Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T08:16:18.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Did ancestral humans dream for their lives?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2001

Antti Revonsuo
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku, Turku FIN-20014, Finlandrevonsuo@utu.fi www.utu.fi/research/ccn/consciousness.html

Abstract

The most challenging objections to the Threat Simulation Theory (TST) of the function of dreaming include such issues as whether the competing Random Activation Theory can explain dreaming, whether TST can accommodate the apparently dysfunctional nature of post-traumatic nightmares, whether dreams are too bizarre and disorganized to constitute proper simulations, and whether dream recall is too biased to reveal the true nature of dreams. I show how these and many other objections can be accommodated by TST, and how several lines of new supporting evidence are provided by the commentators. Accordingly TST offers a promising new approach to the function of dreaming, covering a wide range of evidence and theoretically integrating psychological and biological levels of explanation.

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)