Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Reject or revive? The crisis of cultural taxonomy in the European Upper Palaeolithic and beyond

  • Natasha Reynolds (a1) and Felix Riede (a2)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Reject or revive? The crisis of cultural taxonomy in the European Upper Palaeolithic and beyond
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Reject or revive? The crisis of cultural taxonomy in the European Upper Palaeolithic and beyond
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Reject or revive? The crisis of cultural taxonomy in the European Upper Palaeolithic and beyond
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. To view the full text please use the links above to select your preferred format.

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence (Email: natasha.reynolds@u-bordeaux.fr)

References

Hide All
Araujo, A.G.M. 2015. On vastness and variability: cultural transmission, historicity, and the Paleoindian record in Eastern South America. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 87: 1239–58. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140219
Barton, C.M. & Neeley, M.P.. 1996. Phantom cultures of the Levantine Epipaleolithic. Antiquity 70: 139–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00082995
Cook, K., Çakirlar, C., Goddard, T., DeMuth, R.C. & Wells, J.. 2018. Teaching open science: published data and digital literacy in archaeology classrooms. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6: 144–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2018.5
Friman, B. 1996. Does the Kongemose Culture exist? About the concept of culture. Archaeologia Polona 34: 143–63.
Marwick, B. 2019. Galisonian logic devices and data availability: revitalising Upper Palaeolithic cultural taxonomies. Antiquity 93: 1365–67. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.131
McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B.A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C.K., Spies, J.R., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K.H. & Yarkoni, T.. 2016. How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife 5: e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800
Neeley, M.P. & Barton, C.M.. 1994. A new approach to interpreting Late Pleistocene microlith industries in Southwest Asia. Antiquity 68: 275–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00046585
Scerri, E.M.L. 2019. Cultural taxonomy for the European Upper Palaeolithic: a wide-ranging problem. Antiquity 93: 1362–64. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.135
Shea, J.J. 2014. Sink the Mousterian? Named stone tool industries (NASTIES) as obstacles to investigating hominin evolutionary relationships in the Later Middle Paleolithic Levant. Quaternary International 350: 169–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.01.024
Shea, J.J. 2019. European Upper Palaeolithic cultural taxa: better off without them? Antiquity 93: 1359–61. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.117

Reject or revive? The crisis of cultural taxonomy in the European Upper Palaeolithic and beyond

  • Natasha Reynolds (a1) and Felix Riede (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed