Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    McAtackney, Laura and Penrose, Sefryn 2016. The contemporary in post-medieval archaeology. Post-Medieval Archaeology, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 148.

    Nativ, Assaf 2016. No Compensation Needed: On Archaeology and the Archaeological. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory,

    Lucas, Gavin 2015. Archaeology and contemporaneity. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 22, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Woodward, Sophie 2015. Intimacies, Critical Consumption and Diverse Economies.

    Arnshav, Mirja 2014. The Freedom of the Seas: Untapping the Archaeological Potential of Marine Debris. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Barendse, Joan-Mari 2014. Artefaktuele geheue in Alastair Bruce se post-apokaliptiese romanWall of Days. Journal of Literary Studies, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 78.

    Crea, Gillian Dafnis, Andrew Hallam, Jane Kiddey, Rachael and Schofield, John 2014. Turbo Island, Bristol: excavating a contemporary homeless place. Post-Medieval Archaeology, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 133.

    Nemser, Daniel 2014. Archaeology in the Lettered City. Colonial Latin American Review, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 197.

    Pearson, Mike and Roms, Heike 2014. Performing Cities.

    Williams, Howard 2014. Monument and material reuse at the National Memorial Arboretum. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 21, Issue. 01, p. 75.

    2014. Notes and News. Post-Medieval Archaeology, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 253.

    McGuire, Randall H. 2013. Steel Walls and Picket Fences: Rematerializing the U.S.-Mexican Border in Ambos Nogales. American Anthropologist, Vol. 115, Issue. 3, p. 466.

    BROWN, STEVE 2012. Toward an archaeology of the twentieth-century suburban backyard. Archaeology in Oceania, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 99.

    Corkill, Claire and Moore, Ray 2012. ‘The Island of Blood’: death and commemoration at the Isle of Man TT Races. World Archaeology, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 248.

    Pétursdóttir, Þóra 2012. Small Things Forgotten Now Included, or What Else Do Things Deserve?. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 577.

    Sipahi, Ali 2012. Unearthing the Ottoman present. New Perspectives on Turkey, Vol. 47, p. 211.

    Graves-Brown, Paul 2011. Touching from a Distance: Alienation, Abjection, Estrangement and Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 131.


Surface assemblages. Towards an archaeology in and of the present


This paper explores a central paradox in the aims of the archaeology of the contemporary past as they have been articulated by its practitioners. On the one hand, its aim has been expressed as one of making the familiar ‘unfamiliar’, of distancing the observer from their own material world; a work of alienation. On the other hand, it has also aimed to make the past more accessible and egalitarian; to recover lost, subaltern voices and in this way to close the distance between past and present. I suggest that this paradox has stymied its development and promoted a culture of self-justification for a subfield which has already become well established within archaeology over the course of three decades. I argue that this paradox arises from archaeology's relationship with modernity and the past itself, as a result of its investment in the modernist trope of archaeology-as-excavation and the idea of a past which is buried and hidden. One way of overcoming this paradox would be to emphasize an alternative trope of archaeology-as-surface-survey and a process of assembling/reassembling, and indeed to shift away from the idea of an ‘archaeology of the contemporary past’ to speak instead of an archaeology ‘in and of the present’. This would reorient archaeology so that it is seen primarily as a creative engagement with the present and only subsequently as a consideration of the intervention of traces of the past within it. It is only by doing this that archaeology will develop into a discipline which can successfully address itself to the present and future concerns of contemporary societies. Such a move not only has implications for archaeologies of the present and recent past, but concerns the very nature and practice of archaeology as a discipline in its broadest sense in the 21st century.

Corresponding author
*Rodney Harrison, The Open University. Email:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Archaeological Dialogues
  • ISSN: 1380-2038
  • EISSN: 1478-2294
  • URL: /core/journals/archaeological-dialogues
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *