We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2022
Although reading lists are an important part of curricula and play an essential role in decolonizing education, the work to diversify them can often neglect intersectional approaches that consider both racialized and gendered dimensions of knowledge construction. The consequence can be an additive approach in which black authors and authors of colour are included to diversify reading lists, reproducing racist and sexist biases. This paper examines how reading lists are constructed in curricula and presents an alternative decolonial feminist approach to creating a reading list in fashion design. The value of decolonial feminism lies in addressing the gaps in thinking by using a racialized and gendered framework. The Decolonizing the Curriculum Toolkit project at Westminster University, UK is introduced to which the author contributed a Decolonising Fashion Design Reading List, as an example of counter-hegemonic curricula which aimed to reveal the unequal power dynamics that support colonial logics in fashion design education. Exposing hegemonic distinctions in fashion that represent Western fashion as modern and non-Western fashion as traditional can then allow marginalized and excluded fashion narratives to become centred. Such an approach can then provide a key tool towards building a more pluralised and de-hierarchised set of fashion design resources.
1. Crilly, Jess, Panesar, Lucy and Suka-Bill, Zey, “Co-constructing a Liberated / Decolonised Arts Curriculum,” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 17(2), 2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss2/9.
2. “UAL So White,” 2015, accessed 21 February 2018, https://ualsowhite.tumblr.com.
3. “The Little Book of Case Studies: People of Colour,” Shades of Noir, 2017, accessed 17 June 2019, http:// education.shadesofnoir.org.uk/people-ofcolour/.
4. de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide (New York: Routledge, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5. Bhambra, Gurminder K., Gebrial, Dalia and Nişancıoğlu, Kerem. Decolonising the University (London: Pluto Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
6. “Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Attainment at YK Universities: #Closing the Gap,” accessed October 27 2021, https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/field/downloads/2021-07/bame-student-attainment.pdf.
7. Taboada, Manuela B., Rojas-Lizana, Sol, Dutra, Leo XC, and Levu, Adi VasuLevu M., “Decolonial Design in Practice: Designing Meaningful and Transformative Science Communications for Navakavu, Fiji,” Design and Culture 12, no. 2 (2020): 141-164CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8. de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, The End of the Cognitive Empire. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
9. Vergès, Françoise and Bohrer, Ashley J., Decolonial Feminism (London: Pluto Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10. bell hooks, All About Love: New Visions (New York: William Morrow, 2018).
11. Lugones, María, “Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System,” Hypatia 22, no. 1 (2007): 186-219Google Scholar.
12. Schultz, Tristan, Abdulla, Danah, Ansari, Ahmed, Canlı, Ece, Keshavarz, Mahmoud, Kiem, Matthew, Martins, Luiza Prado de O., and de Oliveira, Pedro JS Vieira, “What is at Stake with Decolonizing Design? A Roundtable,” Design and Culture 10, no. 1 (2018): 81-101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13. Fry, Tony, “Design for/by “The Global South”,” Design Philosophy Papers 15, no. 1 (2017): 3-37, 29Google Scholar.
14. Angela McRobbie, British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry? (New York: Routledge, 2003), 21.
15. Buckley, Cheryl, “Made in Patriarchy: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design,” Design Issues (1986): 3-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16. Sandra Niessen, Ann Marie Leshkowich, Carla Jones, eds. 2003. Re-orienting Fashion: The Globalization of Asian Dress (Oxford: UK, Berg, 2003).
17. Janiki Turaga, “Being Fashionable in India in the Globalisation Era: Holy Writing on Garments” in M. Angela Jansen and Jennifer Craik, eds., Modern Fashion Traditions: Negotiating Tradition and Modernity through Fashion (New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.
18. Dina Torkia, “dinatokio,” Accessed November 17, 2021, https://www.instagram.com/dinatokio.
19. bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress (New York: Routledge, 2014).
20. “Decolonizing the Curriculum Toolkit,” accessed October 14, 2021, https://blogstage.westminster.ac.uk/psj/tools/reading-lists/.
21. Green, Denise Nicole and Kaiser, Susan B., “Fashion and Appropriation,” Fashion, Style & Popular Culture 4, no. 2 (2017): 145-150CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22. Tansy E. Hoskins, Stitched Up: The Anti-Capitalist Book of Fashion, Vol. 254 (London: Pluto Press, 2014).
23. Sarah Cheang, Erica de Greef and Yoko Takagi, eds. Rethinking Fashion Globalization. (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021).
24. Dalea, Roger and Robertson, Susan, “Interview with Boaventura de Sousa Santos,” Globalisation, Societies and Education 2, no. 2 (2004): 147-160CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25. Dina Torkia, Instagram, accessed October 11, 2021, https://www.instagram.com/dinatokio/.
26. Roshni Goyate, Sharan Hunjan, Sheena Patel, and Sunnah Khan, 4 Brown Girls Who Write (London: Rough Trade, 2021).
27. “Singh Street Style,” accessed October 11, 2021, https://singhstreetstyle.co.uk. 2021.
28. Body Beautiful: Diversity on the Catwalk, The National Museum of Scotland, accessed November 17, 2021, //www.nms.ac.uk/national-museum-of-scotland/things-to-see-and-do/past-exhibitions/body-beautiful/, 2019
