Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Competence, reflective equilibrium, and dual-system theories

  • Wesley Buckwalter (a1) and Stephen Stich (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

A critique of inferences from “is” to “ought” plays a central role in Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) defense of descriptivism. However, the reflective equilibrium strategy described by Goodman and embraced by Rawls, Cohen, and many others poses an important challenge to that critique. Dual-system theories may help respond to that challenge.

Copyright
References
Hide All
CohenL. J. (1981) Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:317–70.
GoodmanN. (1965) Fact, fiction, and forecast. Bobbs-Merrill.
RawlsJ. (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
StanovichK. E. (1999) Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Elrbaum.
StichS. (1981) Inferential competence: Right you are if you think you are. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4(3):353–54.
StichS. (1990) The fragmentation of reason: Preface to a pragmatic theory of cognitive evaluation. MIT Press.
StichS. (2001) Plato's method meets cognitive science. Free Inquiry 21(2):3638.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 102 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.