Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Are mental states assessed relative to what most people “should” or “would” think? Prescriptive and descriptive components of expected attitudes

  • Tamar A. Kreps (a1) and Benoît Monin (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001792
  • Published online: 22 October 2010
Abstract
Abstract

For Knobe, observers evaluate mental states by comparing agents' statements with “defaults,” the attitudes they are expected to hold. In our analysis, Knobe's model relies primarily on what agents should think, and little on expectancies of what they would think. We show the importance and complexity of including descriptive and prescriptive norms if one is to take expectancies seriously.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. E. Asch (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs 70(9):170.

A. H. Eagly , W. Wood & S. Chaiken (1978) Causal inference about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:424–35.

D. Pettit & J. Knobe (2009) The pervasive impact of moral judgment. Mind and Language 24:586604.

D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (1996) Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 28:161210.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×