Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-54gsr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T10:59:50.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral momentum and Pavlovian conditioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2005

Randolph C. Grace  and
John A. Nevin
Randolph C. Grace*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
John A. Nevin*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824-3518
*
rgrace@psyc.canterbury.ac.nz
jnevin@cisunix.unh.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The constructs of behavioral mass in research on the momentum of operant behavior and associative strength in Pavlovian conditioning have some interesting parallels, as suggested by Savastano & Miller. Some recent findings challenge the strict separation of operant and Pavlovian determiners of response rate and resistance to change in behavioral momentum, renewing the need for research on the interaction of processes that have traditionally been studied separately. Relatedly, Furedy notes that some autonomic responses may be refractory to conditioning, but a combination of operant contingencies and enriched Pavlovian stimulus-reinforcer relations may prove effective.

Information

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 695 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Commentary on John A. Nevin & Randolph C. Grace (2000). Behavioral momentum and the Law of Effect. BBS 23(1):73–130.

References

Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., Gardner, N. C., Chung, B. I. & Dube, W. V. (2003) Persistence of stereotypic behavior: Examining the effects of external reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36:439–48. [rRCG]10.1901/jaba.2003.36-439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annau, Z. & Kamin, L. J. (1961) The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 54:428–32. [HIS]10.1037/h0042199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capaldi, E. J. (1967) A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 1, ed. Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T., pp. 67–156. Academic Press. [HIS]Google Scholar
Case, D. A. (2000) To augment yet not contradict. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:93–94. [rRCG]10.1017/S0140525X00252400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwill, R. C. & Rescorla, R. A. (1985) Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 11:120–32. [HIS]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. (1987) On some research-community contributions to the myth of biofeedback. International Journal of Psychophysiology 4:293–97. [JJF]10.1016/0167-8760(87)90041-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedy, J. J. (1992) Reflections on human Pavlovian decelerative heart-rate conditioning with negative tilt as US: Alternative approaches. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 27:347–55. [JJF]10.1007/BF02691169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedy, J. J., Poulos, C. X. & Schiffmann, K. (1975) Logical problems with Prokasy's assessment of contingency relations in classical skin conductance conditioning. Behavior Research and Instrumentation 7:521–23. [JJF]10.3758/BF03201622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedy, J. J. & Riley, D. (1987) Human Pavlovian autonomic conditioning and the cognitive paradigm. In: Cognitive processes and Pavlovian conditioning in humans, ed. Davey, G.. Wiley. [JJF]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. & Shulhan, D. (1987) Specific versus placebo effects in biofeedback training: A critical lay perspective. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 12:211–15. [JJF]10.1007/BF00999200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gormezano, I. (1966) Classical conditioning. In: Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology, ed. Sidowski, J. B., pp. 385–420. McGraw-Hill. [HIS]Google Scholar
Grace, R. C., Schwendiman, J. I. & Nevin, J. A. (1998) Effects of delayed reinforcement on preference and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 69:247–61. [rRCG]10.1901/jeab.1998.69-247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, C. L. (1949) Principles of behavior. Appleton-Century. [JJF]Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. & Brimer, C. J. (1963) The effects of intensity of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli on a conditioned emotional response. Canadian Journal of Psychology 17:194–98. [HIS]10.1037/h0101671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maze, J. R. (1983) The meaning of behavior. Allen & Unwin. [JJF]Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1969) Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science 163:434–45. [JJF]10.1126/science.163.3866.434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R. R. & Matzel, L. D. (1988) The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 22, ed. Bower, G. H., pp. 51–92. Academic Press. [HIS]10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60038-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevin, J. A. (1988) Behavioral momentum and the partial reinforcement effect. Psychological Bulletin 103:44–56. [HIS]10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevin, J. A. & Grace, R. C. (2000) Behavioral momentum and the Law of Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(1):73–130. [JJF, rRCG, HIS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevin, J. A., Grace, R. C., Holland, S. & McLean, A. P. (2001) Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: Response rate, resistance to change, and preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 76:43–74. [rRCG]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prokasy, W. F. (1965) Classical eyelid conditioning: Experimenter operations, task demands, and response shaping. In: Classical conditioning, ed. Prokasy, W. F.. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [JJF]Google ScholarPubMed
Prokasy, W. F. (1975) Random controls: A rejoinder. Behavior Research and Instrumentation 7:524–26. [JJF]10.3758/BF03201623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review 74:71–80. [JJF]10.1037/h0024109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, R. A. (1969) Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin 72:77–94. [JJF]10.1037/h0027760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1988) Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist 43:151–60. [JJF]10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. & Wagner, A. R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, ed. Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F., pp. 64–99. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [HIS]Google Scholar
Sheffield, V. F. (1949) Extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39:511–26. [HIS]10.1037/h0057242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. C. (1968) CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 66:679–87. [HIS]10.1037/h0026550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1932) Purposive behavior in animals and men. Century. [HIS]Google Scholar
Tota-Faucette, M. E. (1991) Alternative reinforcement and resistance to change. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro. [rRCG]Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R., Siegel, S., Thomas, E. & Ellison, G. D. (1964) Reinforcement history and the extinction of a conditioned salivary response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 58:354–58. [HIS]10.1037/h0048721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed