Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:01:36.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a nonlinear hydromagnetic convection under a rotational constraint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

N. Riahi
N. Riahi
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles, California 90024 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nonlinear hydromagnetic convection in a horizontal layer of fluid rotating about the vertical axis is investigated using the mean field approximation. The boundary layer method is used assuming large Rayleigh number R for different ranges of the Chandrasekhar number Q and the Taylor number Ta. The heat flux F is determined for the value of the horizontal wave number α which maximizes F. It is shown that, for certain regions of the parameter space (R, Q, Ta), F and α change discontinuously for Ta greater than some critical value (given R and Q). Thus, for Ta about this critical value, wave numbers and heat fluxes of two different values will be predicted simultaneously. Also, for certian regions of the parameter space, the field can facilitate convection, but rotation can facilitate convection only for sufficiently large Ta.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 161 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1980

References

[1]Busse, F. H., “On the mean field problem of thermal convection/Max-Planck Inst. Phys. Astrophs. Rep. MP1-PAE/Astro 31 (1970), 1–31.Google Scholar
[2]Chan, S. K., “Infinite Prandtl number turbulent convection”, Studies in Appl. Math. 50 (1971), 13–49.Google Scholar
[3]Chan, S. K., “Investigation of turbulent convection under a rotational constraint”, J. Fluid Mech. 64 (1974), 477–506.Google Scholar
[4]Chandrasekhar, S., Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability (Oxford Univeristy Press, 1961), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
[5]Herring, J. R., “Investigation of problems in thermal convection”, J. Atmos. Sci. 20 (1963), 325–338.Google Scholar
[6]Howard, L. N., “Notes from summer study program in geophysical fluid dynamics”, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst. 1 (1965).Google Scholar
[7]Hunter, C. and Riahi, N., “Nonlinear convection in a rotating fluid”, J. Fluid Mech. 72 (1975), 433–454.Google Scholar
[8]Riahi, N., “Upper-bound problem for a rotating system”, J. Fluid Mech. 81 (1977), 523–528.Google Scholar
[9]Riahi, N., “Some predictions from the mean-field equations of magneto-convection”, Aust. J. Phys. (1980) (in press).Google Scholar
[10]Van der Borght, R., Murphy, J. O. and Spiegel, E. A., “On magnetic inhibition of thermal convection”, Aust. J. Phys. 25 (1972), 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Van der Borght, R. and Murphy, J. O., “The combined effect of rotation and magnetic field on finite-amplitude thermal convection”, Aust. J. Phys. 26 (1973), 617–643.Google Scholar