Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5cfd469876-d8lm2 Total loading time: 0.732 Render date: 2021-06-23T22:25:24.873Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

R. Alexander Bentley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UU, United Kingdom. r.a.bentley@bristol.ac.uk http://www.alex-bentley.com
Michael J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 obrienm@missouri.edu http://cladistics.coas.missouri.edu
William A. Brock
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211; and Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 wbrock@scc.wisc.edu http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wbrock/

Abstract

The behavioral sciences have flourished by studying how traditional and/or rational behavior has been governed throughout most of human history by relatively well-informed individual and social learning. In the online age, however, social phenomena can occur with unprecedented scale and unpredictability, and individuals have access to social connections never before possible. Similarly, behavioral scientists now have access to “big data” sets – those from Twitter and Facebook, for example – that did not exist a few years ago. Studies of human dynamics based on these data sets are novel and exciting but, if not placed in context, can foster the misconception that mass-scale online behavior is all we need to understand, for example, how humans make decisions. To overcome that misconception, we draw on the field of discrete-choice theory to create a multiscale comparative “map” that, like a principal-components representation, captures the essence of decision making along two axes: (1) an east–west dimension that represents the degree to which an agent makes a decision independently versus one that is socially influenced, and (2) a north–south dimension that represents the degree to which there is transparency in the payoffs and risks associated with the decisions agents make. We divide the map into quadrants, each of which features a signature behavioral pattern. When taken together, the map and its signatures provide an easily understood empirical framework for evaluating how modern collective behavior may be changing in the digital age, including whether behavior is becoming more individualistic, as people seek out exactly what they want, or more social, as people become more inextricably linked, even “herdlike,” in their decision making. We believe the map will lead to many new testable hypotheses concerning human behavior as well as to similar applications throughout the social sciences.

Type
Target Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Adamic, L. A. & Huberman, B. A. (2000) Power-law distribution of the World Wide Web. Science 287:2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, D. P. (2012) How to weather a hurricane. New York Times, August 2, 2012, p. A27.Google Scholar
Allen, D. & Wilson, T. D. (2003) Information overload: Context and causes. New Review of Information Behaviour Research 4:3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P. M. & McGlade, J. M. (1986) Dynamics of discovery and exploitation: The case of the Scotian Shelf groundfish fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 43:1187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvergne, A., Gurmu, E., Gibson, M. A. & Mace, R. (2011) Social transmission and the spread of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alves, R. R. N. & Rosa, I. M. L. (2007) Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: Where do they meet? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3:14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M. & Stanley, H. E. (2000) Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97:11149–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaro de Matos, J. & Perez, J. (1991) Fluctuations in the Curie–Weiss version of the random field Ising model. Journal of Statistical Physics 6:587608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. (2012) Social networks and cooperation in hunter–gatherers. Nature 481:497501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aral, S. & Walker, D. (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337:337–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arawatari, R. (2009) Informatization, voter turnout and income inequality. Journal of Economic Inequality 7:2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkisson, C., O'Brien, M. J. & Mesoudi, A. (2012) Adult learners in a novel environment use prestige-biased social learning. Evolutionary Psychology 10:519–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabási, A.-L. & Albert, R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–12. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10521342.Google ScholarPubMed
Baron, J. (2007) Thinking and deciding, 3rd and 4th editions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Basalla, G. (1989) The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, B. R., Romina, S., Ahmed, R. & Hopson, D. (2006) The effect of source credibility on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 31:4552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batty, M. (2006) Rank clocks. Nature 444:592–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. & Tierney, J. (2011) Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. Penguin.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1962) Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70:113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1991) A treatise on the family, enlarged edition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beinhocker, E. D. (2006) The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. Random House.Google Scholar
Belefant-Miller, H. & King, D. W. (2001) How, what, and why science faculty read. Science and Technology Libraries 19:91112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benotsch, E. G., Kalichman, S. & Weinhardt, L. S. (2004) HIV–AIDS patients' evaluations of health information on the Internet: The digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 72:1004–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A., Earls, M. & O'Brien, M. J. (2011) I'll have what she's having: Mapping social behavior. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, R. A., Garnett, P., O'Brien, M. J. & Brock, W. A. (2012) Word diffusion and climate science. PLoS ONE 7(11):e47966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentley, R. A., Lipo, C. P., Hahn, M. W. & Herzog, H. A. (2007) Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying. Evolution and Human Behavior 28:151–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A. & Maschner, H. D. G. (2000) A growing network of ideas. Fractals 8:227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A. & O'Brien, M. J. (2011) The selectivity of social learning and the tempo of cultural evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 9:125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A. & O'Brien, M. J. (2012) The buzzwords of the crowd. New York Times, December 1, 2012, p. SR4.Google Scholar
Bentley, R. A. & Ormerod, P. (2010) A rapid method for assessing social versus independent interest in health issues: A case study of “bird flu” and “swine flu”. Social Science and Medicine 71(3):482–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. & Le Mens, G. (2009) How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:8146–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C. & West, G. B. (2007a) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:7301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J. & Strumsky, D. (2007b) Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy 36:107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, R. L., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1996) Style, function and cultural evolutionary processes. In: Darwinian archeologies, ed. Maschner, H. D. G., pp. 133–62. Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, J. S., Golladay, G. J., Greenfield, M. L. V. H. & Baker, L. H. (1999) Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer 86:381–90.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordieu, P. (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J. & Labianca, G. (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323:892–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, W. A. & Durlauf, S. N. (1999) A formal model of theory choice in science. Economic Theory 14:113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, W. A. & Durlauf, S. N. (2001b) Interactions-based models. In: Handbook of econometrics, vol. 5, ed. Heckman, J. & Leamer, E., pp. 3297–80. Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burling, R. (1993) Primate calls, human language, and nonverbal communication. Current Anthropology 34:2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W. & Russon, A. E. (1998) Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:667721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, C. A. & Whiten, A. (2002) Evolutionary perspectives on imitation: Is a comparative psychology of social learning possible? Animal Cognition 5:193208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, N. (2008) Is Google making us stupid? The Atlantic, July/August 2008, pp. 56–63.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Centola, D. (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329:1194–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, M., Benevenuto, F., Haddadi, H. & Gummadi, K. P. (2012) The world of connections and information flow in Twitter. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 42:991–98.Google Scholar
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F. & Gummadi, K. P. (2010) Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ed. Hearst, M. A., Cohen, W. & Gosling, S., pp. 10–17. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine 357:370–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. J. (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 51:661703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzin, I. D., Ioannou, C. C., Demirel, G., Gross, T., Torney, C. J., Hartnett, A., Conradt, L., Levin, S. A. & Leonard, N. E. (2011) Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups. Science 334:1578–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R. & Levin, S. A. (2005) Effective leadership and decision making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433:513–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, A. & Fu, D. (2004) Culture matters: Decision making through increased awareness. Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference Paper, No. 1852, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin's dangerous idea. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
de Sola Price, D. J. (1965) Networks of scientific papers. Science 149:510–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, P. S. & Watts, D. J. (2005) A generalized model of social and biological contagion. Journal of Theoretical Biology 232:587604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. (2008) Winners don't punish. Nature 452:348–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution 22:469–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:681735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 6:178–90.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlauf, S. (1999) How can statistical mechanics contribute to social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96:10582–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durlauf, S. (2002) On the empirics of social capital. Economic Journal 112:F459–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson-Hudson, N. (1966) Karimojong politics. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1959) The pattern of consumer purchases. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C 8:2641.Google Scholar
Eriksson, K., Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. (2007) Critical points in current theory of conformist social learning. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 5:6787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, K., Jansson, F. & Sjöstrand, J. (2010) Bentley's conjecture on popularity toplist turnover under random copying. Ramanujan Journal 23:371–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. A. & Foster, J. G. (2011) Metaknowledge. Science 331:721–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, T. & Giometto, A. (2011) Turnover rate of popularity charts in neutral models. arXiv:1105.4044v1. (Online publication)Google Scholar
Farmer, J. D., Patelli, P. & Zovko, I. I. (2005) The predictive power of zero intelligence in financial markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:2254–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, S. A. (2009) The common patterns of nature. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:1563–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fratkin, E. M. (1989) Household variation and gender inequality in Ariaal Rendille pastoral production. American Anthropologist 91:4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantz, J. & Reinsel, D. (2011) Extracting value from chaos. Available at: www.emc.com/digital_universe.Google Scholar
George, H. R., Swami, V., Cornelissen, P. L. & Tovee, M. J. (2008) Preferences for body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio do not vary with observer age. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 6:207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. H. (2004) Population genetics: A concise guide, 2nd edition. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2007) A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(1):161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H. (2009) The bounds of reason: Game theory and the unification of the behavioral sciences. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Giving USA Foundation (2007) Giving USA 2007: Annual Report on Philanthropy for the year 2006. Giving USA Foundation.Google Scholar
Golder, S. A. & Macy, M. W. (2011) Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science 333:1878–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C. & Chatfield, C. (1984) The Dirichlet: A comprehensive model of buying behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 147:621–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. J., Milne, B. T., Walker, R. S., Burger, O. & Brown, J. H. (2007) The complex structure of hunter–gatherer social networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274:2195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimemez, J., Simoes, A. & Yildirim, M. A. (2011) The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Center for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Helbing, D. & Yu, W. (2009) The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:3680–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helbing, D., Farkas, I. & Vicsek, T. (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemp, P. (2009) Death by information overload. Harvard Business Review 87(9):8289.Google ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J. (2004) Demography and cultural evolution: Why adaptive cultural processes produced maladaptive losses in Tasmania. American Antiquity 69:197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2010) The evolution of innovation-enhancing institutions. In: Innovation in cultural systems: Contributions from evolutionary anthropology, ed. O'Brien, M. J. & Shennan, S. J., pp. 99120. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., and Gil-White, F. J. (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:165–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Gintis, H., McElreath, R. & Fehr, E. (2001) In search of Homo economicus: Experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91:7379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Fehr, E., Camerer, C., McElreath, R., Gurven, M., Hill, K., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Tracer, D., Marlow, F., Patton, J., Alvard, M., Gil-White F. & Henrich, N. (2005) “Economic Man” in cross-cultural perspective: Ethnography and experiments from 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:795855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:61135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Bar, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D. & Ziker, J. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312:1767–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. M. (1994) Social learning in animals: Categories and mechanisms. Biological Reviews 69:207–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Božicčević, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., Hewlett, B., Hurtad, A. M., Marlowe, F., Wiessner, P. & Wood, B. (2011) Co-residence patterns in hunter–gatherer show unique human social structure. Science 331:1286–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, N. & Alexander, J. (2006) Handbook of customer satisfaction and loyalty measurement. Gower.Google Scholar
Hill, R. A., Bentley, R. A. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008) Network scaling reveals consistent fractal pattern in hierarchical mammalian societies. Biology Letters 4:748–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G. & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 14:399425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, B. A. & Adamic, L. A. (1999) Growth dynamics of the World-Wide Web. Nature 401:131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (2009) Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science 314:599600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, H. M. & Stern, P. C. (2007) Research and networks for decision support in the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2010) Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:367416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 93:1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandler, A., Laland, K.N. (2009) An investigation of the relationship between innovation and cultural diversity. Theoretical Population Biology 76:5967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, D. A., Maruvka, Y. E., Ouren, J. & Shnerb, N. M. (2012) You name it – How memory and delay govern first name dynamics. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kikumbih, N., Hanson, K., Mills, A., Mponda, H. & Schellenberg, J. A. (2005) The economics of social marketing: The case of mosquito nets in Tanzania. Social Science and Medicine 60:369–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, P. (1993) The advancement of science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kline, M. A. & Boyd, R. (2010) Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277:2559–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koerper, H. C. & Stickel, E. G. (1980) Cultural drift: A primary process of culture change. Journal of Anthropological Research 36:463–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krakauer, D. (2011) Darwinian demons, evolutionary complexity, and information maximization. Chaos 21:037110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krugman, P. (2012) The power (law) of Twitter. New York Times blogpost February 8, 2012. Available at: http://nyti.ms/zVLT72 Google Scholar
Laherrère, J. & Sornette, D. (1998) Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “Fat tails” with characteristic scales. European Physical Journal B 2:525–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. & Brown, G. R. (2011) Sense and nonsense: Evolutionary perspectives on human behaviour, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N. (2004) Social learning strategies. Learning and Behavior 32:414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J. & Myles, S. (2010) How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics 11:137–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenton, A. P., Fasolo, B. & Todd, P. M. (2008) “Shopping” for a mate: Expected vs. experienced preferences in online mate choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (Special Section: Darwinian Perspectives on Electronic Communication) 51:169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, A. P., Fasolo, B. & Todd, P. M. (2009) The relationship between number of potential mates and mating skew in humans. Animal Behaviour 77:5560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, I. (1961) A pastoral democracy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M. & Kaufman, J. (2011) Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:6872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A. & Christakis, N. (2008) Taste, times, and ties: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks 30:330–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. & Lee, L. (2009) Binary choice under social interactions: An empirical study with and without subjective data on expectations. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24:257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, E., Hauert, C. & Nowak, M. A. (2005) Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 433:312–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, E., Michel, J.-B., Jackson, J., Tang, T. & Nowak, M. A. (2007) Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449:713–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F. & Helbing, D. (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:9020–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, B. S. (2001) Why sex matters: A Darwinian look at human behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mace, R. & Colleran, H. (2009) Kin influence on the decision to start using modern contraception: A longitudinal study from rural Gambia. American Journal of Human Biology 21:472–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malmgren, R. D., Ottino, J. M. & Nunes Amaro, L. A. (2010) The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature 465:622–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manski, C. F. (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60:531–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, E. (2000) Reinventing an ancient cure for malaria. Science 290:437–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masucci, A. P., Kalampokis, A., Martínez Equíluz, V. & Hernández-García, E. (2011) Wikipedia information flow analysis reveals the scale-free architecture of the semantic space. PLoS ONE 6(2):e17333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateos, P., Longley, P. A. & O'Sullivan, D. (2011) Ethnicity and population structure in personal naming networks. PLoS ONE 6(9):e22943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T. & Rosenthal, H. (2006) Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. L. (2001) Economic choices. American Economic Review 91:351–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2008) An experimental simulation of the “copy-successful-individuals” cultural learning strategy: Adaptive landscapes, producer–scrounger dynamics, and informational access costs. Evolution and Human Behavior 29:350–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2011) Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. & Lycett, S. J. (2009) Random copying, frequency-dependent copying and culture change. Evolution and Human Behavior 30:4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A. & Laland, K. N. (2006) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:329–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milot, E., Mayer, F. M., Nussey, D. H., Boisvert, M., Pelletier, F. & Réale, D. (2011) Evidence for evolution in response to natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:17040–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, T. T. & Holden, R. K. (2002) The strategy and tactics of pricing. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2009) Ecological influences on human behavioural diversity: A review of recent findings. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:618–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (2010) Understanding of evolution may be improved by thinking about people. Evolutionary Psychology 8:205–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestle, M. & Nesheim, M. (2012) Why calories count: From science to politics. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J. (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics 46:323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, M. J. & Bentley, R. A. (2011) Stimulated variation and cascades: Two processes in the evolution of complex technological systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 18:309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M. A. (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441:502505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onnela, J.-P. & Reed-Tsochas, F. (2010) Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:18375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ormerod, P. (2012) Positive linking: How networks can revolutionise the world. Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Ouattara, K., Lemasson, A. & Zuberbühler, K (2009) Campbell's monkeys use affixation to alter call meaning. PLoS ONE 4(11):e7808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plous, S. (1993) The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Cihangir, S. (2001) Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80:918–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, A., Shennan, S. & Thomas, M. G. (2009) Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324:1298–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rand, D. G. (2012) The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology 299:172–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. (2009) Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325:1272–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reali, F. & Griffiths, T. L. (2010) Words as alleles: Connecting language evolution with Bayesian learners to models of genetic drift. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277:429–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rendell, L., Fogarty, L., Hoppitt, W. J. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Webster, M. M. & Laland, K. N. (2011) Cognitive culture: Theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15:6876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repetto, R. (2006) Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1962) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (2012) Process, responsibility, and Myron's Law. In: In the wake of the crisis: Leading economists reassess economic policy, ed. Blanchard, O. J., Romer, D., Spence, A. M. & Stigltiz, J. E., pp. 111–24. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Saavedra, S., Reed-Tsochas, F. & Uzzi, B. (2009) A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks. Nature 457:463–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S. & Watts, D. J. (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–56. doi:10.1126/science.1121066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, P. C. (1999) Is inequality universal? Current Anthropology 40:3161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, A. & Berger, J. (2012) Decision quicksand: How trivial choices suck us in. Journal of Consumer Research 39:360–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalizi, C. R. & Thomas, A. C. (2010) Homophily and contagion are genetically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research 40:211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, S. J. (2000) Population, culture history and the dynamics of culture change. Current Anthropology 41:811–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkin, M. V. & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2003) Read before you ref! Complex Systems 14:269.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69:99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, B., Liu, J. & Wegner, D. M. (2011) Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333:776–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. (2012) Six reasons why political polarization will only get worse. Huffington Post (October 14). Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/megatrend-six-reasons-ame_b_1965182.html.Google Scholar
Stringer, M. J., Sales-Pardo, M. & Amaral, L. A. N. (2010) Statistical validation of a global model for the distribution of the ultimate number of citations accrued by papers published in a scientific journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61:1377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumecki, D., Chipulu, M. & Ojiako, U. (2011) Email overload: Exploring the moderating role of the perception of email as a “business critical” tool. International Journal of Information Management 31:407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. Abacus.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. (1970) Future shock. Random House.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C. & Ratner, H. H. (1993) Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:495511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsetsos, K., Chater, K. & Usher, M. (2012) Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:9659–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twenge, J., Campbell, K. W. & Gentile, B. (2012) Increases in individualistic words and phrases in American books, 19602008. PLoS ONE 7(7):e40181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (2006) World urbanization prospects: The 2005 revision. United Nations.Google Scholar
Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Pagel, M. (2010) Phylogenies reveal new interpretation of speciation and the Red Queen. Nature 463:349–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M. & Gummadi, K. P. (2009) On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, ed. Crowcroft, J. & Krishnamurthy, B., pp. 3742. Association for Computing Machinery.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeks, R. A. (1996) Tropical forest healers and habitat preference. Economic Botany 50:381400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. J. & Hasker, S. (2006) Marketing in an unpredictable world. Harvard Business Review 84(9):2530.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1995) A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition 13:319–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterhalder, B., Kennett, D. J., Grote, M. N. & Bartruff, J. (2010) Ideal free settlement of California's Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 29:469–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterhalder, B. & Smith, E. A. (2000) Analyzing adaptive strategies: Human behavioral ecology at twenty-five. Evolutionary Anthropology 9:5172.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, F. & Huberman, B. A. (2007) Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:17599–601.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1924) A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 213:2187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Zun, L. S., Blume, D. N., Lester, J., Simpson, G. & Downey, L. (2004) Accuracy of emergency medical information on the web. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 22:9497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48
Cited by

Linked content

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era
Available formats