Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T15:34:12.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meeting Newell's other challenge: Cognitive architectures as the basis for cognitive engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

Wayne D. Gray ,
Michael J. Schoelles  and
Christopher W. Myers
Wayne D. Gray*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Department, CogWorks Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590 http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/ http://www.rpi.edu/~schoem/ http://www.rpi.edu/~myersc/
Michael J. Schoelles*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Department, CogWorks Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590 http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/ http://www.rpi.edu/~schoem/ http://www.rpi.edu/~myersc/
Christopher W. Myers*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Department, CogWorks Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590 http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/ http://www.rpi.edu/~schoem/ http://www.rpi.edu/~myersc/
*
grayw@rpi.edu
schoem@rpi.edu
myersc@rpi.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We use the Newell Test as a basis for evaluating ACT-R as an effective architecture for cognitive engineering. Of the 12 functional criteria discussed by Anderson & Lebiere (A&L), we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of ACT-R on the six that we postulate are the most relevant to cognitive engineering.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 609 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable