Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Understanding objects in motion. An archaeological dialogue on Romanization

  • Miguel John Versluys
Abstract

This essay argues that Romanization revolves around understanding objects in motion and that Roman archaeologists should therefore focus on (1) globalization theory and (2) material-culture studies as important theoretical directions for the (near) future. The present state and scope of the Romanization debate, however, seem to prevent a fruitful development in that direction. The first part of this paper therefore briefly analyses the Romanization debate and argues that large parts of ‘Anglo-Saxon Roman archaeology’ have never been really post-colonial, but in fact from the mid-1990s onwards developed a theoretical position that should be characterized as anti-colonial. This ideologically motivated development has resulted in several unhealthy divides within the field, as well as in an uncomfortable ending of the Romanization debate. The present consensus within English-speaking Roman archaeology ‘to do away with Romanization’ does not seem to get us at all ‘beyond Romans and Natives’, and, moreover, has effectively halted most of the discussion about how to understand and conceptualize ‘Rome’. The second part of the article presents two propositions outlining how to move forward: globalization theory and material-culture studies. Through this focus we will be able to better understand ‘Rome’ as (indicating) objects in motion and the human–thing entanglements resulting from a remarkable punctuation of connectivity. This focus is important as an alternative perspective to all existing narratives about Romanization because these remain fundamentally historical, in the sense that they reduce objects to expressions (of identity) alone. It is time for our discussions about ‘Rome’ to move ‘beyond representation’ and to become genuinely archaeological at last, by making material culture, with its agency and materiality, central to the analyses.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Miguel John Versluys, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, NL. Email: m.j.versluys@arch.leidenuniv.nl.
References
Hide All
Alcock, S. (ed.), 1997: The early Roman Empire in the East, Oxford.
Alexandridis, A., 2010: Neutral bodies? Female portrait statue types from the late Republic to the second century AD, in Hodos, T. and Hales, S. (eds), Material culture and social identities in the ancient world, Cambridge, 252–79.
Appadurai, A. (ed.), 2001: Globalization, Durham, NC.
Ball, W., 2000: Rome in the East. The transformation of an empire, London.
Bénabou, M., 1976: La résistance africaine à la romanisation, Paris.
Bhabha, H., 1994: The location of culture, London.
Bloch, M., 1953: Apologie pour l'histoire, ou le métier historien, Paris.
Böhme, H., 2006: Fetischismus und Kultur. Eine andere Theorie der Moderne, Hamburg.
Boivin, N., 2008: Material cultures, material minds. The impact of things on human thought, society, and culture, Oxford.
Braudel, F., 1966 (1949): La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe II, Paris.
Butcher, K., 2003: Roman Syria and the Near East, Los Angeles.
Cannadine, D., 2013: The undivided past. History beyond our differences, London.
Carey, J.W., 1989: Communication as culture. Essays on media and society, New York.
Dench, E., 2005: Romulus’ asylum. Roman identities from the age of Alexander to the age of Hadrian, Oxford.
Dupont, F., 2002: Rome ou l'altérité incluse, Rue Descartes 37, 4154.
Edwards, C., and Woolf, G., 2003: Rome the cosmopolis, Cambridge.
Flood, F.B., 2009: Objects of translation. Material culture and Medieval ‘Hindu–Muslim’ encounter, Princeton and Oxford.
Gardner, A., 2013: Thinking about Roman imperialism. Postcolonialism, globalisation and beyond?, Britannia 44, 125.
Gibson, M., 2007: Culture and power. A history of cultural studies, Oxford.
Gosden, C., 2004: Archaeology and colonialism. Culture contact from 5000 BC to the present, Cambridge.
Gosden, C., 2012: Post-colonial archaeology, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory today, Cambridge, 251–66.
Häussler, R. (ed.), 2008: Romanisation et épigraphie. Etudes interdisciplinaires sur l'acculturation et l'identité dans l'Empire romain, Montagnac.
Hicks, D., 2010: The material-cultural turn. Event and effect, in Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M.C. (eds), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies, Oxford, 2598.
Hicks, D., and Beaudry, M.C. (eds), 2010: The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford.
Hingley, R., 2000: Roman officers and English gentlemen, London.
Hingley, R. (ed.), 2001: Images of Rome. Perceptions of ancient Rome in Europe and the United States in the modern age, Ann Arbor (Journal of Roman archaeology, Supplementary Series 44).
Hingley, R., 2005: Globalizing Roman culture. Unity, diversity and empire, London.
Hingley, R., 2014b: Post-colonial and global Rome. The genealogy of empire, in Pitts, M. and Versluys, M.J. (eds.), Globalisation and the Roman world. Perspectives and opportunities, Cambridge, forthcoming.
Hodder, I., 2012: Entangled. An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things, Oxford.
Hoff, M.C., and Rotroff, S., 1997: The Romanization of Athens, Oxford.
Hölscher, T., 2004: The language of images in Roman art, Cambridge.
Horden, P., and Purcell, N., 2000: The corrupting sea. A study of Mediterranean history, Oxford.
Jones, A.M., and Boivin, N., 2010: The malice of inanimate objects. Material agency, in Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M.C. (eds), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies, Oxford, 333–51.
Knappett, C., and Malafouris, L. (eds), 2008: Material agency. Towards a non-anthropocentric approach, New York.
Laurence, R., 2001: Roman narratives. The writing of archaeological discourse – a view from Britain?, Archaeological dialogues 8, 90122 (with comments by A. Snodgrass, M.J. Versluys and D. Krause).
Le Bohec, Y., 2008: Romanisation ou romanité au temps du principat. Question de méthodologie, Revue des études latines 86, 127–38.
Leerssen, J., 2007: Imagology. History and method, in Beller, M. and Leerssen, J. (eds), Imagology. The cultural construction and literary representation of national characters. A critical survey, Amsterdam, 1732.
Le Roux, P., 1995: Rome ou l'acculturation permanente, Crises 5, 125–31.
Le Roux, P., 2004: La romanisation en question, Annales. Histoire, sciences sociales 59 (2), 287311.
Leveau, B., 1984: Caesarea de Maurétanie. Une ville romaine et ses campagnes, Rome.
McCaskie, T.C., 2012: ‘As on a darkling plain’. Practitioners, publics, propagandists, and ancient historiography, Comparative studies in society and history 54 (1), 145–73.
Malafouris, L., 2004: The cognitive basis of material engagement. Where brain, body and culture conflate, in DeMarrias, E., Gosden, C. and Renfrew, C. (eds), Rethinking materiality. The engagement of mind with the material world, Cambridge, 5362.
Maran, J., and Stockhammer, P.W. (eds), 2012: Materiality and social practice. Transformative capacities of intercultural encounters, Oxford.
Mattingly, D.J. (ed.), 1997: Dialogues in Roman imperialism. Power, discourse, and discrepant experience in the Roman Empire, Ann Arbor.
Mattingly, D.J., 2004: Being Roman. Expressing identity in a provincial setting, Journal of Roman archaeology 17, 525.
Mattingly, D.J., 2006: An imperial possession. Britain in the Roman Empire, 54 BC–AD 409, London.
Mattingly, D.J., 2007: What did the Romans do for us?, History today 57 (6).
Mattingly, D.J., 2010: Imperialism, power and identity. Experiencing the Roman Empire, Princeton.
Merryweather, A., and Prag, J., 2002: ‘Romanization’? or, why flogging a dead horse, Disgressus 2, 810.
Millett, M., 1990: The Romanization of Britain. An essay in archaeological interpretation, Cambridge.
Mol, E.M., 2012: The perception of Egypt in networks of being and becoming. A thing theory approach to egyptianising objects in Roman domestic contexts, in TRAC Proceedings 2012, Oxford, 117–31.
Morris, I., 2005: Mediterraneanization, in Malkin, I. (ed.), Mediterranean paradigms and classical antiquity, London, 3055.
Osborne, R., 2008: Colonial cancer, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 21 (2), 281–84.
Pippidi, D.M. (ed.), 1976: Assimilation et résistance à la culture gréco-romaine dans le monde ancien, Paris.
Pitts, M., 2007: The emperor's new clothes? The unity of identity in Roman archaeology, American journal of archaeology 111, 693713.
Pitts, M., 2008: Globalizing the local in Roman Britain. An anthropological approach to social change, Journal of anthropological archaeology 27, 493506.
Reece, R., 1990: Romanization. A point of view, in Blag, T.F.C. and Millett, M. (eds), The early Roman Empire in the West, Oxford, 130–40.
Roth, R., and Keller, J. (eds), 2007: Roman by integration. Dimensions of group identity in material culture and text, Ann Arbor (Journal of Roman archaeology, Supplementary Series 66).
Saurma-Jeltsch, L.E., and Eisenbeiß, A. (eds), 2010: The power of things and the flow of cultural transformations. Art and culture between Europe and Asia, Heidelberg.
Slofstra, J., 1983: An anthropological approach to the study of Romanization processes, in Brandt, R. and Slofstra, J. (eds), Roman and Native in the Low Countries. Spheres of interaction, Oxford (BAR International Series 184), 71104.
Slofstra, J., 2002b: Story-telling and theory. A reply, Archaeological dialogues 9, 5557.
Sommer, M., 2012: Heart of darkness? Post-colonial theory and the transformation of the Mediterranean, Ancient West & East 11, 235–45.
Stek, T.D., 2009: Cult places and cultural change in Republican Italy. A contextual approach to religious aspects of rural society after the Roman conquest, Amsterdam.
Terrenato, N., 2001: Ancestor cults. The perception of Rome in modern Italian culture, in Hingley, R. (ed.), Images of Rome. Perceptions of ancient Rome in Europe and the United States in the modern age, Ann Arbor, 7189.
Terrenato, N., 2005: The deceptive archetype. Roman colonization in Italy and post-colonial thought, in Hurst, H. and Owen, S. (eds), Ancient colonizations. Analogy, similarity and difference, London, 5972.
Terrenato, N., 2007: The clans and the peasants. Reflections on social structure and change in Hellenistic Central Italy, in van Dommelen, P. and Terrenato, N. (eds), Articulating local cultures, Portsmouth, RI, 1322.
Thomas, N., 1999: The case of the misplaced ponchos. Speculations concerning the history of cloth in Polynesia, Journal of material culture 4, 520.
Van Dommelen, P., 1998: On colonial grounds. A comparative study of colonialism and rural settlement in first millennium BC west central Sardinia, Leiden.
Van Dommelen, P., 2006: Colonial matters. Material culture and postcolonial theory in colonial situations, in Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuechler-Fogden, S., Rowlands, M. and Spyer, P. (eds), Handbook of material culture, Los Angeles, 104–24.
Van Dommelen, P., 2012: Colonialism and migration in the ancient Mediterranean, Annual review of anthropology 41, 393409.
Van Dommelen, P., and Knapp, A.B. (eds), 2010: Material connections in the ancient Mediterranean. Mobility, materiality and identity, London.
Van Oyen, A., 2013: Towards a post-colonial artefact analysis, Archaeological dialogues 20 (1), 87107.
Versluys, M.J., 2010–11: Archéologie classique et histoire de l'art aux Pays-Bas. Des liaisons dangereuses, Perspective, 687–701.
Versluys, M.J., 2012: Cultural responses from kingdom to province. The Romanisation of Commagene, local identities and the Mara bar Sarapion letter, in Merz, A. and Tieleman, T. (eds), The letter of Mara Bar Sarapion in context, Leiden, 4366.
Versluys, M.J., 2013: Material culture and identity in the late Roman Republic (ca. 200 BC–ca. 20 BC), in de Rose Evans, J. (ed.), Blackwell companion to the archaeology of the Roman Republic, Oxford, 647–62.
Versluys, M.J., 2014: Roman visual material culture as globalising koine, in Pitts, M. and Versluys, M.J. (eds), Globalisation and the Roman world, Cambridge, forthcoming.
Veyne, P., 2005: L'empire gréco-romain, Paris.
Wallace-Hadrill, A., 2008: Rome's cultural revolution, Cambridge.
Webster, J., and Cooper, N. (eds), 1996: Roman imperialism: Post-colonial perspectives, Leicester (Leicester Archaeology Monographs 3).
Weinstein, B., 2005: History without a cause? Grand narratives, world history, and the postcolonial dilemma, International review of social history 50, 7193.
Witcher, R.E., 2000: Globalisation and Roman imperialism, in Herring, E. and Lomas, K. (eds), The emergence of state identities in Italy in the first millennium, London, 213–25.
Wolf, E., 1982: Europe and the people without history, Berkeley.
Woolf, G., 1997: Beyond Romans and Natives, World archaeology 28, 339–50.
Woolf, G., 1998: Becoming Roman. The origins of provincial civilization in Gaul, Cambridge.
Woolf, G., 2001: The Roman cultural revolution in Gaul, in Keay, S. and Terrenato, N. (eds), Italy and the West. Comparative issues in Romanization, Oxford, 173–86.
Woolf, G., 2004: The present state and future scope of Roman archaeology. A comment, American journal of archaeology 108, 417–28.
Woolf, G., 2012: Rome. An empire's story, Oxford.
Zanker, P. (ed.), 1976: Hellenismus in Mittelitalien, Göttingen.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Archaeological Dialogues
  • ISSN: 1380-2038
  • EISSN: 1478-2294
  • URL: /core/journals/archaeological-dialogues
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed