Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Karg, Katja Schmelz, Martin Call, Josep and Tomasello, Michael 2015. Chimpanzees strategically manipulate what others can see. Animal Cognition, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 1069.

    Bourjade, Marie Meguerditchian, Adrien Maille, Audrey Gaunet, Florence and Vauclair, Jacques 2014. Olive baboons, Papio anubis, adjust their visual and auditory intentional gestures to the visual attention of others. Animal Behaviour, Vol. 87, p. 121.

    Bullinger, Anke F. Zimmermann, Felizitas Kaminski, Juliane and Tomasello, Michael 2011. Different social motives in the gestural communication of chimpanzees and human children. Developmental Science, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 58.

    Udell, Monique A. R. Dorey, Nicole R. and Wynne, Clive D. L. 2011. Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learning & Behavior, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 289.

    Zimmermann, Felizitas Zemke, Franziska Call, Josep and Gómez, Juan Carlos 2009. Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) point to inform a human about the location of a tool. Animal Cognition, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 347.

    Focquaert, Farah Braeckman, Johan and Platek, Steven M. 2008. An Evolutionary Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Human Self-awareness and Theory of Mind. Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 47.

    Hattori, Yuko Kuroshima, Hika and Fujita, Kazuo 2007. I know you are not looking at me: capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) sensitivity to human attentional states. Animal Cognition, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 141.

    Virányi, Zs. Topál, J. Miklósi, Á. and Csányi, V. 2006. A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children. Animal Cognition, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 13.

    Scerif, Gaia Gomez, Juan-Carlos and Byrne, Richard W. 2004. What do Diana monkeys know about the focus of attention of a conspecific?. Animal Behaviour, Vol. 68, Issue. 6, p. 1239.

    Topál, József Miklósi, Ádám and Mányik, Richárd 2004. A kutyaelme működésének vizsgálata: lehetőségek és korlátok. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, Vol. 59, Issue. 4, p. 521.

    De Veer, Monique W. and van den Bos, Ruud 1999. A critical review of methodology and interpretation of mirror self-recognition research in nonhuman primates. Animal Behaviour, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 459.


Assessing theory of mind with nonverbal procedures: Problems with training methods and an alternative “key” procedure

  • Juan Carlos Gómez (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 1998

This commentary criticizes nonverbal methods of assessing theory-of-mind on the basis of prior training of the critical response because they would encourage simple, nonmentalistic, associative solutions even in subjects with mentalistic capacities. I propose instead a new experimental paradigm based upon the use of spontaneous responses in less artificial situations. This method has already provided positive evidence of some level of ToM understanding in nonhuman primates.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *