Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Olson, Mark E. and Arroyo-Santos, Alfonso 2015. How to Study Adaptation (and Why To Do It That Way). The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 90, Issue. 2, p. 167.


    Klasios, John 2014. The evolutionary psychology of human mating: A response to Buller's critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 47, p. 1.


    Rofé, Yacov and Rofé, Yochay 2013. Conversion Disorder: A Review Through the Prism of the Rational-Choice Theory of Neurosis. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 832.


    ×

Adaptationism and inference to the best explanation

  • Brian Haig (a1) and Russil Durrant (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02370092
  • Published online: 01 August 2002
Abstract

Andrews et al. effectively argue that, despite prominent criticism, adaptationism can be a viable research strategy. We agree. In our complementary commentary, we discuss the neglected method of inference to the best explanation and argue that it is a valuable addition to the adaptationist's methodological practice.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×