Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T07:53:09.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is it impolite to discuss cognitive differences between liberals and conservatives?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Gordon Hodson
Gordon Hodson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada. ghodson@brocku.ca http://brocku.ca/psychology/people/hodson.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hibbing and colleagues argue convincingly that liberals and conservatives differ in reactivity to (negative) stimuli. Yet their analysis sidesteps evidence that cognitive ability differs as a function of ideology. Cognitive abilities, like cognitive preferences (e.g., structure needs), shape whether stimuli are psychologically threatening (prompting avoidance) or offer opportunity (prompting approach). Incorporation of these findings is critical despite any socially “delicate” implications.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 313 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altemeyer, B. (1996) The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Block, J. & Block, J. H. (2006) Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality 40:734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelli, L. & Carraro, L. (2011) Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:1013–16.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Batty, G. D. & Gale, C. R. (2008) Bright children become enlightened adults. Psychological Science 19:1–6.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2007) Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences 43:1025–35.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2006) Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32:684–96.Google Scholar
Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., Goodman, J. A. & Blanchar, J. C. (2012) Low-effort thought promotes political conservatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38:808–20.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Griffin, B. N., Belsky, J. & Roisman, G. I. (2012) Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science 23:1425–31.Google Scholar
Gervais, W. M. & Norenzayan, A. (2012) Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 336:493–96.Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J. & Suhay, E. (2011) Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans' support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science 55:546–60.Google Scholar
Hodson, G. & Busseri, M. A. (2012) Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science 23:187–95.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R. (2009) To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry 20:120–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–75.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2010) Why liberals and atheists are more intelligent. Social Psychology Quarterly 73:33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiller, S. W. (2010) Abstract reasoning as a predictor of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality 57:914–27.Google Scholar
Kemmelmeier, M. (2008) Is there a relationship between political orientation and cognitive ability? A test of three hypotheses in two studies. Personality and Individual Differences 45(8):767–72.Google Scholar
Luguri, J. B., Napier, J. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (2012) Reconstructing intolerance: Abstract thinking reduces conservatives' prejudice against nonnormative groups. Psychological Science 23:756–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCourt, K., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A. & Keyes, M. (1999) Authoritarianism revisited: Genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences 27:985–1014.Google Scholar
Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M. & Thompson, A. W. (2009) Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:901–907.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J. (1985) Cognitive functioning and sociopolitical ideology revisited. Political Psychology 6:637–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankov, L. (2009) Conservatism and cognitive ability. Intelligence 37:294–304.Google Scholar
Sturgis, P., Read, S. & Allum, N. (2010) Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies. Intelligence 38:45–54.Google Scholar
Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E. & De Pauw, S. (2010) The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality 78(6):1765–99. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00669.x.Google Scholar