Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel's edge

  • Åsa Berggren (a1), Nicolo Dell’Unto (a1), Maurizio Forte (a2), Scott Haddow (a3), Ian Hodder (a4), Justine Issavi (a4), Nicola Lercari (a5), Camilla Mazzucato (a3), Allison Mickel (a4) and James S. Taylor (a6)...
Abstract
Abstract

Excavations at Çatalhöyük have been ongoing for over 20 years and have involved multi-national teams, a diverse range of archaeological specialists and a vast archive of records. The task of marshalling this data so that it can be useful not only at the post-excavation stage, but also while making decisions in the field, is challenging. Here, members of the team reflect on the use of digital technology on-site to promote a reflexive engagement with the archaeology. They explore how digital data in a fieldwork context can break down communication barriers between specialists, foster an inclusive approach to the excavation process and facilitate reflexive engagement with recording and interpretation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence (Email: ajmickel@stanford.edu)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Atalay 2010. ‘We don't talk about Çatalhöyük, we live it’: sustainable archaeological practice through community-based participatory research. World Archaeology 42: 418–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2010.497394

M. Dellepiane , N. Dell’Unto , M. Callieri , S. Lindgren & R. Scopigno . 2013. Archeological excavation monitoring using dense stereo matching techniques. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14: 201–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.011

G. Earl 2013. Modeling in archaeology: computer graphic and other digital pasts. Perspectives on Science 21: 226–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00096

M. Forte , N. Dell’Unto , J. Issavi , L. Onsurez & N. Lercari . 2012. 3D archaeology at Çatalhöyük. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1: 351–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.1.3.351

I. Hodder 2003. Archaeological reflexivity and the “local” voice. Anthropological Quarterly 76 (1): 5569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/anq.2003.0010

C. Spence 1993. Recording the archaeology of London: the development and implementation of the DUA recording system, in E.C. Harris , M.R. Brown III & G.J. Brown (ed.) Practices of archaeological stratigraphy: 2346. London: Academic Press.

G. Verhoeven 2011. Taking computer vision aloft: archaeological three dimensional reconstruction from aerial photographs with photoscan. Archaeological Prospection 18: 6773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.399

T. Yarrow 2003. Artefactual persons: the relational capacities of persons and things in the practice of excavation. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36: 6573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293650307296

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 182 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 578 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.