Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-vpvvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-15T05:37:50.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypo- or hyper-mentalizing: It all depends upon what one means by “mentalizing”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2008

Robyn Langdon
Affiliation:
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia. rlangdon@maccs.mq.edu.auhttp://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/members/profile.htm?memberID=60jbrock@maccs.mq.edu.auhttp://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/members/profile.htm?memberID=203
Jon Brock
Affiliation:
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia. rlangdon@maccs.mq.edu.auhttp://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/members/profile.htm?memberID=60jbrock@maccs.mq.edu.auhttp://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/members/profile.htm?memberID=203

Abstract

By conceiving of autism and psychosis as diametrically opposite phenotypes of underactive and overactive mentalizing, respectively, Crespi & Badcock (C&B) commit themselves to a continuum view of intercorrelated mentalizing functions. This view fails to acknowledge dissociations between mentalizing functions and that psychotic people show a mixture of both hypo- and hyper-mentalizing.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable