
Han, J. 2007. Laohushan wenhua de kuozhang yu duiwai yingxiang. Zhongyuan wenwu 2007(1): 2026.Google Scholar
He, N., Yan, Z. & Song, J.. 2003. Taosi chengzhi faxian Taosiwenhua zhongqi muzang. Kaogu 2003: 771774.Google Scholar
Jaang, L. 2011. Long-distance interactions as reflected in the earliest Chinese bronze mirrors, in L. von Falkenhausen (ed.) Beyond the surface: the Lloyd Cotsen study collection of Chinese bronze mirrors, volume II, studies: 3449. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Jaang, L. 2015. The landscape of China’s participation in the Bronze Age Eurasian network. Journal of World Prehistory 28: 179213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-015-9088-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M. 2016. Settling on the ruins of Xia: archaeology of social memory in early China, in G. Emberling (ed.) Social theory in archaeology and ancient history: 291327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, M. 2017. Chong fan Xiaxu. Kaogu xuebao 2017: 287316.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. 1986. A re-examination of the relationship between bronzes of the Shang culture and of the Northern Zone, in K.C. Chang (ed.) Studies of Shang archaeology: 237273. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linduff, K. 1995. Zhukaigou, steppe culture and the rise of Chinese civilization. Antiquity 59: 133145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00064358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. 2004. The Chinese Neolithic: trajectories to early states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, L. & Chen, X.. 2003. State formation in early China. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Liu, L. & Chen, X. 2012. The archaeology of China: from the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, K. & Zhu, Y.. 1995. New research on the origin of cowries in ancient China. Sino-Platonic Papers 68: 121.Google Scholar
Shaanxisheng & Yulinshi (Shaanxisheng Wenwu Kaogusuo & Yulinshi Wenwu Baohu Yanjiusuo). 2005. Shenmu Xinhua. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Shao, J. 2016. Shilun Shimao chengzhi de niandai ji xiujian guocheng. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 102108.Google Scholar
Shelach, G., Raphael, K. & Jaffee, Y.. 2011. Sanzuodian: the structure, function and social significance of the earliest stone fortified sites in China. Antiquity 85: 1126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00067405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Q. 2008. Zhoudai yongyu zhidu yanjiu. Shanghai: Guji chubanshe.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. 2016. Gongyuanqian di sanqianji Beifang diqu shehui fuzahuaguocheng kaocha. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 7079.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. & Shao, J.. 2016a. Wengcheng suyuan: yi Shimao yizhi waicheng dongmenzhi wei zhongxin. Wenwu 2016(2): 5056.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. & Shao, J. 2016b. Mamian suyuan: yi Shimao yizhi waicheng dongmenzhi wei zhongxin. Kaogu 2016(6): 8289.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. & Shao, J. 2017. Shimaocheng: Tuwei hepan shenmi gucheng Fenhe Taosi yidiyiyou. Zhongguo guojia dili 2017(10): 142151.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Shao, J., Shao, A., Kang, N., Qu, F. & Liu, X.. 2013. Shaanxi Shenmuxian Shimao yizhi. Kaogu 2013(7): 1524.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Shao, J., Shao, A., Kang, N., Qu, F., Liu, X. & Bai, H.. 2015. Shaanxi Shenmuxian Shimao yizhi Houyangwan, Hujiawa didian shijue jianbao. Kaogu 2015(5): 6071.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Shao, J., Shao, A., Zhao, X., Yang, G., Kang, N., Zhou, J., Li, J., Qu, F., Liu, X., Wei, X., Xu, K. & Gao, S.. 2016. Shaanxi Shenmuxian Shimao yizhi Hanjiagedan didian fajue jianbao. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 1424.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Shao, J., Di, N., Kang, N., Zhao, Y., Shao, A. & Xia, N.. 2017. Shaanxi Shenmuxian Shimao chengzhi Hangchengtai didian. Kaogu 2017(7): 4656.Google Scholar
von Falkenhausen, L. 1993. On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology. Antiquity 67: 839849. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00063821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. & Sun, Z.. 2011. Shimao yuqi de niandai ji xiangguan wenti. Kaogu yu wenwu 2011(4): 4049.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Hai, J., Zhang, G., Bai, Y., Zhang, Y., Jia, W., An, G., Sun, X., Liang, X. & Gao, Z.. 2016. 2015 nian Shanxi Xingxian Bicun yizhi fajue jianbao. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 2533.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. 2012. Qijiawenhua yuqi de kaoguxue yanjiu. Unpublished MA dissertation, Jilin University.Google Scholar
Xu, H. 2009 Zuizao de Zhongguo. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yan, Z. & He, N.. 2005. Shanxi Xiangfen Taosi chengzhi 2002 nian fajue baogao. Kaogu xuebao 2005: 307346.Google Scholar
Yang, J. & Cao, J.. 2007. Luelun Zhongguo Beifangdiqu gudai youmuminzu wenhua fazhanmoshi. Jilindaxue shehuikexue xuebao 2007(5): 140146.Google Scholar
Ye, X. 2013. Yushi zhilu yu Huaxiawenming de ziyuanyilai. Shanghai Jiaotong daxue xuebao 2013(6): 1826.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. [L. Jaang]. 2012. Cong Longshan dao Erlitou: yi Songshan nanbei wei zhongxin. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Peking University.Google Scholar
Zhang, T. & Ding, Y.. 2016. Shiluoluoshan Longshan gucheng ji xiangguan wenti qianlun. Kaogu yu wenwu 2016(4): 4551.Google Scholar
Zhao, H. 2016. Shaanxi Shenmu Shimao yizhi kaogu fajue yanjiu de jinzhan ji xueshu yiyi. Zhongguo wenwu bao August 23: 3.Google Scholar
ZKKS, & Shanxisheng, (Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Kaogusuo & Shanxisheng Linfenshi Wenwuju). 2015. Xiangfen Taosi. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
20
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

When peripheries were centres: a preliminary study of the Shimao-centred polity in the loess highland, China
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

When peripheries were centres: a preliminary study of the Shimao-centred polity in the loess highland, China
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

When peripheries were centres: a preliminary study of the Shimao-centred polity in the loess highland, China
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *