Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-9jk85 Total loading time: 0.584 Render date: 2022-12-08T03:04:44.351Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Language as shaped by the brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Morten H. Christiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, and Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501christiansen@cornell.eduhttp://www.psych.cornell.edu/people/Faculty/mhc27.html
Nick Chater
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdomn.chater@ucl.ac.ukhttp://www.psychol.ucl.ac.uk/people/profiles/chater_nick.htm

Abstract

It is widely assumed that human learning and the structure of human languages are intimately related. This relationship is frequently suggested to derive from a language-specific biological endowment, which encodes universal, but communicatively arbitrary, principles of language structure (a Universal Grammar or UG). How might such a UG have evolved? We argue that UG could not have arisen either by biological adaptation or non-adaptationist genetic processes, resulting in a logical problem of language evolution. Specifically, as the processes of language change are much more rapid than processes of genetic change, language constitutes a “moving target” both over time and across different human populations, and, hence, cannot provide a stable environment to which language genes could have adapted. We conclude that a biologically determined UG is not evolutionarily viable. Instead, the original motivation for UG – the mesh between learners and languages – arises because language has been shaped to fit the human brain, rather than vice versa. Following Darwin, we view language itself as a complex and interdependent “organism,” which evolves under selectional pressures from human learning and processing mechanisms. That is, languages themselves are shaped by severe selectional pressure from each generation of language users and learners. This suggests that apparently arbitrary aspects of linguistic structure may result from general learning and processing biases deriving from the structure of thought processes, perceptuo-motor factors, cognitive limitations, and pragmatics.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abzhanov, A., Kuo, W. P., Hartmann, C., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R. & Tabin, C. J. (2006) The calmodulin pathway and evolution of elongated beak morphology in Darwin's finches. Nature 442:563–67.Google Scholar
Abzhanov, A., Protas, M., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R. & Tabin, C. J. (2004) Bmp4 and morphological variation of beaks in Darwin's finches. Science 305:1462–65.Google Scholar
Alter, S. (1998) Darwinism and the linguistic image: Language, race, and natural theology in the nineteenth century. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. (1973) Abductive and deductive change. Language 40:765–93.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. A. (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(2):105–24.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J., eds. (1981) The logical problem of language acquisition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baker, M. C. (2001) The atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baker, M. C. (2003) Language differences and language design. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:349–53.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1896) A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist 30:441–51.Google Scholar
Batali, J. (1998) Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In: Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases, ed. Hurford, J. R., Studdert Kennedy, M. & Knight, C., pp. 405–26. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1979) A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In: Developmental pragmatics, ed. Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B., pp. 167209. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987) Competition, variation, and language learning. In: Mechanisms of language acquisition, ed. MacWhinney, B., pp. 157–93. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beer, G. (1996) Darwin and the growth of language theory. In: Open fields: Science in cultural encounter, by Beer, G., pp. 95114. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beja-Pereira, A., Luikart, G., England, P. R., Bradley, D. G., Jann, O. C., Bertorelle, G., Chamberlain, A. T., Nunes, T. P., Metodiev, S., Ferrand, N. & Erhardt, G. (2003) Gene-culture coevolution between cattle milk protein genes and human lactase genes. Nature Genetics 35:311–13.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C. & Weinberg, A. S. (1984) The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: Language use and acquisition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Cognition and language development, ed. Hayes, R., pp. 277360. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. & Langendoen, D. T. (1971) A dynamic model of the evolution of language. Linguistic Inquiry 2:433–63.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1984) The language bio-program hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:173212.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1995) Language and human behavior. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2003) Symbol and structure: A comprehensive framework for language evolution. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 7793. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1984) Spreading the word. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. J. (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2001) Précis of How children learn the meanings of words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(6):1095–103.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. (2006) Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1984) Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Foris.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2005) The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1982) The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Briscoe, E. J. (2003) Grammatical assimilation. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 295316. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E. & Sudhalter, V. (1993) Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language 32:7695.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2002) Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In: The evolution of language out of pre-language, ed. Givón, T. & Malle, B., pp. 107–32. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (in press) Language universals and usage-based theory. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. & Pagliuca, W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calvin, W. H. (1994) The emergence of intelligence. Scientific American 271:100107.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1965) Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In: Social change in developing areas: A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory, ed. Barringer, H. R., Blanksten, G. I. & Mack, R. W., pp. 1949. Schenkman.Google Scholar
Cannon, G. (1991) Jones's “Spring from some common source”: 1786–1986. In: Sprung from some common source: Investigations into the pre-history of languages, ed. Lamb, S. M. & Mitchell, E. D.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. Nature Genetics 33:266–75.Google Scholar
Chater, N. (2005) Mendelian and Darwinian views of memes and cultural change. In: Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science, vol. 2, ed. Hurley, S. & Chater, N., pp. 355–62. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chater, N. & Vitányi, P. (2007) “Ideal learning” of natural language: Positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 51:135–63.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972) Language and mind, Extended edition. Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and representations. Columbia University Press/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of language. Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and the problems of knowledge. The Managua Lectures. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993) Language and thought. Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2005b) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36:122.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. (1994) Infinite languages, finite minds: Connectionism, learning and linguistic structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. (2000) Using artificial language learning to study language evolution: Exploring the emergence of word universals. In: The evolution of language: 3rd international conference, ed. Dessalles, J. L. & Ghadakpour, L., pp. 4548. Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S., eds. (in press) Language universals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., Conway, C. M. & Onnis, L. (2007) Overlapping neural responses to structural incongruencies in language and statistical learning point to similar underlying mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. MacNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G., pp. 173–78. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & Dale, R. (2004) The role of learning and development in the evolution of language. A connectionist perspective. In: Evolution of communication systems: A comparative approach. The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, ed. Kimbrough Oller, D. & Griebel, U., pp. 90109. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & Devlin, J. T. (1997) Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Shafto, M. G. & Langley, P., pp. 113–18. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., Kelly, L., Shillcock, R. & Greenfield, K. (submitted) Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., Reali, F. & Chater, N. (2006) The Baldwin effect works for functional, but not arbitrary, features of language. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Evolution of Language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. & Smith, K., pp. 2734. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1975) Bridging. In: Theoretical issues in natural language processing, ed. Schank, R. C. & Nash-Webber, B. L., pp. 169–74. Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Conway, C. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2001) Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:539–46.Google Scholar
Conway, C. M., Karpicke, J. & Pisoni, D. B. (2007) Contribution of implicit sequence learning to spoken language processing: Some preliminary findings with hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 12:317–34.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (1992) On the evolution of language and generativity. Cognition 44:197226.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2003) From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 201–18. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, H. (2006) Iterated learning with human subjects: An empirical framework for the emergence and cultural transmission of language. Unpublished Masters thesis, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Crain, S. (1991) Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:597650.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Goro, T. & Thornton, R. (2006) Language acquisition is language change. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:3149.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Pietroski, P. (2001) Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 24:139–85.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Pietroski, P. (2006) Is Generative Grammar deceptively simple or simply deceptive? Lingua 116:6468.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Longman.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruise, D. A. (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. (1999) Syntactic nuts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. & Jackendoff, R. (2005) Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition 96:233–62.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. & Segui, J. (1986) The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25:385400.Google Scholar
Dabrowska, E. (1997) The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics 35:735–66.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1874) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, 2nd edition.John Murray.Google Scholar
Davidson, I. (2003) The archaeological evidence of language origins: States of art. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 140–57. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. (1987) “Organic” and “Organism” in Franz Bopp. In: Biological metaphor and cladistic classification, ed. Bopp, Franz. In: 81107. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1986) The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. Penguin.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton/Penguin.Google Scholar
Dediu, D. & Ladd, D. R. (2007) Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes. ASPM and microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:10944–49.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995) Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Penguin/Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
de Vries, M., Monaghan, P., Knecht, S., & Zwitserlood, P. (in press) Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1992) The third chimpanzee: The evolution and future of the human animal. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1998) Mimesis and the executive suite: Missing links in language evolution. In: Approaches to the evolution of language, ed. Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight, C., pp. 4467. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1992) The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68:81138.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003) The origin and subsequent evolution of language. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 219–34. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellefson, M. R. & Christiansen, M. H. (2000) Subjacency constraints without universal grammar: Evidence from artificial language learning and connectionist modeling. In: The Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Gleitman, L. R. & Joshi, A. K., pp. 645–50. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1999) Origins of language: A conspiracy theory. In: The emergence of language, ed. MacWhinney, B.. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996) Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1970) Celestial rotation: Its importance in the development of migratory orientation. Science 170:11981201.Google Scholar
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A. P. & Pääbo, S. (2002) Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418:869–72.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. (2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46:621–46.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. (2007) Cultural constraints on grammar in Pirahã: A Reply to Nevins, Pesetsky, and Rodrigues (2007). (Online publication). Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000427://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000427.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H. & Monaghan, P. (2006) Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:12203–208.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. E. (2006) Tangled webs: Tracing the connections between genes and cognition. Cognition 101:270–97.Google Scholar
Fitneva, S. A. & Spivey, M. J. (2004) Context and language processing: The effect of authorship. In: Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, ed. Trueswell, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K., pp. 317–28. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1982) The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975) The language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frean, M. R. & Abraham, E. R. (2004) Adaptation and enslavement in endosymbiont-host associations. Physical Review E 69:051913.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schibotz, R. I. & Anwander, A. (2006) The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:2458–63.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K. & Pfeifer, E. (2002) Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:529–34.Google Scholar
Frigo, L. & McDonald, J. L. (1998) Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language 39:218–45.Google Scholar
Gerhart, J. & Kirschner, M. (1997) Cells, embryos and evolution: Toward a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979) On understanding grammar. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1998) On the co-evolution of language, mind and brain. Evolution of Communication 2:45116.Google Scholar
Givón, T. & Malle, B. F., eds. (2002) The evolution of language out of pre-language. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gold, E. (1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 16:447–74.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsby, R. A., Kindt, T. K., Osborne, B. A. & Kuby, J. (2003) Immunology, 5th edition.W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L., Woodward, A., Akhtar, N., Tomasello, M. & Hollich, G., eds. (2000) Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez, R. L. (2002) Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science 13:431–36.Google Scholar
Gómez, R. L. & Gerken, L. A. (2000) Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:178–86.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1993) Eight little piggies: Reflections in natural history. Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 205:581–98.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. & Vrba, E. S. (1982) Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:415.Google Scholar
Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. (2003) Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–39.Google Scholar
Green, T. R. G. (1979) Necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18:481–96.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1991) Language, tools, and the brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14(4):531–95.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967) Logic and conversation. William James Lectures. Manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gruber, O. (2002) The co-evolution of language and working memory capacity in the human brain. In: Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language, ed. Stamenov, M. I. & Gallese, V., pp. 7786. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haber, R. N. (1983) The impending demise of the icon: The role of iconic processes in information processing theories of perception (with commentaries). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:155.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:152.Google Scholar
Hampe, B., ed. (2006) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hare, M. & Elman, J. L. (1995) Learning and morphological change. Cognition 56:6198.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. (2001) Wild minds: What animals really think. Owl Books.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598):1569–79.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. & Fitch, W. T. (2003) What are the uniquely human components of the language faculty? in: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 158–81. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawks, J. D., Hunley, K., Lee, S-H. & Wolpoff, M. (2000) Population bottlenecks and Pleistocene human evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:222.Google Scholar
Hecht Orzak, S. & Sober, E., eds. (2001) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1991) Grammaticalization. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. (2002) On the evolution of grammatical forms. In: Transitions to language, ed. Wray, A., pp. 376–97. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E. & Nowlan, S. J. (1987) How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems 1:495502.Google Scholar
Hoen, M., Golembiowski, M., Guyot, E., Deprez, V., Caplan, D. & Dominey, P. F. (2003) Training with cognitive sequences improves syntactic comprehension in agrammatic aphasics. NeuroReport 14: 495–99.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. (2001) Move! A minimalist approach to construal. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Boeckx, C. (in press) Approaching universals from below: I-Universals in light of a minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D., eds. (1981) Explanations in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition. Longman.Google Scholar
Hsu, H.-J., Christiansen, M. H., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X. & Gómez, R. L. (2006) Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in adolescents with and without language impairment. Poster presented at the 2006 Symposium on Research in Child Language DisordersMadison, WI.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. (2000) Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2005) Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1:151–95.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (1990) Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In: Logical issues in language acquisition, ed. Roca, I. M., pp. 85136. Foris.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (1991) The evolution of the critical period for language learning. Cognition 40:159201.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (2003) The language mosaic and its evolution. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 3857. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. & Kirby, S. (1999) Co-evolution of language size and the critical period in: Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, ed. Birdsong, D., pp. 3963. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (1989) The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 139:6983.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jain, S., Osherson, D., Royer, J. & Sharma, A. (1999) Systems that learn, 2nd edition.MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L. (2000) Biolinguistics: Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (2006) Working backwards from modern language to proto-grammar. In: The evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K., pp. 160–67. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Juliano, C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994) A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23:459–71.Google Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M. & Haywood, S. (2003) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49:133–59.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P. & Glenberg, A. M. (2004) This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133:450–67.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. (1995) The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, R. (1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (1998) Fitness and the selective adaptation of language. In: Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases, ed. Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight, C., pp. 359–83. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (1999) Function, selection and innateness: The emergence of language universals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S., Dowman, M. & Griffiths, T. (2007) Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:5241–45.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. & Hurford, J. (1997) Learning, culture and evolution in the origin of linguistic constraints. In: ECAL97, ed. Husbands, P. & Harvey, I., pp. 493502. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. & Hurford, J. (2002) The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In: Simulating the evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A. & Parisi, D., pp. 121–48. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (1987) The special mechanisms debate in speech research: Categorization tests on animals and infants. In: Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition, ed. Harnad, S., pp. 355–86. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kvasnicka, V. & Pospichal, J. (1999) An emergence of coordinated communication in populations of agents. Artificial Life 5:318–42.Google Scholar
Lai, C. S. L., Fisher, S. E., Hurst, J. A., Vargha-Khadem, F. & Monaco, A. P. (2001) A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 413:519–23.Google Scholar
Lai, C. S. L., Gerrelli, D., Monaco, A. P., Fisher, S. E. & Copp, A. J. (2003) FOXP2 expression during brain development coincides with adult sites of pathology in a severe speech and language disorder. Brain 126:2455–62.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lanyon, S. J. (2006) A saltationist approach for the evolution of human cognition and language. In: The evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K., pp. 176–83. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, ed. Jeffress, L. A., pp. 112–46. Wiley.Google Scholar
Laubichler, M. D. & Maienschein, J., eds. (2007) From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1987a). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23:379434.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1987b) Minimization and conversational inference. In: The pragmatic perspective: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pragmatics at Viareggio, ed. Papi, M. & Verschueren, J., pp. 61129. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1998) The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In: An invitation to cognitive science, vol. 4: Methods, models, and conceptual issues, ed. Scarborough, D. & Sternberg, S.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, M. & Vitányi, P. (1997) An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity theory and its applications, 2nd edition.Springer.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1984) The biology and evolution of language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1991) Speech and brain evolution. Behavioral and Brain Science 14:566–68.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (2003) Motor control, speech, and the evolution of human language. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 255–71. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (2000) The spandrels of the linguistic genotype. In: The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form, ed. Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Hurford, J. R., pp. 231–47. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Goldinger, S. D. (1994) Spoken word recognition. In: Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. Gernsbacher, M. A., pp. 265318. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone, D. & Fyfe, C. (2000) Modelling language-physiology coevolution. In: The emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form, ed. Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Hurford, J. R., pp. 199215. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. & Bogin, B. (2006) Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:259–80.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Christiansen, M. H. (2002) Case, word order, and language learnability: Insights from connectionist modeling. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Gray, W. D. & Schunn, C. D., pp. 596601. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacDermot, K. D., Bonora, E., Sykes, N., Coupe, A. M., Lai, C. S. L., Vernes, S. C., Vargha-Khadem, F., McKenzie, F., Smith, R. L., Monaco, A. P. & Fisher, S. E. (2005) Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits. American Journal of Human Genetics 76:1074–80.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. & Christiansen, M. H. (2002) Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109:3554.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101:676703.Google Scholar
Mackay, D. J. C. (2003) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. (1998) The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:499511.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., ed. (1999) The emergence of language. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C. & Friederici, A. D. (2001) Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience 4:540–45.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F. (2002) The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution. In: The evolution of language out of pre-language, ed. Givón, T. & Malle, B., pp. 265–84. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F. (2004) The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maynard-Smith, J. (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9:3156.Google Scholar
McClintock, B. (1950) The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36:344–55.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. M. S. (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Chater, N. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition 96:143–82.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P. & Christiansen, M. H. (2008) Integration of multiple probabilistic cues in syntax acquisition. In: Trends in corpus research: Finding structure in data (TILAR Series), ed. Behrens, H., pp. 139–63. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (1996) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P. & Newport, E. L. (1987) Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology 19:498550.Google Scholar
Munroe, S. & Cangelosi, A. (2002) Learning and the evolution of language: the role of cultural variation and learning cost in the Baldwin Effect. Artificial Life 8:311–39.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (2002) The big book of concepts. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nerlich, B. (1989) The evolution of the concept of “linguistic evolution” in the 19th and 20th century. Lingua 77:101–12.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997) Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology 38:9399.Google Scholar
Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D. & Rodrigues, C. (2007) Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. (Online publication). Available at: http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000411://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000411.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1991) Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication 11:328.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (2003) What can the field of linguistics tell us about the origin of language? in: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 5876. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. (2004) Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48:127–62.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Komarova, N. L. & Niyogi, P. (2001) Evolution of universal grammar. Science 291:114–18.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2005) Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Christiansen, M. H., Chater, N. & Gómez, R. (2003) Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: Evidence from artificial grammar learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Alterman, R. & Kirsh, D., pp. 886–91. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Chater, N. & Richmond, K. (2005) Phonology impacts segmentation in speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language 53:225–37.Google Scholar
Osherson, D., Stob, M. & Weinstein, S. (1986) Systems that learn. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A. & Mehler, J. (1993) Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 32:258–78.Google Scholar
Packard, M. & Knowlton, B. (2002) Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25:563–93.Google Scholar
Patel, A. D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M. & Holcomb, P. J. (1998) Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10:717–33.Google Scholar
Pearlmutter, N. J. & MacDonald, M. C. (1995) Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 34:521–42.Google Scholar
Peña, M., Bonnatti, L., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (2002) Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science 298:604607.Google Scholar
Pennisi, E. (2004) The first language? Science 303:1319–20.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K. (1987) Biological analogy in the study of languages before the advent of comparative grammar. In: Biological metaphor and cladistic classification, ed. Hoenigswald, H. M. & Wiener, L. F., pp. 338. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Petersson, K. M., Forkstam, C. & Ingvar, M. (2004) Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cognitive Science 28:383407.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989) Evolution, selection and cognition: From “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition 31(1):144.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994) Ever since language and learning: Afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. Cognition 50:315–46.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984) Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2003) Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 1637. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:707–27; discussion 727–84. Available at: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.pinker.html.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (2005) The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition 95(2):201–36.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (in press) The components of language: What's specific to language, and what's specific to humans? in: Language universals, ed. Christiansen, M. H., Collins, C. & Edelman, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plante, E., Gómez, R. L. & Gerken, L. A. (2002) Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 35:453–62.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, J. R. & Kubovy, M. (1986) Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. In: Handbook of perception and human performance, vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance, ed. Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P., pp. 36–1–36–46. Wiley.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Raddick, G. (2000) Review of S. Alter's Darwinism and the Linguistic Image. British Journal for the History of Science 33:122–24.Google Scholar
Raddick, G. (2002) Darwin on language and selection. Selection 3:716.Google Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2007) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57:123.Google Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (in press) Sequential learning and the interaction between biological and linguistic adaptation in language evolution. Interaction Studies.Google Scholar
Reeder, P. A. (2004). Language learnability and the evolution of word order universals: Insights from artificial grammar learning. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis, Department of Psychology, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. (2005) Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ritt, N. (2004) Selfish sounds and linguistic evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossel, S., Corlija, J. & Schuster, S. (2002) Predicting three-dimensional target motion: How archer fish determine where to catch their dislodged prey. Journal of Experimental Biology 205:3321–26.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. (2001) The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44:493515.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. (2002) Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 47:172–96.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. (2003) Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12:110–14.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996a) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926–28.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. (1996b) Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language 35:606–21.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A. & Pollard, C. J. (1987) Head-driven phrase structure grammar: An informal synopsis. CSLI Report 87–79. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Aronoff, M. (2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(7):2661–65.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (1863) Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schlosser, G. & Wagner, G. P., eds. (2004) Modularity in development and evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schoenemann, P. T. (1999) Syntax as an emergent characteristic of the evolution of semantic complexity. Minds and Machines 9:309–46.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985) The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19:130.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1997) Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 275:15991604.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. & MacDonald, M. (2001) Constraint-satisfaction in language acquisition. In: Connectionist psycholinguistics, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N., pp. 281318. Ablex.Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S. & Özyürek, A. (2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305(5691):1779–82.Google Scholar
Sereno, M. I. (1991) Four analogies between biological and cultural/linguistic evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 151:467507.Google Scholar
Simoncelli, E. P. & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) Natural image statistics as neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24:11931215.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In: Studies of child language development, ed. Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I., pp. 175208. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G. (1982) Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12:229–65.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2002) Natural selection and cultural selection in the evolution of communication. Adaptive Behavior 10:2544.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2004) The evolution of vocabulary. Journal of Theoretical Biology 228:127–42.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Brighton, H. & Kirby, S. (2003a) Complex systems in language evolution: The cultural emergence of compositional structure. Advances in Complex Systems 6:537–58.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stallings, L., MacDonald, M. & O'Seaghdha, P. (1998) Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language 39:392417.Google Scholar
Steedman, M. (2000) The syntactic process. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevick, R. D. (1963) The biological model and historical linguistics. Language 39:159–69.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Goldstein, L. (2003) Launching language: The gestural origin of discrete infinity. In: Language evolution, ed. Christiansen, M. H. & Kirby, S., pp. 235–54. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, D. T., Griffiths, A. J. F., Miller, J. H. & Lewontin, R. C. (1989) An introduction to genetic analysis, 4th edition.W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Syvanen, M. (1985) Cross-species gene transfer: Implications for a new theory of evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 112:333–43.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M. & Sedivy, J. E. (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268:1632–34.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K. & Trueswell, J. C. (1995) Sentence comprehension. In: Handbook of cognition and perception, ed. Miller, J. & Eimas, P., pp. 217–62. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000a) Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74:209–53.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000b) The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:156–63.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. ed. (2000c) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2004) What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? A commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language 28(3):642–44.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008) Origins of human communication. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675–91.Google Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Mainela-Arnold, M. E. & Zhang, X. (2007) Procedural learning in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Language Learning and Development 3:269–93.Google Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Shriberg, L., Murray, J., Patil, S. & Williams, C. (2004) Speech and language characteristics associated with a 7/13 translocation involving FOXP2. American Journal of Medical Genetics 130B:97.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92:231–70.Google Scholar
Van Everbroeck, E., (1999) Language type frequency and learnability: A connectionist appraisal. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Hahn, M. & Stoness, S. C., pp. 755–60. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Voight, B. F., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X. & Pritchard, J. K. (2006) A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PloS Biology 4:e72.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, W. (1836/1999) On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the metal development of the human species. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1836).Google Scholar
Vouloumanos, A. & Werker, J. F. (2007) Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science 10:159–64.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1942) Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150:563–65.Google Scholar
Weber, B. H. & Depew, D. J., eds. (2003) Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B., eds. (2001) Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilkins, W. K. & Wakefield, J. (1995) Brain evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18:161–82.Google Scholar
Yamashita, H. & Chang, F. (2001) “Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language. Cognition 81:B45B55.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, H. (2001) The difficulty of the Baldwinian account of linguistic innateness. In: ECAL-01, ed. Kelemen, J. & Sosík, P., pp. 391400. Springer.Google Scholar
Yang, C. D. (2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeevat, H. (2006) Grammaticalisation and evolution. In: The evolution of language, ed. Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K., pp. 372–78. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Zuidema, W. (2003) How the poverty of the stimulus solves the poverty of the stimulus. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, ed. Becker, S., Thrun, S. & Obermayer, K., pp. 5158. MIT Press.Google Scholar
434
Cited by