Skip to main content
×
Home

Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel's edge

  • Åsa Berggren (a1), Nicolo Dell’Unto (a1), Maurizio Forte (a2), Scott Haddow (a3), Ian Hodder (a4), Justine Issavi (a4), Nicola Lercari (a5), Camilla Mazzucato (a3), Allison Mickel (a4) and James S. Taylor (a6)...
Abstract
Abstract

Excavations at Çatalhöyük have been ongoing for over 20 years and have involved multi-national teams, a diverse range of archaeological specialists and a vast archive of records. The task of marshalling this data so that it can be useful not only at the post-excavation stage, but also while making decisions in the field, is challenging. Here, members of the team reflect on the use of digital technology on-site to promote a reflexive engagement with the archaeology. They explore how digital data in a fieldwork context can break down communication barriers between specialists, foster an inclusive approach to the excavation process and facilitate reflexive engagement with recording and interpretation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence (Email: ajmickel@stanford.edu)
References
Hide All
Agisoft . 2014. Agisoft Photoscan. Available at: http://www.agisoft.com (accessed 4 December 2014).
Atalay S. 2010. ‘We don't talk about Çatalhöyük, we live it’: sustainable archaeological practice through community-based participatory research. World Archaeology 42: 418–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2010.497394
Atalay S. 2012. Community-based archaeology: research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Atalay S. In press. Community-based archaeology at Çatalhöyük: participatory planning in cultural tourism, heritage management, and community development, in Hodder I. (ed.) Integrating Çatalhöyük: themes from the 2000–2008 season. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.
Bartu A. 2000. Where is Çatalhöyük? Multiple sites in the construction of an archaeological site, in Hodder I. (ed.) Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük: 101–10. Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research.
Bender B., Hamilton S. & Tilley C.Y.. 2007. Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Berggren Å. 2001. Swedish archaeology in perspective and the possibility of reflexivity. Current Swedish Archaeology 9: 923.
Berggren Å. & Hodder I.. 2003. Social practice, method, and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity 68: 421–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3557102
Berggren Å. & Nilsson B.. In press. Going back, looking forward: reflexive archaeology or reflexive method?, in Hodder I. (ed.) Integrating Çatalhöyük: themes from the 2000–2008 season. Los Angeles (CA): British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.
Callieri M., Dell’Unto N., Dellepiane M., Scopigno R., Soderberg B. & Larsson L.. 2011. Documentation and interpretation of an archaeological excavation: an experience with dense stereo matching, in Artusi A. & Fellner D. (ed.) VAST: the 11th international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology and cultural heritage: 3340. Goslar: Eurographics Association.
Carver G. 2011. Reflections on the archaeology of archaeological excavation. Archaeological Dialogues 18: 1826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000067
Carver M.O.H. 2009. Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge.
Carver M.O.H. 2011. Making archaeology happen: design versus dogma. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Castaneda Q.E. 2008. The ‘ethnographic turn’ in archaeology: research positioning and reflexivity in ethnographic archaeologies, in Castaneda Q.E. & Matthews C.N. (ed.) Ethnographic archaeologies: reflections on stakeholders and archaeological practices: 2562. Lanham (MD): Altamira.
Chadwick A. 1998. Archaeology at the edge of chaos: further towards reflexive excavation methodologies. Assemblage 3: 97117.
Chadwick A. 2003. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies: towards reflective and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues 10: 97117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203803001107
Dellepiane M., Dell’Unto N., Callieri M., Lindgren S. & Scopigno R.. 2013. Archeological excavation monitoring using dense stereo matching techniques. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14: 201–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.011
Dell’Unto N. 2014. The use of 3D models for intra-site investigation in archaeology, in Campana S. & Remondino F. (ed.) 3D surveying and modeling in archaeology and cultural heritage: theory and best practices (British Archaeological Reports international series 2598). Oxford: Archaeopress.
DeTore K. & Bria R.E.. 2013. Explorations in digital data collection in the remote Andes of Peru. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Honolulu, 3–7 April 2013.
Earl G. 2013. Modeling in archaeology: computer graphic and other digital pasts. Perspectives on Science 21: 226–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00096
Edgeworth M. (ed.). 2006. Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations. Lanham (CA): Altamira.
Ellis S. & Wallrodt J.. 2012. Pompeii and the iPad: an update. Paper presented at the 2012 Computer Applications in Archaeology conference, Southampton, 26–29 March 2012.
ESRI. 2012. Multipatches. ArcGIS Resource Center. Available at: http://help.arcgis.com/en%20/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//00q8000000mv000000 (accessed 4 December 2014).
Esteva M., Trelogan J., Rabinowitz A., Walling D. & Pipkin S.. 2010. From the site to long-term preservation: a reflexive system to manage and archive digital archaeological data. Archiving Conference 2010 (1): 16.
Forte M., Dell’Unto N., Issavi J., Onsurez L. & Lercari N.. 2012. 3D archaeology at Çatalhöyük. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1: 351–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.1.3.351
Grossner K., Hodder I., Meeks E. & Engel C.. 2014. A living archive for Çatalhöyük. Poster presented at the 2014 Computer Applications in Archaeology conference, Paris, 22–25 April 2014.
Hamilton C. 2000. Faultlines: the construction of archaeological knowledge at Çatalhöyük, in Hodder I. (ed.) Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük: 119–28. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Hodder I. 1997. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity 71: 691700.
Hodder I. 2000a. Developing a reflexive method in archaeology, in Hodder I. (ed.) Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük: 314. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Hodder I. 2000b. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Hodder I. 2003. Archaeological reflexivity and the “local” voice. Anthropological Quarterly 76 (1): 5569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/anq.2003.0010
Hodder I. 2005. Reflexive methods, in Maschner H.D.G. & Chippindale C. (ed.) Handbook of archaeological methods: 643–49. New York: Altamira.
Levy T.E. 2013. Cyber-archaeology and world cultural heritage: insights from the Holy Land. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences 66: 2633.
Levy T.E., Tuttle C.A., Vincent M., Holland M., Richter A.M., Petrovic V. & Kuester F.. 2013. The 2012 Petra cyber-archaeology cultural conservation expedition: Temple of the Winged Lions and environs, Jordan. Antiquity 87 (335 Project Gallery). Available at: http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/levy335/ (accessed 4 December 2014).
Mickel A. In press. Reasons for redundancy in reflexivity: the role of diaries in archaeological epistemology. Journal of Field Archaeology.
Moser S., Atalay S., Camurcoglu-Cleere D., Hodder I., Orbasli A. & Pye E.. 2010. Protecting and exhibiting Çatalhöyük. Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Cultural Inventory 8: 155–66.
Perry S. 2013. Debating the legacy of postprocessualism: visual reflexivity at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Paper presented at the Institute for Archaeologists conference, Birmingham, 17–19 April 2013.
Silliman S.W. (ed.). 2008. Collaborating at the trowel's edge: teaching and learning in indigenous archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Spence C. 1993. Recording the archaeology of London: the development and implementation of the DUA recording system, in Harris E.C., Brown M.R. III & Brown G.J. (ed.) Practices of archaeological stratigraphy: 2346. London: Academic Press.
Swogger J. 2000. Image and interpretation: the tyranny of representation?, in Hodder I. (ed.) Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük: 143–52. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Tringham R. & Stevanović M. (ed.). 2012. Last house on the hill: BACH area reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
Verhoeven G. 2011. Taking computer vision aloft: archaeological three dimensional reconstruction from aerial photographs with photoscan. Archaeological Prospection 18: 6773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.399
Yalman N. 2005. Ethnoarchaeology, analogy, and problems. Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia: 15–26.
Yarrow T. 2003. Artefactual persons: the relational capacities of persons and things in the practice of excavation. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36: 6573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293650307296
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 227 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 718 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.