Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Archaeology and ‘QAA subject review’: what did we learn?

  • Anthony Harding (a1) and Matthew Johnson (a1)
Abstract

The authors recount their personal experience of the recent assessment of archaeology teaching in the United Kingdom.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Archaeology and ‘QAA subject review’: what did we learn?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Archaeology and ‘QAA subject review’: what did we learn?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Archaeology and ‘QAA subject review’: what did we learn?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Austin, D. 1996. Reflections of an ex-assessor, Antiquity 70: 253–5.
Baty, P. 2002. Hodge calls the shots, Times Higher Education Supplement 22 February.
Bundy, C. 2002. Opinion, Guardian Education 26 March: 15.
Chippindale, C. 2001. What’s the score? Times Higher Education Supplement 29 June.
Halstead, P. 2001. Audit or educate? Archaeological reflections on a world gone mad, in Rainbird, Hamilakis, (ed.): 113–14.
Hamilakis, Y. 2001. Interrogating archaeological pedagogies, in Rainbird, & Hamilakis, (ed.): 514.
Malone, C. 2000. Editorial, Antiquity 74: 741–8.
Nuthall, K., Warden, R. & Jobbins, D.. 2002. EU close to fixing quality standard, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 1 March.
Rainbird, P. & Hamilakis, Y. (ed.) 2001. Interrogating pedagogies: archaeology in higher education. Oxford: Archaeopress. British Archaeological Reports. International series S948.
Shore, C. & Wright, S.. 1999. Audit culture and anthropology: neo-liberalism in British higher education, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute n.s. 5: 557–75.
Weitzman, D. 2001. Settling the score, Times Higher Education Supplement 6 July.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed