Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-r9vz2 Total loading time: 0.173 Render date: 2021-08-01T12:09:54.881Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Administrators' bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jill Goulder
Affiliation:
*Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK (Email: jill@jgoulder.com)
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Well-designed experimental archaeology combined with ingenious social argument show that a type of coarse-ware pottery, the BRB, performed a key role in early Mesopotamian governance. Its thick walls and conical shape produce a fine loaf of risen bread, supplied perhaps as tasty recompense to those undertaking the newly-proliferating public administrative duties.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2010

References

Adams, R.M. 1972. The Uruk countryside. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Algaze, G. 2001. Initial social complexity in south-west Asia: the Mesopotamian advantage. Current Anthropology 42(2): 199233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badler, V. 1995. Winemaking, distribution and consumption at proto-historic Godin Tepe, Iran, in McGovern, P.E., Fleming, S.J. & Katz, S.H. (ed.) The origins and ancient history of wine: 4556. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
Balfet, H. 1980. A propos du métier d'argile: exemple de dialogue entre ethnologie et archéologie, in Barrelet, M.T. (ed.) L'archéologie de l'Iraq: du début de l'époque néolithique à 333 avant notre ère: perspectives et limites de l'interprétation anthropologique des documents, Paris 13-15 Juin, 1978: 7184. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Baumgärtel, E.J. 1947. The cultures of prehistoric Egypt, volume I. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beale, T.W. 1978. Bevelled-rim bowls and their implications for change and economic organization in the later fourth millennium. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 37: 289313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccellati, G. 1999. Urkesh and the question of early human urbanism, in Hudson, M. & Levine, B.A. (ed.) Urbanization and land ownership: 229250. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Charvát, P. 2002. Mesopotamia before history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chazan, M. & Lehner, M.. 1990. An ancient analogy: pot baked bread in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. Paléorient 16(2): 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. 2000. The Uruk phenomenon: the role of social ideology in the expansion of the Uruk culture during the fourth millennium BC (British Archaeological Reports International Series 900). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Crawford, H. 2004. Sumer and the Sumerians. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delougaz, P. 1952. Pottery from the Diyala region. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Delougaz, P. & Kantor, H.J.. 1996. Chogha Mish. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Forest, J.-D. 1987. Les bevelled rim bowls: nouvelle tentative d'interprétation. Akkadica 53: 124.Google Scholar
Frangipane, M. 2001. Centralization processes in Greater Mesopotamia: Uruk ‘expansion’ as the climax of systemic interactions among areas of the Greater Mesopotamian region, in Rothman, M.S. (ed.) Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation: 307348. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Frangipane, M. 2002. Non-Uruk developments and Uruk-linked features on the northern borders of Greater Mesopotamia, in Postgate, J.N. (ed.) Artefacts of complexity: tracking the Uruk in the Near East: 123148. Warminster: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Gaimster, D. & Freestone, I.. 1997. Introduction, in Freestone, I. & Gaimster, D. (ed.) Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions: 919. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Jacquet-Gordon, H. 1981. A tentative typology of Egyptian bread-moulds, in Arnold, D. (ed.) Studien zur Altägyptischen Keramik: 1124. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Joffe, A.H. 1998. Alcohol and social complexity in ancient Western Asia. Current Anthropology 39(3): 297322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G.A. 1973. Local exchange and early state development in south-western Iran. Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.A. 1976. Early state organization in south-western Iran: preliminary field report, in Bagherzadeh, F. (ed.) IVth symposium on Iran: 190223. Tehran: Iranian Centre for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Kalsbeek, J. 1980. La céramique de série du Djebel ‘Aruda (à l'époque d'Uruk). Akkadica 20: 111.Google Scholar
Kemp, B.J. 2006. Ancient Egypt: anatomy of a civilisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Le Brun, A. 1980. Les écuelles grossières: état de la question, in Barrelet, M.-T. (ed.) L'archéologie de l'Iraq: du début de l'époque néolithique à 333 avant notre ère: perspectives et limites de l'interprétation anthropologique des documents, Paris 13-15 Juin, 1978: 5970. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Lehner, M. 1995. The Giza Plateau mapping project: 1993-4 annual report. Available at: http://oi.uchicago.edu/research/pubs/ar/93-94/giza.html, accessed 25 November 2008.Google Scholar
Mahias, M.-C. 1993. Pottery techniques in India: technical variants and social choice, in Lemonnier, P. (ed.) Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic: 157180. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mallowan, M.E.L. 1933. The prehistoric sondage of Nineveh 1931-2, in Campbell-Thompson, R. & Mallowan, M.E.L. (ed.) The British Museum excavations at Nineveh 1931-2 (University of Liverpool Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 20, 2): 127186. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, E. & MYNORS, H.S.. 1988. Tell Rubeidheh: pottery from the Uruk mound, in Killick, R.G. (ed.) Tell Rubeidheh: an Uruk village in the Jebel Hamrin: 3976. Warminster: Aris & Phillips/British School of Archaeology in Iraq and the Directorate of Antiquities.Google Scholar
Millard, A.R. 1988. The bevelled-rim bowls: their purpose and significance. Iraq 50: 4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. 1981. Straw tempered ware, in Wright, H.T. (ed.) An early town on the Deh Luran Plain: excavations at Tepe Farukhabad: 126129. Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Nicholas, I.M. 1987. The function of bevelled-rim bowls: a case study at the TUV mound, Tal-e Malyan, Iran. Paléorient 13(2): 6172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H.J. 1988. The early history of the ancient Near East, 9000-2000 BC. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, D. & Oates, J.. 1976. Early irrigation agriculture in Mesopotamia, in de Sieveking, G., Longworth, I.H. & Wilson, K.E. (ed.) Problems in economic and social Archaeology: 109135. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Oates, D. 1993. Excavations at Tell Brak 1992-3. Iraq 55: 155200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltenburg, E., Bolger, D., Campbell, S., Murray, M.A. & Tipping, R.. 1996. Jerablus-Tahtani, Syria, 1995: preliminary report. Levant 28: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, S., Pope, M. & cCOURSEY, C.. 1996. Household production at the Uruk mound, Abu Salabikh, Iraq. American Journal of Archaeology 100(4): 683698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, S. & Coursey, C.. 1996. Hacinebi Uruk pottery: preliminary report. American Journal of Archaeology 100(2): 233239.Google Scholar
Potts, D.T. 1984. On salt and salt gathering in ancient Mesopotamia. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 27(3): 225271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, D.T. 1997. Mesopotamian civilization: the material foundations. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Potts, D.T. 2009. Bevel-rim bowls and bakeries: evidence and explanations from Iran and the Indo-Iranian borderlands. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 61: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, M.S. 2002. Tepe Gawra: chronology and socio-economic change, in Postgate, J.N. (ed.) Artefacts of complexity: tracking the Uruk in the Near East: 4969. Warminster: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Rye, O.S. 1981. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington (DC): Taraxacum.Google Scholar
Samuel, D. 2000. Brewing and baking, in Nicholson, P.T. & Shaw, I. (ed.) Ancient Egyptian materials and technology: 537576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1992. Before writing. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. 1982. Zur Verwendung der mesopotamischen ‘Glockentopfe’. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 12: 317319.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. 2001. Syria and the Uruk expansion, in Rothman, M.S. (ed.) Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation: 233264. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 2006. Bread, butter and beer: dietary change and urbanisation in early Mesopotamia and surrounding areas (6000-3000 BC). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Simpson, St. J. 1997. Early urban ceramic industries in Mesopotamia, in Freestone, I. & Gaimster, D. (ed.) Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions: 5055. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Stein, G.J.& Misir, A.. 1996. The fourth-millennium occupation of Hacinebi. American Journal of Archaeology 100(2): 206222.Google Scholar
Stephen, F.M.K. & Peltenburg, E.. 2002. Scientific analyses of Uruk ceramics from Jerablus Tahtani and other Middle-Upper Euphrates sites, in Postgate, J.N. (ed.) Artefacts of complexity: tracking the Uruk in the Near East: 173181. Warminster: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Strommenger, E. 1980. Habuba Kabira: eine Stadt vor 5000 Jahren. Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft am Euphrat in Habuba Kabira, Syrien. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D. 1974/5. Untersuchungen zur Keramikproduktion innerhalb der spät-Urukzeitlichen Siedlung Habuba Kabira-Süud in Nord-Syrien. Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica 5/6: 43164.Google Scholar
Tomita, T. 1998. Late Chalcolithic chronology in Syria and Northern Mesopotamia, in Tsuneki, A. & Miyake, Y. (ed.) Excavations at Tell Umm Qseir in middle Khabur Valley, north Syria: report of the 1996 season: 197201. Tsukuba, Japan: Department of Archaeology, Institute of History and Anthropology, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Van Der Leeuw, S. 1993. Giving the potter a choice: conceptual aspects of pottery techniques, in Lemonnier, P. (ed.) Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic: 238288. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, H.T. 1981. An early town on the Deh Luran Plain: excavations at Tepe Farukhabad. Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Wright, H.T. 1998. Uruk states in south-western Iran, in Feinman, G.M. & Marcus, J. (ed.) Archaic states: 172197. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Wright, H.T. 2001. Cultural action in the Uruk world, in Rothman, M.S. (ed.) Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation: 123148. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Wright, H.T. & Rupley, E.S.A.. 2001. Calibrated radiocarbon age determinations of Uruk-related assemblages, in Rothman, M.S. (ed.) Uruk Mesopotamia and its neighbors: cross-cultural interactions in the era of state formation: 85122. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Wright, H.T., Miller, N.F. & Redding, R.. 1980. Time and process in an Uruk rural centre, in Barrelet, M.-T. (ed.) L'Archéologie de l'Iraq: du début de l’époque néolithique à 333 avant notre ère: perspectives et limites de l'interprétation anthropologique des documents, Paris 13-15 Juin, 1978: 265284. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
You have Access
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Administrators' bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Administrators' bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Administrators' bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *