Bailenson, J. N. & Rips, L. J. (1996) Informal reasoning and burden of proof. Applied Cognitive Psychology
Bloom, P. (2010) How do morals change?
Carruthers, P. (1996) Language, thought and consciousness: An essay in philosophical psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. (1986) An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics
Dunbar, K. (1995) How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In: The nature of insight, ed. Steinberg, R. J. & Davidson, J., pp. 365–95. MIT Press.
Estlund, D. (2007) Democratic authority. A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press.
Goldstein, M., Crowell, A. & Kuhn, D. (2009) What constitutes skilled argumentation and how does it develop?
Haidt, J. & Bjorklund, F. (2007) Social intuitionists reason, in conversation. In: Moral Psychology, vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity, ed. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., pp. 241–54. MIT Press.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006) How we reason. Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K. & Shaenfield, D. (2008) Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development
Landemore, H. (2007) Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. |jHarvard University.
Landemore, H. & Mercier, H. (submitted) “Talking it out”: Deliberation with others versus deliberation within.
Langer, E. J., Blank, A. & Chanowitz, B. (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Larson, M., Britt, M. A. & Larson, A. A. (2004) Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts. Reading Psychology
Levin, I. & Druyan, S. (1993) When sociocognitive transaction among peers fails: The case of misconceptions in science. Child Development
Mascaro, O. & Sperber, D. (2009) The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children's vigilance towards deception. Cognition
Mercier, H. (submitted a) Looking for arguments.
Mercier, H. (in press a) On the universality of argumentative reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Culture.
Mercier, H. (in press b) Reasoning serves argumentation in children. Cognitive Development.
Mercier, H. (in press c) What good is moral reasoning? Mind & Society.
Mercier, H. (submitted b) When experts argue: Explaining the best and the worst of reasoning.
Mercier, H. & Landemore, H. (in press) Reasoning is for arguing: Understanding the successes and failures of deliberation. Political Psychology.
Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2009) Intuitive and reflective inferences. In: In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, ed. Evans, J. St. B. T. & Frankish, K., pp. 149–70. Oxford University Press.
Neuman, Y., Weinstock, M. P. & Glasner, A. (2006) The effect of contextual factors on the judgment of informal reasoning fallacies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J. & Nisbett, R. E. (2002) Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979) Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Petty, R., Cacioppo, J. & Goldman, R. (1981) Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Rips, L. J. (1994) The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. MIT Press.
Rips, L. J. (2002) Circular reasoning. Cognitive Science
Sá, W. C., Kelley, C. N., Ho, C. & Stanovich, K. E. (2005) Thinking about personal theories: Individual differences in the coordination of theory and evidence. Personality and Individual Differences
Sell, A. (2006) Regulating welfare tradeoff ratios: Three tests of an evolutionary-computational model of human anger. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering
Sperber, D. (2009) L'effet gourou. L'autre côté
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. & Wilson, D. (2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Blackwell.
Thompson, V. A., Evans, J. St. B. T. & Handley, S. J. (2005b) Persuading and dissuading by conditional argument. Journal of Memory and Language
Wolfe, C. R. & Britt, M. A. (2008) Locus of the my-side bias in written argumentation. Thinking & Reasoning