Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
GROSSBERG, STEPHEN
1984.
Some Psychophysiological and Pharmacological Correlates of a Developmental, Cognitive and Motivational Theorya.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 425,
Issue. 1,
p.
58.
Larsen, Steen F.
1996.
Correspondence to the past: The essence of the archaeology metaphor.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
200.
Nelson, Thomas O.
1996.
Metacognition, metaphors, and the measurement of human memory.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
204.
Bahrick, Harry P.
1996.
The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
White, K. Geoffrey
1996.
Direct remembering and the correspondence metaphor.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
208.
Bjork, Robert A.
and
Wickens, Thomas D.
1996.
Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
193.
Algom, Daniel
1996.
Correspondence conception of memory: A good match is hard to find.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
188.
Kruglanski, Arie W.
1996.
The storehouse/correspondence partition in memory research: Promises and perils.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
198.
Eichenbaum, Howard
1996.
The real-life/laboratory controversy as viewed from the cognitive neurobiology of animal learning and memory.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
196.
Koriat, Asher
and
Goldsmith, Morris
1996.
The correspondence metaphor of memory: Right, wrong, or useful?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
211.
Alterman, Richard
1996.
Everyday memory and activity.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
189.
Winograd, Eugene
1996.
Contexts and functions of retrieval.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
209.
Wright, Daniel B.
1996.
Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
210.
Mayes, Andrew R.
van Eijk, Rob
and
Gooding, Patricia L.
1996.
Accuracy and quantity are poor measures of recall and recognition.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
McNamara, Timothy P.
1996.
False dichotomies and dead metaphors.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
203.
Palmer, David C.
1996.
Operationaling “correspondence”.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
206.
Kvavilashvili, Lia
and
Ellis, Judi
1996.
Let's forget the everyday/laboratory controversy.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
199.
Newby, Ian R.
and
Ross, Michael
1996.
Beyond the correspondence metaphor: When accuracy cannot be assessed.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
205.
Small, Jocelyn Penny
1996.
Classical antecedents for modern metaphors for memory.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
208.
Koriat, Asher
and
Goldsmith, Morris
1996.
Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
167.