Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Keeping Monks in Their Place?

  • Tomas LARSSON (a1)

Abstract

This essay explores the extent to which Thailand’s secular legal system reinforces the imagined divide, common in Thai Buddhist conceptions of society, between a “worldly” sphere and the “religious” sphere of the sangha (order of monks). It asks: How far does secular Thai law exclude clergy from the “unmonkly” domains of politics and commerce? It shows that there is a striking discrepancy between the systematic way in which secular Thai law has kept monks from formally participating in “politics” and the rather more permissive way in which it has facilitated participation by the monkhood in the sphere of “commerce.” The essay concludes with some reflections on this finding and the questions it raises.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Keeping Monks in Their Place?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Keeping Monks in Their Place?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Keeping Monks in Their Place?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
*

Tomas Larsson is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Studies at the University of Cambridge, and Fellow of St John’s College, Cambridge. Correspondence to Tomas Larsson, St John’s College, Cambridge CB2 1TP, United Kingdom. E-mail address: thl33@cam.ac.uk. The author wishes to thank Puli Fuwongcharoen for excellent research assistance and Tom Ginsburg, Jacques Leider, and Benjamin Schonthal for helpful comments.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Areerat, Kongpob (2015) “Junta to Pass Law Banning Homosexuals From Monkhood,” Prachathai, 10 March.
Chansom, Nada (2012) Kanborihan Kanngoen Khong Wat Nai Prathet Thai, Bangkok: Samnak Wichai Sathaban Bandit Phatthana Borihansat.
Heikkilä-Horn, Marja-Leena (2010) “Santi Asoke Buddhism and the Occupation of Bangkok International Airport.” 3 Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 3147.
Hongladarom, Soraj & Hongladarom, Krisadawan (2011) “Cyber-Buddhism: Fundamentalism, the Internet and the Public Sphere in Thailand,” in U. Mårtensson, J. Bailey, P. Ringrose & A. Dyrendal, eds., Fundamentalism in the Modern World, Vol. 2. Fundamentalism and Communication: Culture, Media and the Public Sphere, London: IB Taurus, 216236.
Kitiarsa, Pattana (2007) “Buddha Phanit: Thailand’s Prosperity Religion and Its Commodifying Tactics,” in P. Kitiarsa, ed., Religious Commodification in Asia: Marketing Gods, Abingdon: Routledge, 120143.
Kulabkaew, Katewadee (2013) “In Defense of Buddhism: Thai Sangha’s Social Movement in the Twenty-First Century,” PhD Dissertation, Waseda University.
Larsson, Tomas (2015) “Monkish Politics in Southeast Asia: Religious Disenfranchisement in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective.” 49 Modern Asian Studies 4082.
Larsson, Tomas (2016) “The Buddha or the Ballot: The Buddhist Exception to Universal Suffrage in Contemporary Asia,” in H. Kawanami, ed., Buddhism and the Political Process, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 7896.
Lindberg-Falk, Monica (2007) Making Fields of Merit: Buddhist Female Ascetics and Gendered Orders in Thailand, Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
Lingat, Robert (1937) “Vinaya Et Droit Laïque: Etudes Sur Les Conflits De La Loi Religieuse Et De La Loi Laïque Dans l’Indochine Hinayaniste.” 37 Bulletin De L’Ecole Française D’Extrême-Orient 415477.
Mahathera Samakhom (2007) “Mati Mahathera Samakhom Khrang Thi 20/2550,” 20 September, online <http://mahathera.org/uploaded_pdf/CCF01592551_00012d.pdf> (last accessed 3 May 2015).
Mahathera Samakhom (2014) “Sarup Kanprachum Mahathera Samakhom Khrang Thi 27/2557,” 11 December, online <http://www.mahathera.org/detail.php?module=news&id=184&title=02> (last accessed 3 May 2015).
Matichon (2013) “Thammai ‘Mae Chi Chak Santi Asok’ Chai Sitthi Lueak Tang Mai Day?” [“Why Can’t ‘Nuns From Santi Asoke’ Exercise the Right to Vote?”], 3 March, online <http://www.matichon.co.th/news_detail.php?newsid=1362295307&grpid=01&catid=01> (last accessed 20 June 2013).
McCargo, Duncan (1997) Chamlong Srimuang and the New Thai Politics, London: Hurst.
Orlandini, Barbara (2003) “Consuming ‘Good Governance’ in Thailand.” 15 European Journal of Development Research 1643.
Panich, Vichak (2015) Rat-Tham-Nua, Bangkok: Matichon.
Phasuthanchat, Phiphat (2010) Rat Kap Satsana: Botkhwam Wa Duay Anachak Satsanachak Lae Seriphap, Bangkok: Siam.
Poonyarat, Chayanit (2002) “Thai Nuns Fight for Rights,” Asia Times Online, 19 September.
Prasertponkrung, Jeerapong, & Osathanon, Praphasri (2015) “Uproar Over NRC Panel and Buddhist Reform,” The Nation, 25 February.
Reynolds, Frank E. (1972) “The Two Wheels of Dhamma: A Study of Early Buddhism,” in G. Obeyesekere, F.E. Reynolds & B.L. Smith, eds., The Two Wheels of Dhamma: Essays on the Theravada Tradition, Chambersburg: American Academy of Religion, 630.
Satha-anand, Suwanna (1990) “Religious Movements in Contemporary Thailand: Buddhist Struggles for Modern Relevance.” 30 Asian Survey 395408.
Satha-anand, Suwanna (2003) “Buddhist Pluralism and Religious Tolerance in Democratizing Thailand,” in P. Can, ed., Philosophy, Democracy, and Education, Seoul: Korean National Commission for UNESCO, 193213.
Scott, Rachelle M. (2009) Nirvana for Sale? Buddhism, Wealth, and the Dhammakaya Temple in Contemporary Thailand, Albany: SUNY Press.
Sezgin, Yüksel & Künkler, Mirjam (2014) “Regulation of ‘Religion’ and the ‘Religious’: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia.” 56 Comparative Studies in Society and History 448478.
Streckfuss, David (2010) Truth on Trial in Thailand: Defamation, Treason, and Lèse-Majesté, London: Routledge.
Suwannathat-Pian, Kobkua (2003) Kings, Country and Constitutions: Thailand’s Political Development, 1932–2000, London: Routledge/Curzon.
Thai PBS English News (2013) “AMLO Seizes Defrocked Monk’s Assets,” 20 September, online <http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/amlo-seizes-defrocked-monks-assets> (last accessed 2 December 2015).
Thai Rath (2011) “Mae Chi Woy! Mi Ray Chue Tae Khet Dusit Mai Hai Lueak Tang” [“Nuns Cry Out! Have Names on Register but Dusit District Does Not Allow Vote”], 3 July, online <http://www.thairath.co.th/content/pol/183582> (last accessed 20 June 2013).
Visalo, Phra Phaisan (2003) Phutthasatsana Thai Nai Anakhot: Naewnom Lae Thang Ok Chak Wikrit, Bangkok: Munithi Sotsi-Saritwong.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed