Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes

  • Aron K. Barbey (a1) and Steven A. Sloman (a2)

Abstract

The phenomenon of base-rate neglect has elicited much debate. One arena of debate concerns how people make judgments under conditions of uncertainty. Another more controversial arena concerns human rationality. In this target article, we attempt to unpack the perspectives in the literature on both kinds of issues and evaluate their ability to explain existing data and their conceptual coherence. From this evaluation we conclude that the best account of the data should be framed in terms of a dual-process model of judgment, which attributes base-rate neglect to associative judgment strategies that fail to adequately represent the set structure of the problem. Base-rate neglect is reduced when problems are presented in a format that affords accurate representation in terms of nested sets of individuals.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ayton, P. & Wright, G. (1994) Subjective probability: What should we believe? In: Subjective probability, ed Wright, G. & Ayton, P., pp. 163–83. Wiley.
Bauer, M. I. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993) How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science 4:372–78.
Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J. & Shevell, S. K. (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157–61.
Brase, G. L. (2002a) Ecological and evolutionary validity: Comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, & Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review 109:722–28.
Brase, G. L. (2002b) Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15:381401.
Brase, G. L., Fiddick, L. & Harries, C. (2006) Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59:965–76.
Calvillo, D. P. & Revlin, R. (2005) The role of similarity in deductive categorical inference. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12:938–44.
Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A. & Graboys, T. B. (1978) Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. The New England Journal of Medicine 299:9991000.
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1996) Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 58:173.
Eddy, D. M. (1982) Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A., pp. 249–67. Cambridge University Press.
Estes, W. K., Campbell, J. A., Hatsopoulos, N. & Hurwitz, J. B. (1989) Base-rate effects in category learning: A comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:556–71.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Over, D. E. & Perham, N. (2002) Background beliefs in Bayesian inference. Memory & Cognition 30:179–90.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Perham, N., Over, D. E. & Thompson, V. A. (2000) Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems. Cognition 77:197213.
Evans, J. St. B. T. & Over, D. E. (1996) Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983) Modularity of mind. MIT Press.
Fox, C. & Levav, J. (2004) Partition-edit-count: Naïve extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133:626–42.
Gigerenzer, G. (1993) The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In: G. A Handbook of Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences, ed Keren, G. & Lewis, G., pp. 331–39. Erlbaum.
Gigerenzer, G. (1996) The psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. Medical Decision Making 16:273–80.
Gigerenzer, G. (2006) Ecological rationality: Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition summary of research area II. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition Web site: http://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/en/forschung/abc/forschungsfelder/feld2.htm
Gigerenzer, G., Hell, W. & Blank, H. (1988) Presentation and content: The use of base-rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14:513–25.
Gigerenzer, G. & Hoffrage, U. (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102:684704.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U. & Ebert, A. (1998) AIDS counseling for low-risk clients. AIDS Care 10:197211.
Gigerenzer, G. & Regier, T. P. (1996) How do we tell an association from a rule? Psychological Bulletin 119:2326.
Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R., eds. (2001) Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. & the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D., eds. (2002) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (2001) Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition 78:247–76.
Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (2002) Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: Rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss, and Martignon. Cognition 84:353–59.
Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (in press) Children's understanding of posterior probability. Cognition. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.005.
Gluck, M. A. & Bower, G. H. (1988) From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117:227–47.
Griffin, D. & Buehler, R. (1999) Frequency, probability, and prediction: Easy solutions to cognitive illusions? Cognitive Psychology 38:4878.
Griggs, R. A. & Newstead, S. (1982) The role of problem structure in a deductive reasoning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8:297307.
Grossen, B. & Carnine, D. (1990) Diagramming a logic strategy: Effects on difficult problem types and transfer. Learning Disability Quarterly 13:168–82.
Hammerton, M. (1973) A case of radical probability estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101:252–54.
Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S. & Martignon, L. (2002) Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition 84:343–52.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M. S. & Caverni, J.-P. (1999) Naïve probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review 106:6288.
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, ed. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D., pp. 4981. Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2005) A model of heuristic judgment. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, ed. Holyoak, K. J. & Morris, R. G., pp. 267–93. Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80:237–51.
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (1996) On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review 103:582–91.
Keren, K. & Thijs, L. J. (1996) The base-rate controversy: Is the glass half-full or half empty? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:26.
Kleiter, G. D. (1994) Natural sampling: Rationality without base-rates. In: Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology, ed. Fischer, G. H. & Laming, D., pp. 375–88. Springer-Verlag.
Kleiter, G. D., Krebs, M., Doherty, M. E., Gavaran, H., Chadwick, R. & Brake, G. B. (1997) Do subjects understand base-rates? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72:2561.
Koehler, J. J. (1996) The base-rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:153.
Kurzenhauser, S. & Hoffrage, U. (2002) Teaching Bayesian reasoning: An evaluation of a classroom tutorial for medical students. Medical Teacher 24:516–21.
Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R. & Gigerenzer, G. (2003) Communicating statistical DNA evidence. Jurimetrics 43:147–63.
Linton, M. (1975) Memory for real-world events. In: Explorations in cognition, ed. Norman, D. A. & Rumelhart, D. E., pp. 376404. Freedman Press.
Linton, M. (1982) Transformations of memory in everyday life. In: Memory observed, ed. Neisser, U., pp. 7791. Freedman Press.
Macchi, L. (2000) Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82:217–36.
Mellers, B. & McGraw, A. P. (1999) How to improve Bayesian reasoning: Comments on Gigerenzer & Hoffrage (1995) Psychological Review 106:417–24.
Monaghan, P. & Stenning, K. (1998) Effects of representational modality and thinking style on learning to solve reasoning problems. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Derry, S. J., pp. 716–21. Erlbaum.
Newstead, S. E. (1989) Interpretational errors in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language 28:7891.
Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K. & McKinley, S. C. (1992) Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18:211–33.
Over, D. E. (2000a) Ecological rationality and its heuristics. Thinking and Reasoning 6:182–92.
Over, D. E. (2000b) Ecological issues: A reply to Todd, Fiddick, & Krauss. Thinking and Reasoning 6:385–88.
Over, D. E. (2003) From massive modularity to meta-representation: The evolution of higher cognition. In: Evolution and the psychology of thinking: The debate, ed. Over, D. E., pp. 121–44. Psychology Press.
Over, D. E. (2007) Content-independent conditional inference. In: Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition, ed. Roberts, M. J., pp. 83103. Psychology Press.
Over, D. E. & Green, D. W. (2001) Contingency, causation, and adaptive inference. Psychological Review 108:682–84.
Pillemer, E. D., Rhinehart, E. D. & White, S. H. (1986) Memories of life transitions: The first year in college. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research and Applications 5:109–23.
Ramsey, F. P. (1964) Truth and probability. In: Studies in subjective probability, ed. Kyburg, H. E. Jr., & Smokler, E., pp. 6192. Wiley.
Reyna, V. F. (1991) Class inclusion, the conjunction fallacy, and other cognitive illusions. Developmental Review 11:317–36.
Reyna, V. F. & Brainerd, C. J. (1992) A fuzzy-trace theory of reasoning and remembering: Paradoxes, patterns, and parallelism. In: From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes, ed Healy, A., Kosslyn, S. & Shiffrin, R., pp. 235–59. Erlbaum.
Reyna, V. F. & Brainerd, C. J. (1994) The origins of probability judgment: A review of data and theories. In: Subjective probability, ed Wright, G. & Ayton, P., pp. 239–72. Wiley.
Reyna, V. F. & Brainerd, C. J. (1995) Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences 7:175.
Savage, L. J. (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley.
Schwartz, N. & Sudman, S. (1994) Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports. Springer Verlag.
Schwartz, N. & Wanke, M. (2002) Experimental and contextual heuristics in frequency judgment: Ease of recall and response scales. In: Etc. Frequency processing and cognition, ed Sedlmeier, P. & Betsch, T., pp. 89108. Oxford University Press.
Sedlmeier, P. & Betsch, T. (2002) Etc. Frequency processing and cognition. Oxford University Press.
Sedlmeier, P. & Gigerenzer, G. (2001) Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130:380400.
Sloman, S. A. (1996a) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119:322.
Sloman, S. A. (1998) Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology 35:133.
Sloman, S. A. (2005) Causal models: How we think about the world and its alternatives. Oxford University Press.
Sloman, S. A., Lombrozo, T. & Malt, B. C. (in press) Mild ontology and domain-specific categorization. In: Integrating the mind, Roberts, M. J.. Psychology Press.
Sloman, S. A. & Over, D. E. (2003) Probability judgment from the inside and out. In: Evolution and the psychology of thinking: The debate, ed Over, D. E., pp. 145–70. Psychology Press.
Sloman, S. A., Over, D. E., Slovak, L. & Stibel, J. M. (2003) Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91:296309.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (1998a) Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127:161–88.
Stanovich, K. E. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:645726.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90:293315.
Wagenaar, W. A. (1986) My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cognitive Psychology 18:225–52.
Yamagishi, K. (2003) Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: Frequency or nested sets? Experimental Psychology 50:97106.
Zacks, R. T. & Hasher, L. (2002) Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. In: Etc. Frequency processing and cognition, ed Sedlmeier, P. & Betsch, T., pp. 2136. Oxford University Press.

Keywords

Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes

  • Aron K. Barbey (a1) and Steven A. Sloman (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed