Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Sharf, Robert H. 2015. Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun. Journal of Indian Philosophy,


    Block, Ned 2007. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 30, Issue. 5-6,


    Block, Ned 2005. Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 46.


    Cleeremans, Axel 2005. The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology.


    Block, Ned 2003. Tactile sensation via spatial perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 7, Issue. 7, p. 285.


    Dretske, Fred 2003. Experience as Representation. Philosophical Issues, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 67.


    Block, N 2001. Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition, Vol. 79, Issue. 1-2, p. 197.


    ×

Biology versus computation in the study of consciousness

  • Ned Block (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97330052
  • Published online: 01 March 1997
Abstract

The distinction between phenomenal (P) and access (A) consciousness arises from the battle between biological and computational approaches to the mind. If P = A, the computationalists are right; but if not, the biological nature of P yields its scientific nature.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×