Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 22
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Riede, Felix Andersen, Per and Price, Neil 2016. Does environmental archaeology need an ethical promise?. World Archaeology, p. 1.


    Berliner, Kelley M. and Nassaney, Michael S. 2015. The Role of the Public in Public Archaeology: Ten Years of Outreach and Collaboration at Fort St. Joseph. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 3.


    Ingram, Scott E. and Gilpin, Dennis 2015. Southwestern Archaeology Beyond Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future. KIVA, Vol. 81, Issue. 1-2, p. 120.


    Mickel, Allison and Knodell, Alex R. 2015. We wanted to take real information: public engagement and regional survey at Petra, Jordan. World Archaeology, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 239.


    Randall, Asa R. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Wurst, LouAnn 2015. Toward a Collective Historical Archaeology. Reviews in Anthropology, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 118.


    Isendahl, Christian Dunning, Nicholas P. and Sabloff, Jeremy A. 2014. 4 Growth and Decline in Classic Maya Puuc Political Economies. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 43.


    Wurst, LouAnn and Mrozowski, Stephen A. 2014. Toward an Archaeology of the Future. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 210.


    LeFebvre, Michelle J. 2013. Protecting Heritage in the Caribbean. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 311.


    Stump, Daryl 2013. On Applied Archaeology, Indigenous Knowledge, and the Usable Past. Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, Issue. 3, p. 268.


    Zarger, Rebecca K. and Pluckhahn, Thomas J. 2013. Assessing Methodologies in Archaeological Ethnography: A Case for Incorporating Ethnographic Training in Graduate Archaeology Curricula. Public Archaeology, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 48.


    2013. COMMON GROUND. Near Eastern Archaeology, Vol. 76, Issue. 3, p. 152.


    Davies, Matthew I. J. 2012. Some Thoughts on a ‘Useable’ African Archaeology: Settlement, Population and Intensive Farming among the Pokot of Northwest Kenya. African Archaeological Review, Vol. 29, Issue. 4, p. 319.


    Sipahi, Ali 2012. Unearthing the Ottoman present. New Perspectives on Turkey, Vol. 47, p. 211.


    Agbe-Davies, Anna S. 2011. Inside/Outside, Upside Down: Including Archaeologists in Communities. Archaeologies, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 574.


    Dennison, Jean 2011. Our Heritage, Our Future. Heritage & Society, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 9.


    Harrison, Rodney 2011. Archaeologies ‘now’. Creative interventions in the present for the future. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 18, Issue. 02, p. 180.


    Solli, Brit Burström, Mats Domanska, Ewa Edgeworth, Matt González-Ruibal, Alfredo Holtorf, Cornelius Lucas, Gavin Oestigaard, Terje Smith, Laurajane and Witmore, Christopher 2011. Some Reflections on Heritage and Archaeology in the Anthropocene. Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 40.


    Fushiya, Tomomi 2010. Archaeological Site Management and Local Involvement: A Case Study from Abu Rawash, Egypt. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 324.


    Gramsch, Alexander 2010. Different languages. An interview on archaeology in Germany with Friedrich Lüth. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 17, Issue. 02, p. 199.


    ×

Millennial archaeology. Locating the discipline in the age of insecurity

Abstract
Abstract

This discussion article responds to a forum question posed by the editors of Archaeological dialogues: ‘is archaeology useful?’ My response initially moves backward from the question, considering whether archaeology ought to be useful, how it has been useful in the past, and the millennial overtones of the question in our present climate of crisis. I critique the primary way in which archaeology attempts to be useful, as a dowsing rod for heritage through ‘public archaeology’. While European archaeology has long been aware of the dangers of nationalism, in the Americas this danger is cloaked by a focus on indigenous and minority histories. I then move forward through the question and urge colleagues to embrace an archaeological agenda geared towards the future rather than the past. My hope is that transatlantic dialogue will be politically useful in reorienting archaeological research towards supranational problems such as climate change, hunger and population stress.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Archaeological Dialogues
  • ISSN: 1380-2038
  • EISSN: 1478-2294
  • URL: /core/journals/archaeological-dialogues
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: