A statistical taxonomy and another “chance” for natural frequencies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2007
The conclusions of Barbey & Sloman (B&S) crucially depend on evidence for different representations of statistical information. Unfortunately, a muddled distinction made among these representations calls into question the authors' conclusions. We clarify some notions of statistical representations which are often confused in the literature. These clarifications, combined with new empirical evidence, do not support a dual-process model of judgment.
- Open Peer Commentary
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007