Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:10:23.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the homogeneity of human handedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Robert E. Hicks
Robert E. Hicks
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, State University of New York, at Albany, Albany, N. Y. 12222
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 299 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annett, J., and Sheridan, M. R.Effects of S-R and R-R compatibility on bimanual movement time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 25:247–52. 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A. L., Meyers, R., and Polder, G. J.Some aspects of handedness. Psychiatrica Neurologia: Basel. 144:321–37. 1962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. S., Knauft, E. B., and Rosenbaum, G.The accuracy of positioning movements as a function of their direction and extent. American Journal of Psychology. 61:167–182. 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, J. E.Back-slanted writing and sinistral tendencies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 23:277–86. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleishman, E. A.On the relation between abilities, learning, and human performance. American Psychologist. 27:1017–32. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowers, K.Handedness and controlled movement. British J ournal of Psychology. 66:39–52. 1975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellebrandt, F. A., and Houtz, S. J.Ergographic study of hand dominance. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 8:225–36. 1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, R. E.Intrahemispheric response competition between vocal and unimanual performance in normal adult human males. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 89:50–60. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, M. E.Consistency of hand usage. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 21:214–25. 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, D., and Vanderwolf, C. H.The relation between hand preference and the performance of individual finger movements by left and right hands. Brain. 93:769–74. 1970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, R., and Saito, H.Preferred hand and reaction time in different movement patterns. Perceptual and Mot or Skills. 39:1275–81. 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, R., Taniguchi, R., and Oshima, Y.Synchronization error in bilateral simultaneous flexion of elbows. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 40:527–32. 1975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provins, K. A.Motor skills, handedness, and behaviour. Australian Journal of Psychology. 19:137–50. 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, G. F., and Smith, A. C.Laterality and directional preferences in a simple perceptual-motor task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 13:122–24. 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, M. R.Effects of S-R compatibility and task difficulty on unimanual movement time. Journal of Motor Behavior. 5:199–205. 1973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimrat, N.The impact of laterality and cultural background on the development of writing skills. Neuropsychologia. 11:239–42. 1973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steingrueber, H. J.Handedness as a function of test complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 40:263–66. 1975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed